Pottsville Maroons
Active Member
- Messages
- 718
- Reaction score
- 25
I appreciate the information provided by WVCowboy in the original post and I can appreciate his respect for the privacy of the individual in question. I was honestly surprised to see this thread still on page one since the issue that has been raised is so inconsequential.
I know there have been other posters on this board who have run into "such-and-such-player", metioning them by name, and while it is cool to have the name dropped, it doesn't make the information provided any more or less valuable since names can be made up just as easily as information or misinformation can. If people on here accept, as I usually do, that one of our fellow posters talked to so-and-so and he said this-and-that, then why can't we accept that this information is correct, as well, in spite of the anonymity of the source?
I know there have been other posters on this board who have run into "such-and-such-player", metioning them by name, and while it is cool to have the name dropped, it doesn't make the information provided any more or less valuable since names can be made up just as easily as information or misinformation can. If people on here accept, as I usually do, that one of our fellow posters talked to so-and-so and he said this-and-that, then why can't we accept that this information is correct, as well, in spite of the anonymity of the source?