Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.I would argue that it starts with this team allowing more sacks in the last 3 games than it had at any other point of the season.
It sure looks to me like the defenses have done a great job of containing him in the pocket recently. There are a lot of plays where he's holding the ball but there's no exit to the left or right. And it's a lot harder to throw the ball away safely when you're trapped in the pocket. When he can escape, he doesn't generally hang onto it.Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.
If we stop shooting ourselves in the foot imagine how many points we could score.
Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.
If we stop shooting ourselves in the foot imagine how many points we could score.
Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.
If we stop shooting ourselves in the foot imagine how many points we could score.
Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.
If we stop shooting ourselves in the foot imagine how many points we could score.
I understand chastising fans. You are a twitter frequenter after all.
I understand offensive penalties and their effect on drives. It is undeniable.
Nonetheless, Daks inability to complete a high percentage of passes in the RZ is a huge limiting factor as well. Dak has only 1 RZ interception and his rating is still mediocre. He doesn't throw a high percentage nor does he score often through the air down there.
We run the ball in or we are unlikely to score.
As for Romo, he completes a higher percentage in the RZ, similarly doesn't turn it over and scores a heck of a lot more.
I also do not agree on the characterization of those sacks. Against the Vikings and Giants Dak was running from ghosts and into containment after 4 seconds of pass protection. All sacks are not created equal.
It stands to reason that Romo's ability to diagnose and execute reading formation and coverages would have him get the ball out quickly or at least quickly relative to what PRescott has been doing the past month.
It's not certain and it's a moot point after Dak's performance this past week but LCD fan stupidity doesn't mean there is not a well reasoned basis for Romo.
He needs some time at Dagobah in the offseason.Although Dak is a strong runner, his movement in the pocket doesn't seem to be at Romo's level yet. Dak seems to walk into sacks.
Dak holds onto the ball too long last 3 games. Incomplete passes are far better than negative plays.
If we stop shooting ourselves in the foot imagine how many points we could score.
Although Dak is a strong runner, his movement in the pocket doesn't seem to be at Romo's level yet. Dak seems to walk into sacks.
That's because Romo falls down at any sign of pressure like a sack of potatoes. Dak is very good at climbing the pocket but doesn't have the awareness that Romo does of where ball needs to go when it gets tight.
He does take a decent amount of sacks, sacks that might otherwise be an INT. But he's not taking so many sacks that it's bogging down the offense.Although Dak is a strong runner, his movement in the pocket doesn't seem to be at Romo's level yet. Dak seems to walk into sacks.
He does take a decent amount of sacks, sacks that might otherwise be an INT. But he's not taking so many sacks that it's bogging down the offense.
For example, he threw a 3 yard pass on 3rd and long vs a sack. You like those 3 yards better? If nothing's down field and he's trapped in the pocket, he has to get rid of the ball or take a sack.
Still doesn't guarantee you overall success, and that's my point. The reason we're successful is because of the smart decisions Dak makes every game. Smart QB play is the key here. Smart QB play will win you Super Bowls.That's what Romo potentially brings to the offense right now that Dak does not--a higher probability of converting long yardage. When the Cowboys get off schedule in terms of down and distance, the drive is usually over.
In fairness, when they get off schedule, it is rarely Dak's fault; it's usually due to some penalty on the offensive line. And the league average converting long yardage isn't good anyway. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Cowboys are above average converting long yardage. I just think it's something Romo has done better recently. For Dak, it's better to take the three yard gain at this point.