lewpac
Benched
- Messages
- 1,465
- Reaction score
- 2
silver;2718624 said:Troy was supposed to live up to his 1st pick overall billing. Of course he still deserves all the credit he gets. But at the time he was supposed to be the best QB prospect since Elway.
Romo has so far exceeded anybody's expectations being an undrafted FA from a tiny school. Having said all that, I loved Troy and absolitely love Romo now.
Until Romo performs in the playoffs like Troy did (and I believe he will), it's waaaaay premature to be having this conversation.
"Back & forths" on subjects like this is like having the unending debate of who the greatest heavy weight champ is. It's unending because we'll never know for sure. The usual names are from different era's and generations, never fought on another, etc...............so it's all relative.
That said, Troy Aikman is one of, if not THE most prolific passer in playoff history. His numbers are off the charts, far exceeding his regular season stats. THAT is the single biggest glaring thing about Troy Aikman. The stuff that they can't measure at the combine or be sure of on draft day. The leadership and big-game results that you want from any QB. Like Montana................nothing about Montana, not his arm, his legs, his size, etc............nothing "measurable" was extraordinary about the guy. But come playoff time..................................
Romo also doesn't have the coaching or mentoring that Aikman did in Jimmy Johnson and Norv Turner. Nothing even close. THAT, more than the O-line he has or the players around him, will be part of the measure of what Tony Romo is or will become.
Their personalities and style of play are also measurable different. No "cooler" cat you'll ever find than Aikman. There were no surprise's with Troy. Nothing "exotic" or dramatic. Romo is his exact opposite. He's exiting and talented, but unpredictable and is prone to turn a coach or two gray overnight. He's given me more than a few near-strokes already. Aikman is more like Johnny Unitas, Romo is more like Favre or Tarkenton.
Finally, winning three rings in this day and time is unrealistic. Free agency, salary caps, coaching carousels, etc..................too much instability in the league now. I know, I know, Brady did it and Manning's run is pretty close to Brady. Even (cough-cough) McNabb, but theyre the exceptions. Nowadays, your one, maybe two and done. Troy played toward the end of the old days in the NFL, where the team you assembled REMAINED THAT TEAM. Romo is already on his second wave of running backs, a semi-revamped offensive line, and is entering into a new day of receives to throw to.
I think if you wanted to compare Dallas QB's from Merideth through Aikman, that's one thing. Since free agency and salary caps and other parity measures kicked in (the mid-90's), it's fairer to compare Romo to the rabble we've has since Troy (Carter through Bledsoe). And, BY FAR, Romo is the best of that lot. BY WAAAAAY FAR!!!!! Not even close IMO.
Romo's gonna' get a ring. I'll put money on that. Hopefully this year. Maybe 2011, maybe 2013............who knows? But I honestly think he'll get at least one Championship. But to hold him up to the likes of Troy Aikman is a tough road to hoe. It's patently unfair to Romo, not so much that he doesn't have the talent or intangibles that Troy had. But the "era" in which he's playing....................