Plankton
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,318
- Reaction score
- 18,781
Bite your tongue. He's facing Romo this week.
Don't worry - Leary/Frederick/Martin will keep him from getting near Romo.
Bite your tongue. He's facing Romo this week.
NFL Channel just said the 2014 rules say a player's slate is wiped clean if they go 32 games without another infraction. This was Suh's 33rd game, believe it or not, so it was treated as a first-time infraction.
told you all yesterday it was not a big deal, shouldn't of been suspended in the first place..
I guess I'm one of the few who thinks this is probably the right move. Suh is - without a doubt - a dirty, dirty player, the dirtiest in the NFL by far. But the NFL specifically stated he should only be judged on this incident, not his past. While he clearly did it on purpose, I don't think it was enough to warrant a suspension for a playoff game. I also think it had nothing to do with the fact they are playing the Cowboys that it was overturned. In fact, I think it's in the NFL's best interest that he be suspended, and put the ratings darling Cowboys in better position to advance and play a prime time game next week. I'd rather see him vs. ZacK Martin than standing on the sidelines anyway. Dude needs a good b****-slapping.
I hope Beasley ***** slaps that 2nd rate gorilla!
what little cred the NFL had is now long gone
They wouldn't have fined him 70K if they thought it was unintentional.
The theory is that Mara has pulled strings to screw divisional rivals before. The most notable instance was the cap penalty applied to the Cowboys and the Commanders after they signed people in the uncapped year that wasn't illegal but that apparently might have broken a collusive gentleman's agreement.
according to Adam Schefter
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 29s29 seconds ago
Ndamukong Suh won his appeal; now allowed to play vs. Dallas