Big difference three years can make.
The (5 or 6) years preceding 2008 Dallas had used a HIGH number of reasonably HIGH picks on OL and simply missed on them. Al Johnson, Peterman, Rogers, Marten et al.
So they bought high priced free agents.
Combine your own former draft picks that were hits (see andre gurode) age and bringing in guys like leonard davis, kyler kosier and you get old fast.
In 2010 they drafted 3 OL. They were trying to get younger and better but outside smith they KNEW those rookies would need work.
Regardless of what anyone thinks teams don't re-tool over night and fix every hole.
As to the Sturm take it's good anaylsis but yes the 3 year whine is silly and misplaced. A good OL wouldn't have saved this team from a crumbling defense with atrocious CB and Safety play.
It wouldn't have made Miles hammy any better. Or kept Murray or Lee healthy.
Improving ANY area of this team would have helped but 8-8 teams tend to have lots of holes and this one has.
And the fact is bad OLs like in such hard for Sturm to be aware of places as Green Bay won lots of and lots of games....
So easy for anyone to claim ownership over some major magic fix for a team finishing middle of the pack... but you give me two plus safeties and I'll argue you make the playoffs all the past 3 seasons.
See how easy that is to do? Aren't we all GMs now?
FWIW I think it is clear Leary has starting ability. He may not be ready this year and he may not be a long-term starter but he's clearly a solid member of the OL.
Frederick is more than ready to start. He'll be a plus player IMHO.
Not sure what Sturm saw of Frederick that was bad at OG. I didn't see that and watched the game 3 times now.
Free looks to have bounced back to at least a bad starting RT.
Hey, that's far better than worst OT in football which he was working hard to cement first 10 or so games last year.
What was most clear in the HOF game is OL was NOT an issue.
If those back up QBs could have hit wide open guys in the end zone the team scores 30+.