silver
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,876
- Reaction score
- 1,700
Primetime0201;2378247 said:I hear Brooks will most likely take over per Jerry's "request"...
good. first time i agree with coach jerry's meddling.
Primetime0201;2378247 said:I hear Brooks will most likely take over per Jerry's "request"...
silver;2378478 said:good. first time i agree with coach jerry's meddling.
theebs;2378404 said:I know I am in the minority here, but I dont understand the desire for bollinger to play. Actually I do, but I dont think it is logical.
I think Johnsons biggest problem yesterday was seeing the defense fast enough. The bucs were crowding the line and dropping guys back in coverage.
I think the giants will be much more aggressive and will give Johnson the ability to see the field quicker with easier reads. I know that sounds crazy, but I think they are just going to come down hill all day, and I think with johnson in there he may see the hole quicker.
Now I have no illusions of him throwing it all over and winning the game but I am not sure why people think bollinger is much better. He doesnt have an arm much better than johnson and he has only been in the offense for 7 weeks now.
At least with johnson if the defense plays well, we can pound the ball and hope he protects it like yesterday.
I dont personally think we can win this game with anyone other than romo so I dont think panicking and making the change to boller makes much more sense.
and if bollinger is horrendous then what? YOu just throw johnson who you gave up on after a win back out there. That doesnt seem like a smart decision.
Now if johnson throws 3 picks in the fist half, that is different. But if we play good defense and he protects the ball the game can still be respectable.
fortdick;2378492 said:Wonder if that dude in your avatar would come back for one game?