Senior Bowl Chatter....

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
87,300
Reaction score
205,601
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
http://optimumscouting.com/draft/20...se-led-by-noah-spence-and-reggie-ragland.html


The South Roster offers the Senior Bowl’s most talented defensive player in Noah Spence, two potential Alabama defenders, versatility in their secondary players and a Maryland defender who reminds an awful lot of last year’s late rising second-rounder Eric Rowe.


Defensive Linemen

Noah Spence, DE/OLB, Eastern Kentucky

Noah Spence’s talent on the field puts him squarely in the top-20, if not top-10, discussion. But first, teams need to feel comfortable with his past, most notably a drug addiction while at Ohio State. Fox Sports’ Bruce Feldman detailed Spence’s recovery from drug addiction, and signs point to the elite talent working his way into pro teams’ good graces. As a prospect, Spence possesses elite initial quickness, burst off the snap on the perimeter and countering inside and finishing ability in space to persistently capitalize on tackle-for-loss opportunities. His athleticism and explosiveness as a pass-rusher puts him in the discussion for the best “edge” prospect in the 2016 class, potentially making an immediate impact for 3-4 defenses at the NFL level.

Jarran Reed, DT, Alabama

Reed is the best run defender of the NFL-bound Alabama defensive line bunch. Playing primarily the nose guard (in 3-4 set) or 3-technique spot (in 4-3 sets), Reed gets his hands up quickly to establish position and hold ground well on the interior. His extension off the snap and extremely sturdy lower half allows him to thrive against the run, and he’s the key to Alabama’s interior run defense that allowed top players like Jonathan Allen and Reggie Ragland to thrive. He was a bit under-appreciated this year, but really showed up in the National Championship game against Clemson. He was a crucial cog in the Alabama defense, and could prove to be the most impactful interior defensive lineman in Mobile.

Sheldon Rankins, DT/DE, Louisville

Rankins is an average height defensive tackle with a large round body that is a run stopper. The All-ACC defensive lineman does a good job of firing off the ball low and hard and using his hands to lock out blockers and control the P.O.A. He has good lateral quickness that allows him to stunt easily to make big plays in the opposing backfield. His major flaw is his pass rushing ability that is caused by his lack of a first step and poor hand usage. Sheldon has the ability to play as an interior lineman or an end.

Shawn Oakman, DE, Baylor

With one of the most physically imposing body types college football has ever seen, Shawn Oakman looks the part and then some of a future NFL superstar. But the 6’8″, 290-pound defensive end has been a three-year key contributor and a two-year starter and still doesn’t offer consistent play to merit a first- or maybe even second-round draft grade. Oakman is a project, a talent worth tapping into, but NFL teams will question if he’ll ever reach the peak that his body type alludes to. Similar to Oklahoma State’s Justin Gilbert from two drafts ago (though character has derailed Gilbert’s career so far), some players just will not improve, regardless of their athletic capabilities. But he’ll look to prove that theory wrong in Mobile.

  1. Matt Ioannidis, DT, Temple
  2. Charles Tapper, DE, Oklahoma
  3. Dadi Nicolas, DE, Virginia The
  4. Bronson Kaufusi, DE, BYU
  5. Quinton Jefferson, DT/DE, Maryland

Linebackers


Reggie Ragland, Alabama

Ragland is destined to be compared to prior Alabama linebacker turned first-round pick CJ Mosely, but Ragland is a slightly different type of inside defender. While not an elite athlete, Ragland’s adeptness in mid-field pass coverage was part of how the Alabama pass-rush was able to thrive so much. A polished, patient and calculating inside presence, Ragland doesn’t take his defensive line’s play for granted, rarely taking false steps and reacting at a high level on the perimeter. Ragland’s range, effectiveness in space and coverage upside should have him land in the first-round. NFL teams will covet his readiness, but his athletic testing at the NFL combine could be difference, assuming he plays as well as expected in Mobile.

Kentrell Brothers, Missouri

Brothers was a bit forgotten on a Missouri defense that, as a whole, was under-appreciated thanks to a putrid offense. Still, Brothers might be one of the best linebackers in the 2016 class. He’s extremely explosive in his change of direction, utilizing active feet to both react in coverage and turn and run upfield with burst. His activeness tends to cause him to be at times a bit over-aggressive in running lanes as well as not setting up well enough to take on blockers as he scrapes, but he’s among the most explosive and strong armed linebackers in Mobile, and should thrive in all drills during the week of practice.

Jordan Jenkins, Georgia

Playing a defensive end role for the Bulldogs this year, Jenkins will look to return to his more natural linebacker spot during practices. As an edge, Jenkins struggled to show build-up speed to win as an edge rusher, though he proved effective at pinching down the line, separating in traffic and finishing as a run defender. He’s not overly quick off the snap, but his inside pass-rush capabilities is a plus for his 3-4 strongside linebacker upside. How he fares in coverage and in space in run defense will be intriguing to watch during practices.

Deion Jones, LSU

A Butkus finalist for the nation’s top linebacker award, Jones had a breakout year racking up 80 tackles and 10.5 tackles for loss. Athleticism is a key attribute of Jones. He can run with tight ends and slot receivers in coverage. His instincts are the main reason why his reaction time to plays is like a lightning stike. He uses his eyes to diagnose plays, but sometimes is too patient and has to run and chase. Jones will be a solid weakside backer primed to contribute on 3rd downs and is worthy of a draft pick for his special teams contributions alone. Jones could improve his stock dramatically with a great week.

  1. Antonio Morrison, Florida
  2. Eric Striker, Oklahoma
  3. Josh Forrest, Kentucky

Cornerbacks


Jalen Mills, LSU

Mills missed most of his senior season with a fractured fibula. A 4-year starter, Mills transitioned from corner to free safety last year and has fits better in a zone coverage scheme. He plays the ball very well and is suited for FS position due to his football IQ, even though he’s listed as a cornerback on the Senior Bowl roster. He can pack a punch for a smaller safety. Mills has the athleticism to fly around with very good range and can support in the running game despite being subpar at finishing tackles. Mills has a very high ceiling and could be a solid mid-round pick up as a nickel cover guy or as a free safety, and I’d expect him to get time at corner and safety during practices.

Cyrus Jones, Alabama

Thriving most as a dangerous punt returner for the Crimson Tide, Jones’ dynamic return skills stem from confidence in his reads and remarkable acceleration to his top speed. As a cornerback, Jones is an athletically gifted and speedy cornerback whose footwork in underneath and comeback routes coupled with poor footwork and timing in vertical routes stunt his NFL upside. His willingness to be physical and as an effective tackler will make him a solid cornerback prospect, but one that will need time and safety protection early and often during his NFL career.

Harlan Miller, Southeastern Louisiana

Miller is one of the better run defending cornerbacks in attendance at the Senior Bowl despite not boasting great bulk or size. Playing away from his frame to explode through receiver contact and finish at the ball carrier, Miller is highly effectively in off coverage as a run and pass defender. He’s a bit indecisive at times, and could be susceptible to more polished receivers in attendance, but he fires his hands well through coverage and should be able to make-up for missteps with plus ball skills

  1. James Bradberry, Samford
  2. Jonathan Jones, Auburn

Safeties


Jeremy Cash, Duke

Cash is an all-around football player with a muscular and filled out frame. He plays the run like a linebacker and plays the pass like a safety. The Two-Time All-American has a had a stellar collegiate career filled with an abundance of accolades such as 2015 ACC Defensive Player of the Year which are the result of his ability to consistently create turnovers, make TFL’s, sacks PBU’s and tackles. Cash reminds a bit of Tyrann Mathieu due to his position versatility, finishing ability as a tackler despite just mediocre size and range as a run-defending safety.

Sean Davis, Maryland

Offering some position and college situation similarities to Eric Rowe a year ago, Sean Davis has played cornerback and safety in his career, but may be best at safety. What he lacks in top-end hip fluidity for vertical coverage he makes up for with decisive footwork, plus-timing in coverage and a knack for dislodging the ball on underneath routes, Davis could offer value at either safety spot and in the nickel cornerback spot during practices.

  1. Jordan Lucas, Penn State
  2. DeAndre Houston-Carson, William & Mary
  3. Kevin Byard, Middle Tennessee State
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
87,300
Reaction score
205,601
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
http://optimumscouting.com/draft/2016-senior-bowl-preview-north-roster-offensive-preview.html


The North Roster offers the Senior Bowl’s best (and most intriguing) quarterback prospect in Carson Wentz, three top-100 Big-Ten receivers, plus interior offensive linemen and a running back that’s quietly among the 2016 draft’s best. Here’s our 2016 Senior Bowl Preview for the North Offense.


Quarterbacks

Carson Wentz, QB, North Dakota State

A wrist injury kept him out a solid chunk of his senior season, but despite the injury and his level of competition, Wentz has already seen his name brought up as a first-round prospect. With a live arm to throw across the field, Wentz has developed plus-velocity control to work between and over/under zone coverages, though he still fastballs a bit. His vertical throws/touch are still an issue, and may persist in the NFL. Wentz’s developed velocity control, athleticism and vertical issues remind me plenty of Ryan Tannehill.

Cody Kessler, QB, USC

Kessler is one of the most straight-forward prospects in the class. He’s a clean cut West Coast passer. He much prefers to operate within the system and can really make an offense hum when he does. Though, if he is made uncomfortable, he is not dynamic or poised enough to consistently make plays. Kessler has the appropriate short-area athleticism and mental acuity to function at the NFL level in a West Coast offense. He is starting quarterback material, but there is reason to believe he can be a useful asset, both as a backup passer and a mind in the film room.

Kevin Hogan, QB, Stanford

As far as career arcs go, Hogan is an interesting prospect. During his freshman year, he got as much attention as Brett Hundley and future Heisman winner Marcus Mariota. Hogan proceeded to regress the following two years. He became more robotic in his approach and it hurt him, but it all came to fruition in his senior year. He played very close to the script, but he had taken mental steps that allowed him to be able to function well as a precision passer. Hogan lacks the natural, exciting aura of an NFL starting quarterback, though. His best fit is as an insurance policy type backup.

Jeff Driskel, QB, Louisiana Tech

The former Florida Gator found a home in Louisiana, and he’s done well to rehab his draft prospects in the LA Tech offense. Driskel got the opportunity to really utilize his vertical ball placement and bucket throws in the offense, by far his best skill set. His skittish feet and erratic placement at Florida haven’t totally subsided, but he’s shown enough with his new school potentially flash during practices.


Running Backs


Kenneth Dixon, RB, Louisiana Tech

Possessing remarkable patience, balance and stop-start ability, Dixon has emerged as sleeper-no-more in the running back class. Both in his initial hole build-up and on the perimeter, Dixon offers near-elite lateral quickness and smooth cuts to evade full impact of tacklers and regain his accleration when initially knocked off his hole. He has some timing/decisiveness question marks, but they may be due to lackluster blocking from his offensive line rather than his own doing. He doesn’t always initial contact in space with great power, which is both a positive (knows where he thrives) and a negative (limited as to the volume/situations he’s best in).

Tyler Ervin, RB, San Jose State

Ervin was been a do-it-all playmaker for the San Jose State offense just like Christian McCaffery was for Stanford this year (though obviously not to the same extent). With active feet on the interior as a runner and at the second-level, Ervin switches between big and small movements with ease, allowing him to re-accelarate easily and with power. He’s able to stay tight and get skinny as well as keep defenders off balance in the open-field enough to take advantage with physicality. He’s arguably the best third-down runner at the Senior Bowl and could be the best returner in practices as well.

Chris Swain, RB, Navy

The Navy power back was generally the man behind rushing touchdown record-breaker Keenan Reynolds. But Swain, who’s a remarkably built 6’1, 245, is a bruiser on the interior who’s role in the Navy offense was to stay low through contact and, if space opened up at the second-level, to explode north and south for as many added yards s possible. The transition from the Navy option offense to a deeper set in the backfield, always running upright and getting experience as a pass-blocker will all be on display, for better or for worse, during practices.


Wide Receivers

Braxton Miller, WR, Ohio State

In anticipation of his Senior Bowl week, I recently wrote about why Miller isn’t as much of a project prospect as some may believe. His route running, both in his upper half movement and footwork decisiveness still need drastic improvement, eh proved in his first and only season at receiver that he has naturally soft hands, remarkable elusiveness in the open field (as he proved when he played quarterback) and vertical speed to work past defensive backs in spite of lackluster routes.

Leonte Carroo, WR, Rutgers

Aside from his off-field assault issues, Carroo is receiver prospect that’s easy to see producing at the NFL level. Exploding at his route stem, repeatedly separating in mid-field routes, finishing away from his frame and embracing contact on the perimeter and in traffic, Carroo offers an NFL-readiness as a pass-catcher despite not having an overall refinement to his game. His run-after-catch and deep play ability is a bonus. He’ll be one of, if not the, most impressive receiver during practices.

Aaron Burbridge, WR, Michigan State

Connor Cook’s favorite offensive weapon in the Spartan offense, Burbridge showcased awesome ball-skills, timing and body control throughout his senior season. Lacking great size, length or vertical speed, Burbridge plays like a taller, longer receiver, but has the lower body type and occasional burst after catch to stil work on underneath and mid-range routes. How he separates vertically as well as how he matches up with longer cornerbacks in-air will be the two aspects of his game I’ll be tracking closely.

  1. Tajae Sharpe, WR, UMass
  2. Jordan Payton, WR, UCLA
  3. Chris Moore, WR, Cincinnati


Tight Ends

Nick Vannett, TE, Ohio State

While not often used in his college career, Vannett earns the benefit of the doubt in the draft process. He’s an ideally built tight end (likely around 6’6, 250 pounds) and has developed into a relatively complete player, succeeding as a run and pass-blocker, and showing patience in the seam. The draft season will define Vannett’s NFL prospects after an Ohio State career that did little for his draft grade, but he should thrive throughout the process.

  1. Bryce Willaims, TE, East Carolina
  2. Henry Kreiger-Cobel, TE, Iowa


Offensive Line

Josh Garnett, OG, Stanford

Stanford’s knack for producing high level offensive linemen continues with Garnett. Garnett is the spearhead of Stanford’s rushing attack as he is always ran behind, either from his normal left guard spot or as a pulling guard. Garnett’s menacing power and “play to the whistle” mentality make him a force as an interior run blocker. Once he gets his hands on a defender, the snap is over for said defender. Garnett is not the most fluid or high-speed athlete, but he more than meets the baseline for athleticism and he is smart enough to often compensate for his clunky movement ability. Garnett has all the makings to be the first interior linemen off the board in the spring.

Jason Spriggs, OT, Indiana

Springs is a long and lean pass blocking tackle who offers plus athleticism, evidenced by his ability to stay in front of speed rush defenders and redirect with them on their counter moves. He also has the ability to quickly anchor and stop the charge of power rushers. His major flaw is the leverage he plays with in the running game, which prevents him from being able to move defenders off the point of attack. Jason is a 4-year starter that has been a very durable and productive player for an Indiana offense that has quietly threatened most of the Big Ten’s best teams.

Joe Haeg, OT, North Dakota State

FCS national champion North Dakota State’s left tackle Joe Haeg deserves ample credit for the team’s run and pass success. Offering quick, meaningful steps off the snap and as an interior pivoting lineman, Haeg makes up for a lack of great perimeter athleticism with efficiency and reliability. He does a great job of reengaging after first contact and works hard to keep inside hand leverage, but he could be a be a bit more decisive in pass protection when meeting speed rushers and may be better suited inside or at right tackle at the NFL level. Playing with composure, plus-hand placement and active feet, Haeg has the make-up of a reliable NFL starter.

Nick Martin, OG/OC, Notre Dame

A three-year starter for Notre Dame and brother of Cowboys standout Zach Martin, Nick has similar measureables that will keep him inside at guard or center at the NFL level. A clear leader for the Notre Dame offense and has experience making calls at the line, Martin is an adequate bender and upfield run blocker. He relies on efficient steps to his block as well as plus-hand quickness, especially from the center position post-snap. Martin is a heady interior blocker who makes up for a lack of great athleticism with refined mechanics and tenacity to his game. He may struggle in some drills during practice, but he could be a top-100 center prospect.

Kyle Murphy, OT, Stanford

Murphy played the left tackle spot next to Josh Garnett, and could be doing the same during Senior Bowl practices. Murphy brings the same power to his game that Garnett does, making that side of the line a terror for opposing teams. His punch can be deadly, both in placement and in power. Murphy does not quite have the same footwork refinement as his counterpart, though. Murphy can get flat-footed, both as a pass blocker and run blocker. Sluggish footwork aside, the power and understanding of his position that Murphy displays is going to make him a valuable asset to an NFL team.

  1. Joe Dahl, OG/OT, Washington State
  2. Jack Allen, OC, Michigan State
  3. Cole Toner, OT/OG, Harvard
  4. Willie Beavers, OG, Western Michigan
  5. Austin Blythe, OC, Iowa
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
31,979
Reaction score
27,952
The most intriguing prospect is Noah Spence. If he is there in round 2 there would be temptation.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
87,300
Reaction score
205,601
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
http://optimumscouting.com/draft/20...-by-jacoby-brissett-and-sterling-shepard.html


The South Roster offers two potential “project” quarterbacks, a running back who was among the country’s best before a season-ending injury, the best small school receiver in the 2016 draft and loads of offensive line talent, especially at guard.

Quarterbacks

Jacoby Brissett, NC State

At times, Jacoby Brissett draws stark similarities to Ben Roethlisberger, his ceiling as a prospect and a projection that some feel isn’t too lofty. He’s a plus athlete in and outside the pocket, is a highly skilled passer on the move (primarily when rolling to his right) and, as a streaky passer, can have drives where his placement, poise and decision-making (including when to run or pass) can really threaten any defense in the country. But his indecisiveness along with over-reliance on his first-read gets him into trouble. His flashes over the last two years should have scouts excited, but showing a next-level control, confidence and accuracy during Senior Bowl practices could get him into the second-round discussion.

Dak Prescott, Mississippi State

Seeing Prescott develop over the years has been a treat. When he first attained the starting job, he was not much more than a strong athlete with a nice arm. Prescott, in his final year, looked much more mentally adept than ever before. He was not holding the ball as long and was getting the ball where it needed to be more often than not. Obviously, there is still a lot to work on for Prescott, namely in the department of getting consistent accuracy out of him, but his athletic traits and the confidence that he exudes are more than enough to want to bring him in as a developmental backup quarterback.

Brandon Allen, Arkansas

Much like Hogan, Allen has the makings to be quality backup. He flows smoothly within the structure of the play, but he needs that structure. When structure is there for him to lean on, Allen looks confident and sharp, but he is not so impressive when forced to improvise. There is nothing wrong with that. The league is in dire need of reliable backups and Allen can be that for a team, given proper time to adapt to the system. His experience in a traditional pro-style offense should help his adjustment.

Jacob Coker, Alabama

Coker may have been a part of a national championship winning team, but he has a long way to go before he can operate in the NFL. Though he slowly got better as the year went on, Coker struggled as a passer in 2015. His accuracy was as erratic as could be and his timing, both with sensing pressure and knowing when to throw, was poor. His progress, so to speak, was diminished by his performance versus Clemson; a game in which he crumbled on the biggest stage of his career. Coker’s appeals are his arm and size, but he has yet to show NFL traits beyond his physical gifts.


Running Backs

Jonathan Williams, Arkansas

Johnathan Williams is more of a power back than elusive. A big, durable rusher who runs through defenders and has good lateral quickness. A between-the-tackles runner he won’t make many miss, but he will fight for tough yards. One of the top senior backs in the nation that had over 1,100 yards last year, but was lost for the season due to foot injury. Williams has solid vision reading blocks and is patient enough to hit holes and hits holes hard. It’s worrisome to see where he fits as an every down back because he isn’t the best in pass pro or as receiver in the check down.

Aaron Green, TCU

With what looks like legit low 4.4 speed, Green offers high-end big-play speed out of the backfield, requiring plus blocking initially to work on the interior. He tends to shy away from big contact, both as an interior runner and when playing on the perimeter. Green offers awesome one-on-one elusiveness, but it’s the lack of contact aggressiveness that worries about his NFL future.

Kenyon Drake, Alabama

After suffering a broken leg in 2014, Drake dealt with nagging leg injuries in 2015, a major concern for NFL teams. A taller, leaner rusher, Drake offers dynamic running ability as a running back, pass-catcher and returner, and certainly made his presence felt on special teams against Clemson. His special teams upside will be the reason he gets drafted, but a strong week in Mobile, likely with ample fan support, could force more teams to consider him a mid-round running back worth drafting.


Wide Receivers

Sterling Shepard, Oklahoma

Shepard is one of the best route-running receivers in recent draft history, as he thrives in multiple aspects of route separation. He’s decisive in his build-up and eventual break steps, consistently escaping hand contact designed to dislodge him. He’s able to change speeds at the top of his routes, setting up double moves naturally and without hesitation. And when his quarterback is in trouble, he’s the best college receiver I’ve ever seen at coming back to the ball, adjusting off his initial route, and giving his quarterback a throwing lane. Length, size and timed speed limitations may not help his draft process, but Shepard has a long-term home in the NFL as a starter.

Paul McRoberts, SE Missouri State

Our top rated small-school receiver, McRoberts got the late call-up from the Senior Bowl which forced him out of the East-West Shrine game week ago. Clearly dominating his level of competition in college, McRoberts offers smooth vertical athleticism, natural finishing ability away forms frame and after-catch running upside on film. He’ll have to answer level of competition concerns from NFL-level cornerbacks, especially physicality-wise, and show off route polish and development, but his smooth athleticism and finishing ability away from his frame should make him an early impact in the NFL.

Malcolm Mitchell, Georgia

A once remarkably talented athlete who played both sides of the ball earlyin his career and seemed destined for a first-round pick, Mitchell now appears to be an unrefined and injury-prone prospect. He’s college routes were primarily vertical, deep post and underneath routes, and it’s unclear whether the 6’0 receiver can get separation at the NFL level. Still, when healthy, Mitchell’s vertical speed and ball skills flash of an NFL starter. A strong Senior Bowl coupled with strong injury checks at the NFL Combine could push him into the early rounds once again.

  1. Jay Lee, Baylor
  2. Charone Peake, Clemson
  3. KJ Maye, WR, Minnesota


Tight Ends


Jake McGee, Florida

A 6th year senior transfer from Virginia, McGee is intriguing because he fits the mold of a Chris Cooley type of Tight end/H-back. He can be moved around the offense and can create mismatches along the edge or across the middle vs. linebackers. Hands-catcher that will go up and grab the ball. Plus athletic ability for a tight end that can create separation due to plus route running. He can be a big weapon at the next level on 3rd downs and this year has been Florida’s most consistent receiver. McGee’s weakness lies strictly in the running game as he is a well below-average blocker with poor strength. But in a Senior Bowl setting, McGee could quickly grow into one of the quarterbacks’ favorite targets.

  1. Glenn Gronkowski, Kansas State
  2. Jerrell Adams South Carolina


Offensive Linemen

Cody Whitehair, OG, Kanas

Whitehair plays left tackle for Kansas State and shows the necessary punch, strength, and speed combination to make it stick at the next level. However, not having the best measurable may make him a better prospect at guard for the NFL. Whitehair has brute strength and hand placement that allows him to control defenders and get to the next level in the running game. He plays with a certain nastiness that you love to see in an offensive lineman and could be a top 50 pick in the upcoming draft. Whitehair’s versatility and ability to do everything well as a left tackle earned him his Senior Bowl invitation, and he’ll look to leave as Mobile’s best blocker.

Vadal Alexander, OG/OT, LSU

Alexander has been very versatile along the offensive line for LSU. He’s started at both guard positions and this year as right tackle, and offers plus run blocking and can be inserted at either guard. Strengths of his game include being a mauler on edge defenders often gobbling them up with his large frame and brute strength. He can get to the second level and take you of play. In the passing game he can adjust to stunts and inside rushes well, but struggles vs. speed rushers on the edge due to sluggish footwork and a below average slide step, which will likely keep him from becoming an NFL left tackle. Best suited as a guard in a rushing attack where he can create running lanes and show off his strength.

Le’Raven Clark, OT/OG, Texas Tech

Clark has rare size, athleticism, and length at nearly 6’7” and 315 lbs. The film shows a solid pass blocker who can adjust to counter moves very effectively and quick run blocker. Clark has good bend on the edge and good foot quickness to slide over for speed rushers. Clark is a 3-time all-conference selection, but there’s a question as to which position he’ll play at the NFL level. How he kick slides against speed rushers will determine if he’s a tackle at the NFL level, but his efficiency as an upfield blocker and keeping inside leverage strong should make him one of the more impressive blockers in Mobile.

Connor McGovern, OG, Missouri

Playing with plus power at the line of scrimmage to handle bigger interior defensive linement and staying balanced and fluid at the second-level, McGovern might be a better prospect than rookie standout and former Missouri Tiger Mitch Morse. McGovern is a tremendously strong interior blocker who could offer NFL value at right tackle too. Along with a strong week in Mobile, I’d expect McGovern to shoot up draft boards at the NFL Scouting Combine.

John Theus, OT, Georgia

An experienced starter in the SEC at left tackle, Theus is a massive left tackle prospect who offers great length, bulk and experience that NFL teams will covet. However, despite his bulk, he doesn’t play with great initial strength off the snap, coming off a bit high and not driving with his legs all that effectively. He also doesn’t show, at least on film, a nastiness that most Georgia (and many SEC) offensive linemen show. He’s a near lock to be drafted based on his experience and length, but he could be one of the more abused left tackles in Mobile if he hasn’t worked on that core strength between his season’s end and practices.

  1. Christian Westerman, OG, Arizona State
  2. Sebastian Tretola, OG, Arkansas
  3. Spencer Drango, OT/OG/OC, Baylor
  4. Evan Boehm, OC, Missouri
  5. Graham Glasgow, Michigan
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,077
Reaction score
84,676
The most intriguing prospect is Noah Spence. If he is there in round 2 there would be temptation.


His drug problems are a problem imo.

You give this guy money and who knows with this guy.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,756
Reaction score
21,941
Carson Wentz seems to have the physical tools and he has a decently quick release. (not Romo like, but decent and can probably be sped up) I haven't really watched much of him at all, but he looked decent. His accuracy is off a bit, and you really have to give his receivers credit. They adjust to his throws well. The QB runs are stupid though. Not only that, he is dangerous when he does it. Taking a lot of unnecessary risks.
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
31,979
Reaction score
27,952
Defensive Line


One of the best positions in this draft, and the talent in Mobile backs it up. I have to start with Sheldon Rankins out of Louisville. If I had to put money down on one prospect to catch everyone’s attention this week, it is Rankins. I think he dominates one on ones. Rankins is ahead of the game in terms of hand use. I am not calling Rankins Kawann Short, but they win in similar ways: pass rushing awareness and intent to lift, catch and separate a blockers hands in order to gain the balance and positioning advantage.


Next I would place Louisiana Tech’s Vernon Butler. Again, I am not calling him Mo Wilkerson, but they move and win in a similar fashion. Butler can be slippery with secondary movements to disengage and capitalize on a hesitant quarterback. Butler will also win with his hands and length on his primary move off the snap. I think a first-round pick might be in his future.


Illinois’ Jihad Ward is super intriguing. He might play on the edge for some, but there’s a feeling that most of his disruption and impact will be in sub-packages from the interior. When he is on, watch out. I definitely have a type with these outside-inside prospects.


Penn State’s Austin Johnson profiles as a 1 technique in an even front. He has some upfield ability out of that position, which can be difficult to find, to go along with his run stuffing skills at the line of scrimmage.


This is just another occurrence of siding with the lesser discussed talents rather than the bigger names. Among those big names are Adolphus Washington and Jarran Reed. I just did;t see it with Washington this season. At all. I like Reed, but consider him a role player. 20-35 snaps a game as a line scrimmage run stuffer, depending on game flow. Maybe he shows something different this week, but I see teams find those types in free agency or late in the draft each year.

Top 20


1. Louisville DT Sheldon Rankins

2. EKU EDGE Noah Spence

3. Oklahoma WR Sterling Shepard

4. Louisiana Tech DL Vernon Butler

5. NDSU QB Carson Wentz

6. Penn State DL Austin Johnson

7. Utah State EDGE Kyler Fackrell

8. Louisiana Tech RB Kenneth Dixon

9. Kansas State OL Cody Whitehair

10. LSU LB Deion Jones

11. Alabama LB Reggie Ragland

12. Stanford T Kyle Murphy

13. Illinois DL Jihad Ward

14. Michigan State C Jack Allen

15. Washington St OL Joe Dahl

16. Alabama DL Jarran Reed

17. Stanford G Joshua Garnett

18. Temple CB Tavon Young

19. San Jose State RB Tyler Ervin

20. Missouri LB Kentrell Brothers


http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/cfb/59941/351/senior-bowl-week?pg=3
 
Top