Talking Cowboys video breakdown

[JeffInDC]

They said this during the game….


Michael Irvin, Jesse Holley, Greg Olsen all said this during the game.

In there kind MOFC means Ceedee needs to run the deep-in

The problem with this is the fact they arent acknowledging that they gave him a 2-deep look which calls for him to run the post.

Seriously dude, you and all these other absolute Dak haters are just getting boring at this point. Now, you all think you are better analysts than people that ACTUALLY PLAYED IN THE NFL!!!!! And, when they do make their opinions known, ALL OF YOU chime in to basically act as if you know what’s really on their heads. This is becoming sadly comical…and, the odd part is most of the people on this board AGREE Dak has issues. But, if we don’t bite at the Dak-haters “he’s the worst QB in the NFL narrative”, we’re STILL wrong. Seriously, since you and Pappy, Mountaineer Cowboy, etc…swear that y’all are the definitive word on what’s real and what’s not, you should do a podcast that shares y’all’s collective genuis with the world.

 

[WillieBeamen]

Seriously dude, you and all these other absolute Dak haters are just getting boring at this point. Now, you all think you are better analysts than people that ACTUALLY PLAYED IN THE NFL!!!!! And, when they do make their opinions known, ALL OF YOU chime in to basically act as if you know what’s really on their heads. This is becoming sadly comical…and, the odd part is most of the people on this board AGREE Dak has issues. But, if we don’t bite at the Dak-haters “he’s the worst QB in the NFL narrative”, we’re STILL wrong. Seriously, since you and Pappy, Mountaineer Cowboy, etc…swear that y’all are the definitive word on what’s real and what’s not, you should do a podcast that shares y’all’s collective genuis with the world.

Grow up


There is literally an “analyst” that was a professional that played this game that explains what I just said in the OP.

Dan Orlovsky also played in the NFL and said it was Daks fault.

 

[Dre11]

It was a cover 6

Lol...no it wasn't

 

[Zman5]

Need more

INB4 "but but but they are just protecting their QB1..." comments.

 

[Bobhaze]

General Warning Heads up- If you’ve made your “Dak points”- for or against Dak- just stop the call outs, insults, etc. You’re probably not going to change minds repeating the same points. It’s ok for people to disagree here. It’s an OPINION FORUM.

I’ve already deleted several post here.

 

[WillieBeamen]

And I still praise stanback. You're just not comprehending what he explaining. They confused Ceedee as he said and made him indecisive he made the wrong decision. clearly said that...lol GB disguised

Re-watch it again


It clearly says on the top of his tablet post snap cover 6


“Its still a 2-high read”

 

[CowboyFrog]

Because it settles what is really most important on CowboysZone. Which posters are right.

This!!! who cares who was at fault...both players came back and made good plays and had a 14 point lead going into the 4th with a top rated D...Again "The Dak war" will take center stage as we got rolled by a bad offensive unit with a 14 point lead...thats the problem.

 

[DalFan75]

GAVE

UP

31

POINTS

TO

A

BAD

TEAM

 

[RustyBourneHorse]

The bottom line here is that Moore's offense is a kiddy play set for junior league OCs.

Exactly, and a new OC was needed two years ago.

 

[Dre11]

Re-watch it again


It clearly says on the top of his tablet post snap cover 6


“Its still a 2-high read”

He said Dak was wrong based on the basic rules, but GB changed that with their coverage and confused Ceedee c because the rules changed . He even said he's going back on his word from last week. He said if Dak throws the post it's intercepted but if he throws the cross (which he did) he's good. He also said it was cover 4 . You have no clue what you're listening to or just can't comprehend basic football he never said it was cover 6...lol

 

[CowboyFrog]

Re-watch it again


It clearly says on the top of his tablet post snap cover 6


“Its still a 2-high read”

If I told you we would be winning this game 28 to 14 going into the 4th, and you had not seen any of the game, would you say "We will win this game" or would you say "What happened in the first half?" because once again who cares who was at fault they both came back and built a lead only to watch our top ranked D literally get ran over and Mossed by a failing rookie WR...seriousley this is what happened.

 

[RonnieT24]

So what defense was it genius


And its hilarious how two weeks ago, you were praising Stanbacks film study

It's usually pretty good about anything but Dak. He hates Dak for some reason. No idea why but he does. He will never give anything better than a B grade for Dak even in his best games. Still I don't know how anyone could call that coverage cover 2. The free safety directly in the middle of the field at the snap and the SS is three yards in front of him.


See for yourself:




At the snap you see the free safety bail completely out of the picture and the SS and slot corner also both retreat.




Then at the point of the throw you can clearly see that the SS breaks on the ball and that CD has plenty of time to cut across his face.





More importantly if he does and he catches it in stride he might be still running. Worst case he only has one man to beat for the TD.

Most damning to me is that he's not even looking for the ball. It's friggin 3rd and 10 and you're the #1 receiver!!! You ALWAYS gotta be looking for the ball.

 

[rambo2]

Buncha CeeDee Lamb haters in here.

And an Eagle troll.

 

[Dre11]

Re-watch it again


It clearly says on the top of his tablet post snap cover 6


“Its still a 2-high read”

And as I said , the people that drew it up ,Mike and Kellen both agreed Dak read it right.

 

[Dre11]

It's usually pretty good about anything but Dak. He hates Dak for some reason. No idea why but he does. He will never give anything better than a B grade for Dak even in his best games. Still I don't know how anyone could call that coverage cover 2. The free safety directly in the middle of the field at the snap and the SS is three yards in front of him.


See for yourself:




At the snap you see the free safety bail completely out of the picture and the SS and slot corner also both retreat.




Then at the point of the throw you can clearly see that the SS breaks on the ball and that CD has plenty of time to cut across his face.





More importantly if he does and he catches it in stride he might be still running. Worst case he only has one man to beat for the TD.

Most damning to me is that he's not even looking for the ball. It's friggin 3rd and 10 and you're the #1 receiver!!! You ALWAYS gotta be looking for the ball.

The dude is bonkers...lol

 

[rambo2]

General Warning Heads up- If you’ve made your “Dak points”- for or against Dak- just stop the call outs, insults, etc. You’re probably not going to change minds repeating the same points. It’s ok for people to disagree here. It’s an OPINION FORUM.

I’ve already deleted several post here.

You have a troll stirring the pot.

 

[Dre11]

It's usually pretty good about anything but Dak. He hates Dak for some reason. No idea why but he does. He will never give anything better than a B grade for Dak even in his best games. Still I don't know how anyone could call that coverage cover 2. The free safety directly in the middle of the field at the snap and the SS is three yards in front of him.


See for yourself:




At the snap you see the free safety bail completely out of the picture and the SS and slot corner also both retreat.




Then at the point of the throw you can clearly see that the SS breaks on the ball and that CD has plenty of time to cut across his face.





More importantly if he does and he catches it in stride he might be still running. Worst case he only has one man to beat for the TD.

Most damning to me is that he's not even looking for the ball. It's friggin 3rd and 10 and you're the #1 receiver!!! You ALWAYS gotta be looking for the ball.

What Williambean isn't getting is Isahia ultimatey said Dak made the right read.

 

[WillieBeamen]

He said Dak was wrong based on the basic rules, but GB changed that with their coverage and confused Ceedee c because the rules changed . He even said he's going back on his word from last week. He said if Dak throws the post it's intercepted but if he throws the cross (which he did) he's good. He also said it was cover 4 . You have no clue what you're listening to or just can't comprehend basic football he never said it was cover 6...lol

It clearly says cover 6 on his ipad!

And he was on the players lounge with Barry Church and they both said it was a cover 6.

28:00 mark



“They ran cover-2 on one side and cover-4 on the other side”

Also, he flat out said this WASNT what happened against Chicago

 

[WillieBeamen]

What Williambean isn't getting is Isahia ultimatey said Dak made the right read.

I am getting that. I never said anything about Dak. Isaiah clearly said IF Ceedee ran the IN it wouldve been completed.

What I am saying is he ran the route correctly BY Rule according to Isaiah. Thats what Mike, Olsen etc. arent mentioning

 

[SteveTheCowboy]

OH goal post moved those late comeback stat padding 4th str points who said score earlier, get a lead, and that real game give a defense a chance with lead.. oh wait!!!!

Nope 28 was plenty until you allow that bot very good team to literally runover you, around you, on top of you,.31 points really???that wasn't rushes goal post,.

BULL to you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i said it, meant it, and 195-0 when up by 14 in the 4th in cowboys history. now 195-1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that on the defense they blew it get over it,

if 28 and 14 lead in the 4th isnt enough LOL you are saying we needed to score 31, 32, 40 how much what's the limit , WE back to Romo and early dak years, blame it on an offense for not scoring enough( like the Denver game Romo got hit late in a what 50-48 game we lost and it was his fault on that INT?????????))))))) even when its above the league average LOL Nolan back maybe we misased him, Marinelli is that you??

right go home get away from me now ok we know you are dal hater and yet go after zeke haters
this was a historically bad defense they had the points the lead and BLEW IT...

yup dont make me go check all the posts were rush lovers loved his less then 20 point horrible 3rd down% bottom of the league scoring offense and many more 3 and outs , its ok to say Rush is better at 4-1 without seeing that nearly all those games the d held teams under 20 , now Dak back so we need o score 30? LMAO whols blind hater now?

yup YOU!

come at me and ill put you immediately on ignore. You are being that guy, same as the ones you haste ripping zeke..ok hypocrite, leave it be,.

195-0 nopw 195-1 id say that historically bad blown lead and allows a rookie to score 3 tds, runners over 200 yards, leave it be..

Wow....triggered shesh. Im not guilty of any the stuff you just made up. Couldbe the biggest rant ever. Like you just erupted about everything the board ever said that didnt like.

Ill say it again....cause im sticking to my ship same as you...

Against good teams and qbs....ww gotta put up some points and chew 4th qtr clock or there will be more of the same.

Put me on ignore bruh....its cool.