Bleu Star
Bye Felicia!
- Messages
- 33,925
- Reaction score
- 19,920
You tell 'em Bleu!
Elliott is going to be a monster.
Yessirrrr!
You tell 'em Bleu!
Elliott is going to be a monster.
Like I said... "When Dallas has a good lead, bring in McFadden" I'd hate to see the Cowboys up by three scores and Zeke still in the game running and then he gets hurt.When you have Zeke and Morris, you only use McFadden if there is an injury. McFradden's quality is in his versatility, not his running per say. Morris is a much better pure runner and will be perfect to come in for tough yards in the 2nd half or to spell Zeke.
Just think of Zeke as Emmitt Smith. Why would you ever take him out unless you have a big lead and you can afford to?
1) Well yes if a player stays healthy for 2 straight years. I'm not going to turn around and call them an injury risk. Just like how Tony wasn't an injury risk until he became one recently. You'd look like a fool if you said Romo isn't an injury risk when you look at his entire career. That isn't working something into an agenda that's common sense.
2) Not football related.
3) And he's going to get a ton of carries now?
4) Again, how big a workload do you think he's going to have?
McFadden is NOTHING special. Nothing at all. Any fool can gain 1000 yards behind this line with 250 carries.
Since DMC had 1089 yards on only 239 carries last year (4.6 avg) he must be a little special...right?
Any decent back could do that behind our line. Dont you agree? What is so special about McFadden for you? Im not seeing it.
Obviously the Cowboys agree do they not? Drafting Zeke and the other rookie and signing Morris?
I like Morris much more than I like McFadden.
Going beyond the stats and before them as you should, you watch him play. You aren't even taking into account the problem of having a very poor passing attack. He's not a special back but he was better than average last year.
Any decent back could do that behind our line. Dont you agree? What is so special about McFadden for you? Im not seeing it.
Obviously the Cowboys agree do they not? Drafting Zeke and the other rookie and signing Morris?
Depends on what you are looking at. I dont consider 3 TD's in over 200 carries as average. Behind the best Oline in football I think 80% of the backs in the NFL could be better than average.
McFadden definitely did better than I thought he would. But none the less, I was not impressed in the least with his running.
Considering the garbage we had a QB most of the year for DMC to pull off a 4.6 season was pretty remarkable.
The Cowboys signed Morris to a reasonable deal and will use him in short yardage. He fills a role that needed filled and saved a draft pick.
The ability to draft a generational player like Zeke isn't making any kind of statement about DMC. Jackson was drafted because of the injury to Dunbar.
Then you fail to truly understand the situation. How many TDs did the entire team score last year with its misely 17 PPG? Take out the first 2.5 games and then look at it. You still haven't addressed how the lack of a passing game affected the running game and the overall offense nor actually watching the guy run.
Then you fail to truly understand the situation.
Watching the guy run is even worse. He stinks. Any fool could get 1000 yards behind this line given over 200 carries regardless of how good or bad the pass game is. And one of the big reasons they could score that many points is because of clowns like McFadden not being able to break a long TD or punch it in. Do you think Zeke is only going to have 3 TD's if Romo goes down? Not a chance.
The Cowboys had to change their entire blocking scheme in order to accommodate the hapless McFadden. And oh by the way, McFadden averaged barely 4 yards per carry the previous 8 years of his career. Get over it, he stinks.
In 9 years McFadden has a total of 28 rushing TD's. That is horrible. The guy is NOT a play maker. He is middling at best.
I dont see anything remarkable about 4.6 yards per carry
1) Well yes if a player stays healthy for 2 straight years. I'm not going to turn around and call them an injury risk. Just like how Tony wasn't an injury risk until he became one recently. You'd look like a fool if you said Romo isn't an injury risk when you look at his entire career. That isn't working something into an agenda that's common sense.
2) Not football related.
3) And he's going to get a ton of carries now?
4) Again, how big a workload do you think he's going to have?
There will be times when EE will be the best matchup out there or provide the best versatility for the next play call. Other times you may matchup with the defense better with a scatback. You take what the defense gives you.
The data on RB and number of carries concerns me and I want to protect my investment to maximize it long term. EE is so dynamic that he is likely the best option down in and down out. He can be a scatback, flex out, run between the tackles, and in the red zone.
Bellcow is not sustainable.