CFZ Speculation - 5 players that the Cowboys should look at trading

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,727
Reaction score
42,561
If a 6th
But a valid point. Some of them may be worth more as depth
Now if they aren’t gonna make your roster then obviously you trade them. McKeon may not make the roster and might bring a 6th but probably a 7th since he really just a blocker. But I’d rather have the 7th than nothing
Gallimore might bring a 6th and same with him, if you don’t see him making the roster get something for him
I wouldn’t trade Armstrong because you don’t have a proven guy to replace him and he’d be on opposite side than Sam. I’d actually use Armstrong more this year. On obvious passing downs I’d slide Dlaw inside with mazi and have Armstrong, Sam on the edges with Micah picking his spots from all over the place

And this is why the thread exists. There are a few players listed here that I'm not sure even make the squad this year as the depth in their respective spots means they could be depth cuts. So, I'd trade them so that we don't lose any value of them if we have to cut them.
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
17,736
Reaction score
24,471
Armstrong might of the lot, and it'd be smart considering that it beats outright cutting if he loses the battle to Fehoko and Land.
Armstrong is not getting beat out by either. I think people are forgetting how well he played. Plus, Fehoko is a 3Tech.

Now, if it comes down to a table on the offer for Armstrong and the Cowboys FO doesn't want to risk losing Land on cut day, then you have to consider it.

You can hold into Armstrong, the better player now, but you are risking losing a young and cheaper talent in Land (assuming he had a great camp & preseason) and still losing Armstrong to free agency after the season.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,006
Reaction score
27,361
I see people have no idea of relative value but it is good to see that Armstrong can be the new Coakley for every half baked trade idea.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
57,054
Reaction score
35,144
No one would trade for Kelvin Joseph. He has baggage and has been a bust.
 

CowboysLakerBamaFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,249
Reaction score
3,064
I think if we tell teams we want a 1st rounder for each of those guys...teams will pay it.

I have a couple of chicken legs in the fridge that are pushing a week old. I was gonna throw them in the garbage....but maybe some team will give me a 4th rounder for them.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,069
Reaction score
12,050
I think you might be able to get something for Armstrong. And I think the cap room and roster spot might be worth it. As you said, it’s a deep position on the team.

The rest are unproven or proven busts you probably couldn’t dump on anyone.
Until he is no longer the 3rd best DE on the team, I’m keeping him. Once Williams passes him, then okay. Right now, he is clearly #3 on the depth chart and #2 if Parsons plays off the ball.
 

Cowboysheelsreds058

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,025
Reaction score
2,320
Nobody is going to trade for number 2 for sure, they would wait till he is released and then maybe take a flyer on him. If so, the owner would fire the GM, as soon as he told the owner what he just done.
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,727
Reaction score
42,561
I don’t see a 4th. He means more to this team than a 4th.

Perhaps, but I just don't know. I think the biggest thing is to make sure that if there are bubble players that have trade value but are 5050 or less, to trade them before camp. That way, their value doesn't go down in cut day.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
75,438
Reaction score
69,862
Perhaps, but I just don't know. I think the biggest thing is to make sure that if there are bubble players that have trade value but are 5050 or less, to trade them before camp. That way, their value doesn't go down in cut day.
If he’s a bubble player he either fell off or someone stepped up. Hopefully it’s the latter.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
41,339
This is strictly my thoughts in my head. However, I thought it could be fun to look at 5 players that the Cowboys should look at trading. These are players who might have some trade value that are probably 50/50 to make the roster because of heavy depth in their respective positions. Right, let's begin!

  1. Neville Gallimore - I'm starting with Neville Gallimore. He's a player that we chose in round 3 in 2020. He had a solid rookie season before an injury in a preseason game forced him to miss much of 2021. Unfortunately for him, since then, we've become very well built on the Dline to the point where he has become, shall we say, potentially expendable. However, for a lot of teams, he could probably start. Additionally, his competition at DT consists of Mazi Smith (1T), Hankins (1T), Osa (3T), Golston (3T who can also be a DE), Bohanna (1T - likely won't make it), and Alacron (likely wont make it). I think we probably keep 4 DT. I think he is a player who will struggle to make this team, but could start on other teams. So, if I were the FO, I'd see if we could trade him for say a 6th round pick that can become a 5th if certain conditions are met. By doing this (and if a team were to accept), we'd be able to have a later pick that can either be used to get another late picked player or can be used to trade for a player if needed as the season goes on.
  2. Kelvin Joseph - this is a player that has special teams value who is still raw, but, unfortunately for him, is also in a similar issue to Gallimore. We have picked up a lot of depth at CB, and I think trying to offer him for a 7th that can become a 6th could be good. This allows us to move him before training camp and pick up a late draft pick so we get something for him.
  3. Dorrance Armstrong - I sense that this one might get some flack, but hear me out. He's been a solid contributor for us, and I think he can actually get us a decent return. He's had 131 tackles and 16 sacks since joining as a 4th round pick in 2018. He's still relatively young. However, unfortunately for him, his contract is up at the end of the season, and I think he is faced with a lot of competition at DE. I'd move him in a trade because his competition at DE consists of DLaw, Fowler, Sam Williams, Parsons, Golston (who can also sub as a 3T), Fehoko, and the UDFA land. That's 8 DEs! I doubt we keep more than 6 DEs going into the season. Land seems to be someone that's catching attention in minicamps so far. So, I'd see if we can get a good return for him. He's a player that I could see us fetching a nice return, especially with his age (25) and what he's done so far. I could see a team like the Panthers flipping at least a 4th for him with what they have at DE.
  4. Sean McKeon - okay, he's probably the least likely on this list to get a good return. However, I think, given his blocking abilities, that we could potentially get a 7th round pick for him. We probably only keep 4 TEs, and his competition consists of the following: Ferguson, Schoonmacher, Hendershot, Fant (rookie UDFA), Seth Green (likely wont make it), and John Stephens Jr (likely won't make it). We probably will only keep 4 TEs. So, I think we can at least get a 7th for him, and that'd be decent return.
  5. Markquese Bell - I know, I know. I like him too and we have just gotten our safety spot to being a strength. However, here's the issue. His competition consists of Kearse and Wilson. Additionally, one could also argue that DO is also a tweener at LB and SS. This means that Bell hasn't got much room at safety. He looked good in TC last year and in the preseason. So, I'd see if we can get at least a 7 for him and take it. It saved the trouble of a cut, and we would end up with a pick.
Once again, these are just thoughts that I had. I think trading at least one of these players could be a good way to add draft capital for next year. I think the most likely of these that we should trade is probably Armstrong. I like him, but I think there's just so much depth at DE for us, and teams like the Panthers, Lions, Bears, and the Falcons have terrible defences. I think anybody those 4 would likely be willing to offer a mid/late pick for Armstrong. I'd say the Panthers likely make the move. When I look at the players on the Panthers currently at DE, I think Armstrong would rather easily make that roster. Of course, I just felt this would be fun to look at our roster and look at players at spots where we have a lot of depth with whom we could get draft pick return.
I’m not a fan of trading away depth. Depth is what’s held this team back of late. But you said trade at least one of these guys which I’m totally ok with if the terms are favorable for the Cowboys.
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,727
Reaction score
42,561
I’m not a fan of trading away depth. Depth is what’s held this team back of late. But you said trade at least one of these guys which I’m totally ok with if the terms are favorable for the Cowboys.

Exactly, the terms would have to be favourable, but, if it's a player that has at least a 50% chance that they won't make the roster, but we know is too good to dare try to stash on the PS, then trading for a pick or two might be best option in that situation.
 
Last edited:

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,818
Reaction score
20,875
I think you might be able to get something for Armstrong. And I think the cap room and roster spot might be worth it. As you said, it’s a deep position on the team.
Might be able to get something real for Armstrong.

And a team would have to give us something real because his contract is under market and he'll yield a good comp pick for us anyway.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
97,645
Reaction score
100,492
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
But you said trade at least one of these guys which I’m totally ok with if the terms are favorable for the Cowboys.
Forget favorable. Anything they could get for a player about to be cut is better than nothing.

Load up on 6th and 7th rounders. Cowboys can find good players then.
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,727
Reaction score
42,561
Forget favorable. Anything they could get for a player about to be cut is better than nothing.

Load up on 6th and 7th rounders. Cowboys can find good players then.

Yes, if it's a player about to be cut or, like I said, if it's a player who has a lot of competition at his spot to where he has at least a 50% chanc or being cut, then trading is better than cutting him. Especially since Jerry's idea of FA acquisitions is trading 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks. So, why not load up on those picks for moves?
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,437
Reaction score
13,796
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Well if you were a GM of any other team which guys are you trading for? Correct none of them. You might be willing to give up a late pick for Armstrong but only if injuries pile up.
 
Top