alancdc
Active Member
- Messages
- 3,295
- Reaction score
- 5
Real1st;2224301 said:I don't know if this is an mistake but this has to be downright pathetic for a lineman
Being here in Carolina I believe that weight should have been 350.
Real1st;2224301 said:I don't know if this is an mistake but this has to be downright pathetic for a lineman
InmanRoshi;2224330 said:You're talking about players who couldn't make far lesser talented rosters."
BAT;2224399 said:Dan Morgan, if recovered from his achilles tear, would be a FINE BACKUP. IF HEALTHY, he would be a super upgrade to either Burnett or Carpenter. He could also backup James. Morgan did NOT retire over concussions, go and look it up, Morgan would have played for the SAINTS THIS SEASON if his leg responded quicker to treatment.
starfrombirth;2224537 said:He originally DID retire because of concussions ( I saw the interview on "Outside the lines") He came back but shouldn't have. He is a head hunter true but he tackles with his head and is a concussion waiting to happen. No thanks to Morgan.
BAT;2224293 said:Jerry needs to get quality experienced depth players for this SB run.
Sign:
OG Toniu Fonoti 6'4 350
- already experienced and SUCCESSFUL in Houck's scheme
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfldraft/tracker/player?id=4117
QB Chris Simms 6'5 230
- not crazy about him as 2nd string, but more than capable 3rd
WR Ashley Lelie 6'3 200 4.35
- Dallas needs a deep speed complement to T.O., Lelie's 17.2-yards-per-catch average is the highest among active NFL receivers (his main problem is he is injury prone)
ST/LB Carlos Polk 6'2 260 4.78
- ST madman & very familiar w/Wade's scheme
http://tsn.sportingnews.com/nfl/articles/20010405/307945.html
Sign & Place on IR:
OL Charles Spencer 6'4 340
- versatile: can play OG & OT; great size, aggression & agility for Houck scheme
ILB Dan Morgan 6'2 245 4.55
-can play either ILB spot: heat seaking missle who is also a playmaker in coverage
Nice. Real nice. And with self promoting spam as a sig. Real impressive.dargonking999;2224307 said:How about no to all
and don't try again
ever
BAT;2224422 said:Of course we need vets, for crucial backup positions_e.g. QB, interior OL, WR, LB. We need vets b/c they are either familiar with the scheme (Houck's or Wade's), or are able to start in the NFL in case of injury.
By the by, the Cowboys are one of the youngest teams in the NFL. LEADERSHIP could be a reason why the team falters down the stretch.
Rehabbing a player for next year is alien to you? You are supposed to be the "fanatic" around here, you should know that the Cowboys were extremely successful doing this with Marco Columbo, you know, the starting RT. Teams in the NFL used to stash players w/potential on IR all the time, except in this case, these are legitimate injuries.
dcfanatic;2224841 said:So the Cowboys stashing a LB, who isn't a 34 LB, who wants to retire because of VARIOUS injury concerns would be the same situation as we were in at Right Tackle when we took a chance on Colombo?
What about the first round and a second round draft picks backing up the starters that are already on the football team who have been with the team for some time now?
Nice reach, but it was strike three and you're out...
Of your mind if you think the Cowboys want anything to do with Dan Morgan, lol.
BAT;2225008 said:First of all, I don't get the patronizing tone, did I insult you by putting my opinions on this board? Secondly, why can't you see the similarities between Columbo and Morgan? Fact is, Morgan has had a much more productive career than Columbo EVER had before signing w/the Cowboys. Many thought that Columbo's injury was a career ENDER and that he was another busted first round pick. Columbo puttered around on the Bear's roster, on the IR as much as the playing field for SEVERAL seasons. When in fact, Columbo just needed to get off the field and concentrate on rehab for an entire year. Morgan's concussions & various injuries (its his achilles right now) are of concern, but if healthy, he would be a tremendous backup. Cowboys are one of the very few teams who can take this risk. If it doesn't pan out, what do the Cowboys lose_James Marten? Alan Ball? If it does pan out, the Cowboys have a pro bowl player who plays w/speed, suddeness and hostility, all traits that have been sadly lacking in Cowboys LB depth. IMO, the risk of losing players like Marten or Ball is worth that.
Seriously, this is the cherry on your argument?? Burnett, a FA next season looking for a big payday and a starting position, AND CARPENTER????
Not admitting a mistake is even more foolish than the actual mistake. Carpenter WAS A MISTAKE.
Unlike others here, I have never professed to have any inside info/influence with the Cowboys, all I am offering are my thoughts and reasons.
The baseball metaphor was a nice touch though, my handle being BAT and all.