Other QBs are getting those contracts. In other towns. Matt Ryan did.Well, if we are being real honest, I don't know that Tony gets a contract like he just did anywhere else but Dallas. I mean, it's a relative thing. It goes both ways IMO.
Good post. We are comparing a UDFA to an overall #1 pick. Agree?I hate using the cliche analogy, but his career is like a roller coaster.
No other QB's play is as wildly Jekyll and Hyde as Romo's. He can put in work and play his butt off and ball with the best, but every now and then he'll make a few mistakes in big spots that will undo all his progress in the eyes of viewers.
If Matt Schaub fails in the spotlight, it's no big deal because frankly Matt Schaub isn't that good. When Romo fails in a big spot, it's bewildering because the guy can be Aaron Rodgers like on his best days.
He's fascinating. He's frustrating. He's dumbfounding. And on top of that, he's the Dallas Cowboys quarterback.
Not only a marquee team, but a marquee team in the division with, by far, the largest market. He's going to make headlines.
Matt Ryan seems to be the only other guy that I could really compare him to, but he plays in the NFCS-- a market that is roughly 12 million strong. By comparison the NFCE reaches a market of about 38 1/2 million.
Other QBs are getting those contracts. In other towns. Matt Ryan did.
That's the QB market for a good one.
Well, if we are being real honest, I don't know that Tony gets a contract like he just did anywhere else but Dallas. I mean, it's a relative thing. It goes both ways IMO.
Good post. We are comparing a UDFA to an overall #1 pick. Agree?
Exactly. Cowboys are the most popular team so there's more attention, good and bad. I seriously doubt Tony is dating celebrities if he's QB of the Bills.Decent thread.
Romo takes crap nationally that is expected. QB of the Cowboys you're gonna get it. I just don't get the angst from our fanbase..
I do embrace it. But part of doing that is knowing when people are actually just plain delusional. It's called being educated.Exactly. Cowboys are the most popular team so there's more attention, good and bad. I seriously doubt Tony is dating celebrities if he's QB of the Bills.
And it no longer matters if he's a UDFA. He's long past that.
But who cares. I thought we were supposed to embrace the hatred anyway.
Really? I think if we don't re-up Romo, there's an absolute feeding frenzy for him. I'd be shocked if he couldn't get more with 10 teams bidding on him than he got from us directly in a restricted negotiation.
I think you are probably more right then you are wrong and that's a good point but still, I don't know that a team that he has played for would give him a 109 million dollar contract, based on the body of work he has. I'm not saying that other teams would not be interested. I'm saying it swings both ways. If your going to say that he gets scrutinized more then other QBs, I think you also have to acknowledge the fact that in Dallas, he got 4 years to develop as an UDFA and a contract that he just got in Dallas as well. Both of those things, IMO, are uncommon.
But, is it really a 109 million contract?
There are currently 33 players in the discussion as starting QBs in the NFL. Perhaps you feel there are 34 if you think that like Philly the Raiders job is wide open.
Of that number...
23 were drafted in the 1st round.
4 in the 2nd round.
3 in the 3rd round.
1 in the 6th.
1 in the 7th.
1 is a UDFA.
Someone explain to me why so many 1st round picks aren't facing the scrutiny the UDFA does without it being that HE is in Dallas, and they aren't. Even if you point out the number of pups in the 1st round who have 3 years or less as starters that isn't going to wash. Romo has been under this scrutiny since the bobbled snap in the 2006 post season, and that was his 1st year starting a single game.
Explain to me why Rivers, Schaub, Cutler, Palmer, and Vick aren't under more scrutiny. Explain to me when Ryan, Stafford, Sanchez, and Bradford are going to arrive at that scrutiny. of that list only Schaub isn't a 1st round pick, and he's a 2nd.
Note that I am not in any way touting Romo here, so you can't see this as an "excuse." I'm merely asking an obvious question. Namely, why QBs who are expected to be franchise caliber guys aren't under the same scrutiny as a guy who was a long shot to even make a team?
Just food for thought.
Decent thread.
Romo takes crap nationally that is expected. QB of the Cowboys you're gonna get it. I just don't get the angst from our fanbase.
To be fair, Chargers fans hate Rivers more than Cowboys fans hate Romo. I think both sets of fans are idiots.
In the end I think its going to work outfine for Tony. I really do. He's a millionairre beyond his wildest dreams, has a beautiful wife and child and has no doubt had a BLAST shocking the world under the brightest lights there are in the NFL. Health permitting he has another 4-5 shots at improving his postseason resume and with an org that is showing signs of getting him the support necessary.
But even if Tony Romo never wins a SB he will have had a brilliant career and life in Big D and he is grounded enough to not let unwarranted criticism by unknowledgeable fans ruin his life. He is a better man than that.
We who have watched him have far more to be thankful for than critical of. And he as a player is in the same boat.
If you are the QB of the Dallas Cowboys, the world is your oyster if you win. If you don't, then you are going to get all kinds of pressure. It comes with the territory and you know that going in. I'm sure that's part of the reason he got paid what he did but it's also something that you can't go back and complain about once you decide to play in Dallas. That's just the deal. The fans can complain about it all we won't but the reality is that this is part of the job and the more we complain, per say, the more the media will run with it.
You are right 5Stars. It's actually 120 Million. Sorry about that.