waldoputty
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,375
- Reaction score
- 21,163
No one should have any confidence if Romo goes down, but they also shouldn't expect the team to put a young, proven starter behind him just in case. That doesn't happen because usually teams can't afford it and because the young, proven starter doesn't want to ride the bench for a year.
I don't expect Dallas to go whole hog after Romo's replacement until he's gone. And to be fair, it's rare that teams spend a high pick on a QB while they still have a Pro Bowl QB playing.
I do expect the team to take advantage if a first-round-worthy QB is available where we draft next year, or to take one at some point.
the fact they wanted lynch indicates that this is very well on their mind.
so basically you are betting romo will survive next 2 years or more.
if you win, then we can improve the rest of the team with additional resources - improving our chances while romo is there.
if you lose, then we waste at least 1-2 years of everyone's prime trying to nail down a new QB.
you choose the 2nd alternative.
i prefer the 1st alternative if taylor repeats his 2015 performance and is actually available...