LocimusPrime
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 34,091
- Reaction score
- 92,903
If he can help then yes, if he cannot then no. If he's better than any linebacker not named Lee, then yes. If Gachkar , Wilson, and Hitchens are better than him then no
Would he feel that way if we were 1-8? Because if not, I just can't see him being in any serious shape. Not to mention, is he really the guy we want on defense when we actually face some adversity?
The same thing was said about Hardy, and we are finding out that he may have caused a ripple effect--or at least been a part of it. Why would we invite trouble back into the locker room?I hear you... It's classic "JJ speak" lol. TBH-- I am pretty indifferent about Ro. Everybody that wants him cut now will stand up and cheer the first time he grabs an INT or gets a sack.
Every team can handle a few "bad boys"-- and so I don't think adding Ro will disrupt our chemistry. He's done his time, so I am ok with giving him another shot to stick. I'm also fine if the team moves on. Get that decision too...
The same thing was said about Hardy, and we are finding out that he may have caused a ripple effect--or at least been a part of it. Why would we invite trouble back into the locker room?
I think you might have a good point here . . . didn't we cut Quincy Carter right after a failed drug test?there are ways around it and sometimes the league just doesn't care
If he's in relatively good shape, and ready to go, IMO, it would be silly to not bring him back. We need help at that spot badly.
I think people are completely missing the fact that he could have been here in DAL working out the whole time but he never even bothered to show up for Training Camp....I have no interest in him now except getting his salary cap money back