DogFace
Carharris2
- Messages
- 13,141
- Reaction score
- 15,615
Just a bit of sarcasm. The point was that knowing and doing are separate things. Knowing takes study, doing takes practice and experience.
And still you avoid the question of what kind of impact (or even opportunity) Lee would have had being fully healthy for only one game after his game 3 injury. One game out of the next 14. Just one, and somehow you think that was an opportunity missed by the team for Lee to make a big impact.
Obviously with all things being equal, Lee is better than Wilson. But that wasn’t the case, no matter how much you want to bury your head in the sand to the truth. Lee was injured and unavailable for all or parts of 13 games last season, and Wilson had played had played SLB the last couple of years and Lee hadn’t. All things were not equal.
Sorry. I thought I answered. He would’ve had more of an impact playing instead of Wilson if for no other reason than he would’ve have negatively affected LVE’s impact. However, one other reason is he’s better with or without experience at a nearly identical position.
Doesn’t matter if it’s equal. Lee was, would’ve been, and is better than Wilson. If healthy. Which they claimed he was.
I’d like to ask Lee if he thought it would be better for the team if he sat out because he didn’t have experience or if he had played SLB.