Seahawks release Shaun Alexander

Hostile;2044697 said:
I was wondering, do you think the Bucs will release Simms? I know they gave up on Plummer so they are down to 5 QBs I think.

Garcia
Simms
Griese
McKown
Gradkowski

Not saying we should get him (I would if it was McKown. I was pissed when they signed him.), just wondering.

Well, if released, I think we should make a play for him. He's pretty young, has experience and I would much prefer him than BJ if Romo were to go down.

I heard (I forget who) on the NFLN the other night that if he's released, Miami may have interest in signing him. That's probably the best situation for him 'cause he'd get to play right away.
 
If Shaun would agree to a one year, cap friendly deal, I'd be really intrigued. I think he may still be somewhat effective in the redzone and would be insurance in case the back we draft turns out to be a bust.
 
tomson75;2044567 said:
...before anyone asks.....the answer is NO!

1350-30PCFLOORPUZZLE-KITTEN.JPG


I kant haz washed up, big name vets?
 
Hostile;2044697 said:
I was wondering, do you think the Bucs will release Simms? I know they gave up on Plummer so they are down to 5 QBs I think.

Garcia
Simms
Griese
McKown
Gradkowski

Not saying we should get him (I would if it was McKown. I was pissed when they signed him.), just wondering.

Who is this McKown you speak of?



:D
 
Hailmary;2044744 said:
If Shaun would agree to a one year, cap friendly deal, I'd be really intrigued. I think he may still be somewhat effective in the redzone and would be insurance in case the back we draft turns out to be a bust.


Barber is pretty effective in the endzone.

Alexander would be this years Eddie George - no thanks.
 
If it was cheap, I'd be for it.

We'd get an experienced backup RB (which, for a playoff team, is probably a good thing). But I'd still want to draft a RB somewhere....

Barber, Alexander, and a rookie would give us a nice rotation of running backs. So long as Alexander understood he was coming into Dallas in a reduced role.
 
I'd be for Shaun coming here, he's a good back, not what he once was, but the Seahawk line fell apart last year

they're looking for a complete overhaul there
 
Vintage;2044773 said:
If it was cheap, I'd be for it.

We'd get an experienced backup RB (which, for a playoff team, is probably a good thing). But I'd still want to draft a RB somewhere....

Barber, Alexander, and a rookie would give us a nice rotation of running backs. So long as Alexander understood he was coming into Dallas in a reduced role.

Bob Sacamano;2044782 said:
I'd be for Shaun coming here, he's a good back, not what he once was, but the Seahawk line fell apart last year

they're looking for a complete overhaul there
I would MUCH rather draft a RB who can also be a KR guy than Shawn who will not contribute to Special Teams at all .
 
thewireman;2044557 said:
I have just read on another forum that the Seahawks have released Shaun Alexander. Anybody else hear anything?

no...and cont care....we dont need him

dude is washed up...think horse that is headed to the glue factory

David
 
Hostile;2044795 said:
I would MUCH rather draft a RB who can also be a KR guy than Shawn who will not contribute to Special Teams at all .

I'd just rather draft a RB that can actually run and make plays, and honestly there are probably at LEAST 8-10-12 guys I'd rather draft than sign Alexander even for the league minimum

Alexander is done...toast...

David
 
Hostile;2044795 said:
I would MUCH rather draft a RB who can also be a KR guy than Shawn who will not contribute to Special Teams at all .

I must have missed where signing Alexander would prevent us from doing so.


In fact, I stated I would also want us to draft a RB.

Right now, we have one on the roster (well, close enough). Alexander would be 2. Drafted guy numero 3.
 
YoMick;2044767 said:
Barber is pretty effective in the endzone.

I agree w/ this, but it would just be a different look.

Alexander would be this years Eddie George - no thanks.
Not necessarily. When we brought George in, he was expected to carry the load w/ Julius being a rookie and Lee being a one year pro. When George didn't produce, it was a disappointment because he was supposed to have a greater impact. I think Shaun's role would be more as a compliment and whatever production he provides would be a bonus.

We also need depth. As of now, our rbs are Barber and Thompson (and an unproven rookie to be drafted).
 
Vintage;2044815 said:
I must have missed where signing Alexander would prevent us from doing so.


In fact, I stated I would also want us to draft a RB.

Right now, we have one on the roster (well, close enough). Alexander would be 2. Drafted guy numero 3.
Having Alexander makes drafting a RB less important. If we sign him, and I'm not denying it is tempting, it virtually means that we either have to get a Skyler Green late or we'd be using an early pick on a guy who is 3rd string.

I don't care for that idea.
 
Vintage;2044815 said:
I must have missed where signing Alexander would prevent us from doing so.


In fact, I stated I would also want us to draft a RB.

Right now, we have one on the roster (well, close enough). Alexander would be 2. Drafted guy numero 3.

honestly, nothing is probably better than Alexander

he just doesnt seem to have anything left...I'd rather have two rookies behind MBIII than waste a roster spot on him...

David
 
Hostile;2044821 said:
Having Alexander makes drafting a RB less important. If we sign him, and I'm not denying it is tempting, it virtually means that we either have to get a Skyler Green late or we'd be using an early pick on a guy who is 3rd string.

I don't care for that idea.

or pacman signs and he and crayton split the duties.
 
Hostile;2044795 said:
I would MUCH rather draft a RB who can also be a KR guy than Shawn who will not contribute to Special Teams at all .

I'm comfortable w/ Stanback and Austin returning kicks for us.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,647
Messages
13,824,278
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top