burmafrd said:
The mandatory laws came about because too many judges were soft and let killers and rapists and child molestors out with a slap on the wrist. Sort of like that case up in Vermont where a creep had been abusing a 10 year old girl since she was 6 and a piece of crap judge decided 60 days was enough jail time. Then he said the man could be treated- which is pathetic since studies have shown that pedophilia cannot be treated in any more then maybe 15% of the cases- and even that is in doubt. THOSE are the kind of things that lead to mandatory sentencing.
Bingo ! That is why they are pushing for Jessica's law in Vermont. Mandotory sentences keep judges from doing what is described in Vermont above here.
From what I have read on the case...and take this with a grain of salt, I'm not a lawyer. Taylor was brandishing a firearm (in other words, he pulled out the gun). According to witness's, he did not FIRE the gun, but threatened the suspect (Who supposedly stole his Quads) with the gun.
This type of offense (Pulling out the gun) is punishable with a 3 year mandotory sentence. You need not fire or use the gun to be charged, just pulling it out and threatning with it is what the 3 year charge is all about.
If he had fired the gun the charge would have been a mandotory 10 years.
Skins and Terps is cool folks, he's not backing Taylor from what I read, just reporting what he knows.