Stephen Jackson

Barber is every bit as good as Jackson, if not better.
And IMO, I'd rather have MB3.
 
hairic;1735166 said:
Getting Jackson most likely means the position of our first pick falls (we'd win more). So we wouldn't be picking at #11 with Jackson.

Team with Julius: 6-10 and drafting 11th.
Team with Jackson: 6-10? 7-9? 8-8? 9-7?

Jackson was not better than JuJo his first couple of seasons...he was average...he had a great yr last yr and this yr, well he looks average again...even before he got hurt he looked average

David
 
Spectre;1735282 said:
Barber is every bit as good as Jackson, if not better.
And IMO, I'd rather have MB3.

I agree...MBIII is a much better player right now

David
 
In the context of the trade, let's look at all affected players.

JP Losman - 1 good year, but benched a year later
Jackson - 1 great year, the rest so-so
Julius - 1 great half year, the rest so-so; will leave as UFA
Spears - 0 great years, all so-so; getting pushed by Hatcher
Ware - 2 great years and rising

That said, I'd still make the trade. Julius' half year and Ware's potential made the 'boys look like geniuses.
 
WoodysGirl;1735306 said:
In the context of the trade, let's look at all affected players.

JP Losman - 1 good year, but benched a year later
Jackson - 1 great year, the rest so-so
Julius - 1 great half year, the rest so-so; will leave as UFA
Spears - 0 great years, all so-so; getting pushed by Hatcher
Ware - 2 great years and rising

That said, I'd still make the trade. Julius' half year and Ware's potential made the 'boys look like geniuses.

Preach it sister :D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,010
Messages
14,506,410
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top