waldoputty
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,375
- Reaction score
- 21,163
Looking at game 1 results, may be the biggest disappointment on the D were the DTs.
They were supposed to be a big improvement providing more push for rushing the QB while the penetration would also stop RBs in the backfield.
The approach is to stop the run by getting to the QB.
In comparison Giants had 2 350lb DTs that handled the running game led by #1 OL in NFL...?
May be Marinelli needs to go?
He insists on quick twitch all along the DL.
You are not going to get 350LB quick DTs unless you draft really high or you pay $10/yr for free agents.
We did neither.
We drafted a 3rd pick and spent $4M for a DT.
Unless we spend those type of resources like the Giants did on the DT, you need to compromise.
Get a 1Tech who is big but quicker than Golden Cock.
With DTs with less ability to get to the QB, we need a more modern blitzing scheme.
That is not Marinelli who uses simple blitz packages.
This is sounding a lot like Ryan who we got rid of.
They were supposed to be a big improvement providing more push for rushing the QB while the penetration would also stop RBs in the backfield.
The approach is to stop the run by getting to the QB.
In comparison Giants had 2 350lb DTs that handled the running game led by #1 OL in NFL...?
May be Marinelli needs to go?
He insists on quick twitch all along the DL.
You are not going to get 350LB quick DTs unless you draft really high or you pay $10/yr for free agents.
We did neither.
We drafted a 3rd pick and spent $4M for a DT.
Unless we spend those type of resources like the Giants did on the DT, you need to compromise.
Get a 1Tech who is big but quicker than Golden Cock.
With DTs with less ability to get to the QB, we need a more modern blitzing scheme.
That is not Marinelli who uses simple blitz packages.
This is sounding a lot like Ryan who we got rid of.