crazytown41
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,784
- Reaction score
- 1,206
At least Lady Gaga would get the 18-49 dem that advertisers strive for.
Cochese;3270284 said:Lady Gaga is actually pretty talented.
Avery;3270294 said:She's got the talent vocally as well as on the piano, but she's also letting her record company turn her into a joke with goofy getups and cookie cutter dance mixes.
She's making millions, but she's looking like a complete fool doing it.
Achilleslastand;3270309 said:Jay-Z ya theres a winner for ya. I cant decide if i like him or not,his poor attempts at the english language are laughable at best. Averae performance at best by the Who tonight but still better then Lady Gaga or any cRap nonsense.
trickblue;3270329 said:Actually Jay-Z is a huge Cowboy fan...
Achilleslastand;3270309 said:Jay-Z ya theres a winner for ya. I cant decide if i like him or not,his poor attempts at the english language are laughable at best. Averae performance at best by the Who tonight but still better then Lady Gaga or any cRap nonsense.
MWILL;3270335 said:BTW, you misspelled average.
Achilleslastand;3270341 said:Sorry....I am just so excited that the Aints finally won a SB in 40 yrs....that and the 12 beers will do that to ya.
Best commercial of the night, IMHO.gaylemike;3270368 said:I used to be a fan of the Who but after tonight I was wondering, did I really used to be a fan, it was terrible.
Looking forward for the Cowboys playing in SB45 and maybe Favre will have another commercial where he can't make up his mind to retire in 2025. His commercial was priceless, no the interception was priceless, the commercial was worth $2.5 million.
Now all the hoopla has begun......oh great scott Charlie Brown!!!!!!
Star4Ever;3270195 said:No, not narrow, just my opinion. What do YOU consider good music? I realize there are different tastes out there, but most of today's music is crap. How do I know this? Because it lasts about 6 months.
Aikbach;3270376 said:They've been terrible for years.
The Who sucked.
Springsteen sucked.
Tom Petty sucked.
Prince was DECENT.
Rolling Stones sucked.
Paul McCartney sucked.
Janet Jackson & Timberlake sucked.
Shania Twain & Sting sucked.
U2 was pretty powerful, especially in the wake of 9/11.
Phil Collins, Enrique Iglesias and Babyface = I did not watch.
So two half time shows this decade were watchable and entertaining/ interesting or moving.
not this 45 year old.crazytown41;3270288 said:At least Lady Gaga would get the 18-49 dem that advertisers strive for.
jchocolate82;3269663 said:To all those that did enjoy watching the Who perform during the half time I'm happy for you but it boggles my mind why the NFL doesnt have multiple genres performing during half time. Obviously it was my personal taste to not enjoy the show and you cant please everyone but for being the most popular sports league in the country with all kinds of different people watching they should make a more concerted effort to make a better show. You can have 3 different artist or groups from selected genres and make one hell of a show during the half. Like I said you can't please everyone but people shouldnt be forced to one type of music
RainMan;3270405 said:I think there's an inherent flaw when you roll out a rushed, 15-or-so-minute performance of any genre. If it's hip hop, you alienate some viewers. If it's country, you alienate some. If it's rock, you alienate some. And if you try to get some made-for-the-Super Bowl combination of the bunch, you risk *******izing each and every one of the artists you put on the stage.
Pre nipple-gate, I think the performances were at least "fun" in their own ways. Even if you didn't like the artist, they had some edge and created some interest. Now they're so safe and by the book, it's as if Bill Polian, Jim Caldwell and Co. are directing them.
I don't know how fun concerts can be when you strip them down the way the Super Bowl has.