there is an uncanny similarities between this team and the team of the 90's and how it was built. obviously in the 90's we didn't have salary cap to deal with and trades were more frequent (and more willing partners), but Johnson completely turned over the roster and built a deep, talented young team through the draft. even down to the players and positions. I am stating the obvious, but aikman, emmitt....dak zeke. a brash experienced WR in Irvin and suddenly Bryant is the sr. member of the trio with the passion and fiery attitude. and similarly this team has been built through the draft.
aikman and emmitt were just having fun and seems the same with Zeke. the great OL of the 90's and that's what we have and that line was built before arrival of the triplets. a deep Wr group, that although none would be a primary receiver are capable of hurting the defense and need to be accounted for. even Beasley, a smallish WR with speed is similar to Kevin Williams in the 90's. and of course Novaceck compared to Witten. both Sr. members of the teams.
and now the defense is eerie similar. the secondary was deep and this secondary seems the same way. the strength was in Woodson, a heady cover safety who Byron Jones reminds me of. and the DL, deep. people forget how we continuously rotated the DL in the 90's wearing out offenses as opposed to the Offense wearing out the defense. 4th quarters was when we closed deals and we saw some of that last year. the one missing ingredient then was a dominant pass rusher and we got Haley. seems like we are in the same place and trying to swing for the fences with Taco Charlton.
and I think this team, despite the ending grew up a lot last year. they learned to win games. they learned they are able to come from behind and win. they learned they can close games. they started to believe in themselves. and we lost in the playoffs in 91, to Detroit. a team we had faced earlier in the year. the team grew up in that playoff year.
Does this guarantee a superbowl appearance, or win this coming year? no. playoffs are playoffs. there are no guarantees and plus this is the salary cap era, the all teams are equal era. but I can't help to see the uncanny similarities between the two team and how they were put together.
and the last point is on garrett, which I am sure will stir emotions. Johnson was a geat coach, but he also had a great staff. great coordinators, Turner, Butch Davis, Dave Wandstedd, a lot of whom went on to become head coaches, although not seeing the same success, they were great coordinators. Johnson was more of a manager, maestro than involved in game planning, play calling, etc. he put his staff together and he trusted them. He managed the team culture, the vision, players and made sure it was all about competition and football.
Garrett is in similar position, he has two former head coaches, who didn't succeed as head coaches, but were great coordinators. he is now more of a manager and maestro. He has learned to trust his coaching staff, has created a vision and build a culture around competition and football. We should expect that, as he played and learned under Johnson.
hopefully, this team learned from their playoff loss last year and will show the ability to get over the hump and bring home the 6th trophy. there is just this feeling about this team. they are just having fun playing football.
I agree with most of what your saying and have thought the very same thing. The defense is obviously the only thing that's holding this team back from reminiscing the glory days of the 90s. Although I could project certain players to fit the 90's mold, they just haven't proven it... yet. As an optimist, I hope they turn that corner this year.
Problem here is.. when you compare the Great 90's teams/players to modern day, folks lose their minds. Even though, it is only natural to compare past to present as a 'measuring stick' for today's Cowboys. As great as the triplets were, it's was our defense (Haley, Tolbert, Woodson, Brown, Marion, Sanders, Maryland, etc) that helped beat the 49ers and GB in the playoffs and propelled us to the Super Bowl. I'm happy to see the improvements we made defensively last year, but they have to prove it in the playoffs to be legit.
As far as the offense is concern, an argument can be made that the 2016 team was better than any of the 90s teams.
QB- Aikman is the man, no doubt. He was a General and leader on the field..and probably the real glue of 90s teams. Although he didn't put up gaudy yards, he was considered one of the more accurate passers of his time. That said, no rookie QB has ever done what Dak did last year. For that matter, Aikman statistically never had a season like that his entire career. Dak hasn't won a SB(or three)though, but last years lost to GB definitely wasn't his doing either. His future is definitely brighter than Aikmans rookie season. The projections are limitless.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/A/AikmTr00.htm
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PresDa01.htm
RB- Both Emmitt and Zeke have/are benefiting from the best OL of their times. Both are outstanding at what they do. Hindsight is 20/20 when it comes to Emmitts performances, But Zeke could easily become the next great Cowboys RB if last year is any indication. Zeke had 1994 yards from scrimmage and was held out the final game of the season. Emmitt broke 2k yscm twice his career. Zeke avg over 5ypc.. Emmitt, only once in his career.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SmitEm00.htm
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/E/ElliEz00.htm
TE- as much as I loved Novacek in the past, there's no comparison to Witten. IMO, Witten is the goat.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/N/NovaJa00.htm
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WittJa00.htm
WR- as far as the Dez and Irvin comparison, Irvin has that locked down. Although, both players have similar intangibles or 'heart' as most would say. Irvin just knew how to stay on the field. But there is a reason why Irvin himself calls Dez his son. Definitely comparable.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/I/IrviMi00.htm
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BryaDe01.htm
OL- Well, i won't compare the two because there's really no need. Both groups are considered the best of their respected era's
I understand that some won't see it this way, but that's ok. It's just opinions either way. At the end of the day, I see improvements happening every year. We have a very good, very young, very motivated team right now. That alone gets me excited for the season. Add are modern day triplets and OL to and improved defense and we might be lifting hardware by seasons end.