Should Jimmy Johnson go into the Ring of Honor?

Without question.

He'd have already been in had putting him there not directly conflicted with Jerry's agenda of taking credit for rebuilding the team in the early 1990's

It's ridiculous to say it was Jerry who recruited all those coaches, engineered all those trades, hoodwinked Mike Lynn out of all those draft picks, talked Casillas out of retirement, traded a weak-***** QB like Steve Walsh for real draft picks, scouted all those ex-Florida players, or rode his team hard when they needed it time and again.

Jimmy's charisma dominated all those other strong egos and created one of the greatest teams of all time.

It's a tragedy he didn't stay and win four Lombardi's in a row like everyone in the sporting world, fan or otherwise, knows he would have.
 
JackWagon;4606041 said:
Jimmy is now all about fishing off his boat in the Keys. He could care less about the ring of honor.

I completely disagree with that. He'll never campaign for it, but it would mean something to him if it did happen.
 
This is one of the easiest questions ever.

Yes.

Without any doubt.

He should already be in there, IMO.


The guy coached the team to back to back Superbowl victories and left a lot of key people in place that allowed the team to win a 3rd in four years.

I honestly can't even imagine a single argument that is even remotely logical against him being in.
 
Hostile;4605442 said:
Jimmy's former players are lobbying Jerry to do exactly that. Of course he's going to be.

And not just any former players but the biggest and most well known, with media access to boot:

Troy Aikman: "I know I speak for Michael, Emmitt ... if we deserve to be in it (ROH), then Jimmy certainly does."

[YOUTUBE]YY9OHhCkmTM[/YOUTUBE]
 
Only room for one coach in the ring for. Now, IMO.

Tom Landry IS the Dallas Cowboys, and he went in posthumously.

So we were dominant for 3 SBs and a decade due to drafting, not coaching by Jimmy. Landry's team went to the playoffs 17 consecutive years!

I would be sick to see Jimmy up there with Tom; he can wait and go in posthumously as well, if at all.
 
Chuck 54;4606515 said:
Only room for one coach in the ring for. Now, IMO.

Tom Landry IS the Dallas Cowboys, and he went in posthumously.

So we were dominant for 3 SBs and a decade due to drafting, not coaching by Jimmy. Landry's team went to the playoffs 17 consecutive years!

I would be sick to see Jimmy up there with Tom; he can wait and go in posthumously as well, if at all.

Jimmy did that drafting too though.
 
This is actually a tough call IMHO.

Jimmy was a great coach here and built a short-lived dynasty.

My only issue is his lack of commitment to the Cowboys. He couldn't leave Texas fast enough (even though he was born and raised here). A Ring of Honor recipient really should be a long-time organizational standard. I wouldn't have added Haley even.

I'd much rather add 70's Cowboys who were here 10 years than a coach who was here 5 years and only ever had 3 winning seasons BUT 2 monstrous SB titles.

All that said he really re-built the brand and the mystique. He basically invented swagger both at Miami and here. So he represented that era so well even if it was for such a short period of time.

I'd lean to yes but not up next. May need to see Jerry win a title sans Jimmy influence to ever see Jimmy get in.
 
Chuck 54;4606515 said:
Only room for one coach in the ring for. Now, IMO.

Tom Landry IS the Dallas Cowboys, and he went in posthumously.

So we were dominant for 3 SBs and a decade due to drafting, not coaching by Jimmy. Landry's team went to the playoffs 17 consecutive years!

I would be sick to see Jimmy up there with Tom; he can wait and go in posthumously as well, if at all.
I respect your opinion, but find it utterly ridiculous. Landry was alive and well when inducted into the ROH. Schramm went in posthumously. In any event, Jimmy Johnson belongs in the Dallas Cowboys ROH because of what he did for the organization. Landry's greatness does not erase what Johnson achieved. They should both be in the ROH. My only problem is that Johnson has distanced himself from the organization a bit too much for my liking. I realize Jerry's presence is a factor, but Johnson could have at least appeared at the Hall of Fame ceremonies for the players who helped him prove his own greatness.
 
jterrell;4606685 said:
This is actually a tough call IMHO.

Jimmy was a great coach here and built a short-lived dynasty.

My only issue is his lack of commitment to the Cowboys. He couldn't leave Texas fast enough (even though he was born and raised here). A Ring of Honor recipient really should be a long-time organizational standard. I wouldn't have added Haley even.

I'd much rather add 70's Cowboys who were here 10 years than a coach who was here 5 years and only ever had 3 winning seasons BUT 2 monstrous SB titles.

All that said he really re-built the brand and the mystique. He basically invented swagger both at Miami and here. So he represented that era so well even if it was for such a short period of time.

I'd lean to yes but not up next. May need to see Jerry win a title sans Jimmy influence to ever see Jimmy get in.

I agree with you completely.
 
Jerry wil not EXTENZE Jimmy a invite to join the ring of honor..
 
I predict that what Jimmy did will never be repeated by a Cowboys coach ever again. He drafted, assembled, and coached an "all-world" team that won 2 back-to-back Super Bowls with him and that team won a third (even with "Jethro" coaching and eating hotdogs on the sideline).
 
Ultimately NO, because he chose to leave. He himself to this day will admit that his departure was mutual.
 
AMERICAS_FAN;4606874 said:
Ultimately NO, because he chose to leave. He himself to this day will admit that his departure was mutual.

I don't have a problem with him choosing to leave. We don't know what went on behind the scenes. What bugs me is how he has literally stayed away from all things Cowboys. Ultimately, that is his choice too, but it sort of bugs me.
 
Chuck 54;4606515 said:
Only room for one coach in the ring for. Now, IMO.

Tom Landry IS the Dallas Cowboys, and he went in posthumously.

So we were dominant for 3 SBs and a decade due to drafting, not coaching by Jimmy. Landry's team went to the playoffs 17 consecutive years!

I would be sick to see Jimmy up there with Tom; he can wait and go in posthumously as well, if at all.

Completely asinine rationale.
 
Without question. 5 years is a long time in football. He would've been here longer if Jerry wasn't such an egotistical clown.
 
Chuck 54;4606515 said:
Tom Landry IS the Dallas Cowboys, and he went in posthumously.


Tom Landry was still alive when he was inducted into the ROH.
 
BAT;4607907 said:
Completely asinine rationale.

I do agree with one thing he said there should only be one head coach in the ROH and that's Tom Landry. He dedicated 28 years of his life to the Cowboys and never walked away from the team. Jimmy never stayed longer than 5 years with any team he coached.

He left the Cowboys because of his own doing. I appreciate everything Jimmy did with the Cowboys but to see his name along side Tom Landry in the ROH wouldn't set very well with me. A player or a coach has to put in more than 5 years to get into the ROH in my opinion. There's other ways Jimmy can be honored for what he did in Dallas.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,610
Messages
14,547,686
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top