Scott Linehan is looking to complete a trifecta at RB

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,316
Reaction score
37,216
He's already hurt though...

Sorry, but I'm not relying on a 29 year old injury prone back that didn't look good in rotation last year at all. Get a runner behind Zeke (Morris) and a solid receiver (Dunbar), I don't want to be carrying 4 RBs going into the regular season.

He won't be hurt when the season starts and I ain't interested in getting rid of our second best RB.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,036
Reaction score
37,194
Zeke
DMac
Morris
Dunbar

Jackson PS
No FB (Sorry Jaylon Smith)

Ready to go

After Dallas did not pick up a fullback in the offseason or draft, I had thought that the team finally would not carry one.

However, I don't see that being the plan at all. If the Cowboys did not want to carry one, they would not be converting Rod Smith and Keith Smith to the spot. Garrett likes having a fullback for certain situations, but it is a limited-use position for this team, which is the reason that an attempt is being made to convert special-teams players into a part-time lead blocker.

IMO, the Cowboys need to commit one way or the other. Either get serious about the fullback position and address it with a player on par with the tight ends or eliminate it entirely. That they have shown they are not interested in eliminating it entirely likely means that we'll carry one again this year although that fullback might not currently be on the roster.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,036
Reaction score
37,194
He won't be hurt when the season starts and I ain't interested in getting rid of our second best RB.

I'm not sure based on his history that we can say he won't be hurt when the season starts. I'm very happy with what McFadden did last year and very surprised that he was able to stay healthy. We've got months for this position to shake out one way or the other.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,515
Reaction score
12,532
I wonder if the Cowboys have considered attacking the goal line and short yardage runs by putting Leary in at LG and lining Collins up as a FB.
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,109
Reaction score
6,542
At this point, I'd want something like this

- Zeke
- Morris
- Dunbar

I simply don't see McFadden staying healthy again and I value Dunbar as a receiver too much to worry about his injury history too much. Not a crap ton of Woodhead's and Sproles in the league.

I like McFadden as a closer like Barber was early on. When Dallas has a good lead, bring in McFadden. He showed he likes to run hard at people and in the 4th quarter after a big dose of Zeke all game, teams are going to hate having McFadden running straight at them.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,279
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
At this point, I'd want something like this

- Zeke
- Morris
- Dunbar

I simply don't see McFadden staying healthy again and I value Dunbar as a receiver too much to worry about his injury history too much. Not a crap ton of Woodhead's and Sproles in the league.

What makes you think Dunbar will stay healthy? I would bet he gets injured before McFadden.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
I like McFadden as a closer like Barber was early on. When Dallas has a good lead, bring in McFadden. He showed he likes to run hard at people and in the 4th quarter after a big dose of Zeke all game, teams are going to hate having McFadden running straight at them.

Morris is your closer. He or Zeke. McFadden is not a closer. You need to get him out in space. You don't want him pounding the hole repeatedly.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,279
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
After Dallas did not pick up a fullback in the offseason or draft, I had thought that the team finally would not carry one.

However, I don't see that being the plan at all. If the Cowboys did not want to carry one, they would not be converting Rod Smith and Keith Smith to the spot. Garrett likes having a fullback for certain situations, but it is a limited-use position for this team, which is the reason that an attempt is being made to convert special-teams players into a part-time lead blocker.

IMO, the Cowboys need to commit one way or the other. Either get serious about the fullback position and address it with a player on par with the tight ends or eliminate it entirely. That they have shown they are not interested in eliminating it entirely likely means that we'll carry one again this year although that fullback might not currently be on the roster.

Yes Garrett likes having a FB on the roster.
By converting Rod Smith, something I brought up last year toward the end of the season. And if he beats out Keith Smith, they essentially can have their 4 RB's on the roster.
Zeke to start, DMC & Morris as backup and situational plays. as well, Rod Smith can be used at RB at times. He has lined up as a WR and he plays ST's.

So with both Rod and Zeke in the back field, who gets the ball in some situations. Yes Zeke mostly, but show a few times rod can do damage to a d, then it gets more involved for a D to defend.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,838
Reaction score
20,694
What makes you think Dunbar will stay healthy? I would bet he gets injured before McFadden.

Dunbar is injury prone, McFadden is an injury prone player. McFadden is 29 years old, he's not a bruiser, he a slight speed back that needs large holes and lanes to exploit. We have that in Zeke. Dunbar is a receiving back, and again, these are harder to find in this league. What would you rather have, a player that is capable of being a Darren Sproles/Woodhead type back or McFadden in a limited role once again....which he has never proved he is productive in doing. He wasn't great behind Murray and he wasn't great when he was backing up Randle. We have to change the blocking scheme for McFadden before he became consistent behind the line.

Give me Zeke, Morris, and Dunbar.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,279
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Dunbar is injury prone, McFadden is an injury prone player. McFadden is 29 years old, he's not a bruiser, he a slight speed back that needs large holes and lanes to exploit. We have that in Zeke. Dunbar is a receiving back, and again, these are harder to find in this league. What would you rather have, a player that is capable of being a Darren Sproles/Woodhead type back or McFadden in a limited role once again....which he has never proved he is productive in doing. He wasn't great behind Murray and he wasn't great when he was backing up Randle. We have to change the blocking scheme for McFadden before he became consistent behind the line.

Give me Zeke, Morris, and Dunbar.

McFadden didn't play behind Murray, blows your entire post up there........McFadden should have started over Randle, and you know it, just won't admit it.
And tell that to a few players that DMC is not physical...did you even watch some of his runs last year punishing some players as well as getting some tough yards.

He has had 2 healthy seasons in a row now. Dunbar has not. His only healthy seasons were when he sat mostly on the bench. When his role was increased, he got injured.
Urban legend they changed the blocking scheme for DMC. This was written by a reporter and everyone ran with it. The team did not come out and say this. Matter of fact the OL said they liked blocking for DMC no matter what scheme they used, as they did both. Obviously that reporter doesn't know the schemes, like most fans don't either, but think they know better than the team does.
I would bet most can't look at plays from any team on any play and tell if they are zone or man blocking.

I believe DMC can take over Dunbar's role very easily. He is not limited as you think he is.
 

Zekeats

theranchsucks
Messages
13,157
Reaction score
15,711
And then McFadden went on to be a starter for us last year. What is your point?

You're not providing anything to me. What makes Jackson better, McFadden and Morris could be "scrubs", that doesn't make Jackson anything more than a PS player at this point. Support your claim.

Says a lot. He couldn't even beat out uncle jail bird Joey for the starting spot.
 

mattjames2010

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,838
Reaction score
20,694
McFadden didn't play behind Murray, blows your entire post up there........McFadden should have started over Randle, and you know it, just won't admit it.
And tell that to a few players that DMC is not physical...did you even watch some of his runs last year punishing some players as well as getting some tough yards.

He has had 2 healthy seasons in a row now. Dunbar has not. His only healthy seasons were when he sat mostly on the bench. When his role was increased, he got injured.
Urban legend they changed the blocking scheme for DMC. This was written by a reporter and everyone ran with it. The team did not come out and say this. Matter of fact the OL said they liked blocking for DMC no matter what scheme they used, as they did both. Obviously that reporter doesn't know the schemes, like most fans don't either, but think they know better than the team does.
I would bet most can't look at plays from any team on any play and tell if they are zone or man blocking.

I believe DMC can take over Dunbar's role very easily. He is not limited as you think he is.

I'm not talking about DeMarco Murray, I'm talking about this guy

i


No, has one healthy season being a backup and a healthy season where he was a backup to start the year and only started 10 games. But that's not really the issue I am discussing, I'm asking you to show me when he has proven he is a good change of pace back, because I'm not seeing it.

As for the change in blocking: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015...-demarco-murray-joseph-randle-darren-mcfadden

Lastly, please show me a year where McFadden looked like the receiver Dunbar was becoming last year? The closest was 2010, easily his best season in this league, which was 6 years ago.
 

Cowboy06

Professional Positive Naysayer
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
585
If Dunbar isn't ready for camp or the season opener, he has more issues than just an ACL. That has what, a 9 month healing time these days?

Good point. Remember when an ACL was at least a year to recover and another year to get back up to speed?
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,036
Reaction score
37,194
Yes Garrett likes having a FB on the roster.
By converting Rod Smith, something I brought up last year toward the end of the season. And if he beats out Keith Smith, they essentially can have their 4 RB's on the roster.
Zeke to start, DMC & Morris as backup and situational plays. as well, Rod Smith can be used at RB at times. He has lined up as a WR and he plays ST's.

So with both Rod and Zeke in the back field, who gets the ball in some situations. Yes Zeke mostly, but show a few times rod can do damage to a d, then it gets more involved for a D to defend.

I do like that Rod Smith can bring some versatility to the role ... if he has the ability to function as a lead blocker. The problem with the position since Moose is that the fullback has usually been the least-talented starter on our offense, even less-so than other subpackage players.

The problem we run into with keeping one this year is the number of running backs and tight ends in consideration for a roster spot.

Drafting two RBs, gives us five (Elliott, McFadden, Morris, Jackson and Dunbar) contending for three spots. They might could contend for four, but not if we keep four tight ends out of Witten, Hanna, Escobar, Swaim and Gathers. It seems likely to me that from that bunch, we do keep four TEs, so which two of the RBs do you cut?

I think Morris and McFadden are basically fighting for the same spot (veteran backup running back) but if Dallas likes both, Dunbar could be the odd man out and Jackson could go to the PS. However, if Jackson flashes starting-level talent, I would think we wouldn't want to try to get him to the PS, so either Morris or McFadden goes. I don't want to count out Dunbar, either; he was very good in a specialty role before getting hurt.

It's a good problem to have but someone will get cut who has shown ability to contribute to this team. I just hope we make the right choices.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,279
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I'm not talking about DeMarco Murray, I'm talking about this guy

i


No, has one healthy season being a backup and a healthy season where he was a backup to start the year and only started 10 games. But that's not really the issue I am discussing, I'm asking you to show me when he has proven he is a good change of pace back, because I'm not seeing it.

As for the change in blocking: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015...-demarco-murray-joseph-randle-darren-mcfadden

Lastly, please show me a year where McFadden looked like the receiver Dunbar was becoming last year? The closest was 2010, easily his best season in this league, which was 6 years ago.

:lmao2:as I said, that was from a reporter, as this was the one I referred to...not from the team....The OL themselves had said something different.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Zeke
DMac
Morris
Dunbar

Jackson PS
No FB (Sorry Jaylon Smith)

Ready to go

You put Jackson on the PS and you probably lose him.

IMO, the Cowboys are going to trade RBs. They almost have no choice or lose one for nothing.
 
Top