Talking Cowboys video breakdown

[RonnieT24]

So you are blindly putting words in the guys mouth that he didnt even say..

Why even comment in here if you arent even going to debate what he is saying in the video?

I'm sorry when have I put words in anyone's mouth? I have not quoted anyone to my recollection. I have simply stated that anyone who tries to declare that defense anything but single high safety at the snap is simply wrong. Because that's what it was. Nothing Stanback nor anyone else says will change the fact that Dak read and threw the ball to the spot for the in cut which if Lamb had run it he would have been about 90% sure of catching the ball or drawing a penalty since the refs had not decided they needed to start screwing the Cowboys to that point in the game. I don't need "experts" to explain football to me. I have eyes and a brain. I am not debating what Isaiah said.. I am debating what has been declared here. I don't know what he said.. If he didn't say what people have claimed he said then that's on them.

 

[RonnieT24]

Dak needs to see things more clearly for sure but you can't give him 100% of the blame if the receivers run the wrong routes or poor routes. However, on the first INT, Dak should have seen the play was messed up and thrown it out of the end zone. Take the 3 points and kick off.

Yeah I can agree with that.. This is an artifact of the new more aggressive Dak.. and I don't like it. 4 years ago he heaves that thing into the stands and takes the 3 points. Still he did continue to trust CD later in the game and it paid off in a big way.. So I can't fault him for trusting him there.. But I am starting to get a bad feeling about CD on those over the middle routes. He absolutely does not go after the ball the way he should on those and that's going to be a problem throughout his career if he doesn't change it.

 

[Mr Cowboy]

So now Sstanback is an expert? He was out of the league after his rookie year! But yeah, let's listen to this "expert. Numerous football people have already analyzed it and said what happened. But they should ask Stanback first!.

 

[Nav22]

They said this during the game….


Michael Irvin, Jesse Holley, Greg Olsen all said this during the game.

In there kind MOFC means Ceedee needs to run the deep-in

The problem with this is the fact they arent acknowledging that they gave him a 2-deep look which calls for him to run the post.

You're a buffoon who either misunderstood what Stanback said or you're too stubborn to admit you're wrong.

"The rules" Stanback is referring to is what the WR should do IF HE WENT BY WHAT THE PACKERS SAFETIES WERE SHOWING PRE-SNAP.

THEY CHANGED THEIR ALIGNMENT POST-SNAP. DAK READ IT CORRECTLY, LAMB DID NOT.

WHY ELSE would Stanback conclude that "if CeeDee runs the post, it's an interception, and if he runs the in, it's a completion"?

More evidence that the anti-Dakkers aren't very bright and simply don't know football.

 

[WillieBeamen]

I'm sorry when have I put words in anyone's mouth? I have not quoted anyone to my recollection. I have simply stated that anyone who tries to declare that defense anything but single high safety at the snap is simply wrong. Because that's what it was. Nothing Stanback nor anyone else says will change the fact that Dak read and threw the ball to the spot for the in cut which if Lamb had run it he would have been about 90% sure of catching the ball or drawing a penalty since the refs had not decided they needed to start screwing the Cowboys to that point in the game. I don't need "experts" to explain football to me. I have eyes and a brain. I am not debating what Isaiah said.. I am debating what has been declared here. I don't know what he said.. If he didn't say what people have claimed he said then that's on them.

Watch the video


He explains it perfectly and without bias towards Dak. He clearly says pre-snap showed him a single high look. Post snap you clearly see the deep safety drop back into a cover 2. The other safety is on the far hash playing 1/4 coverage.

Ceedee saw that deep safety drop back into that cover-2 zone and thats why he ran the post. The Safety that was playing quarters coverage is the one that picked the pass off. It wasnt cover 1 or 3 post snap bro

 

[RonnieT24]

So now Sstanback is an expert? He was out of the league after his rookie year! But yeah, let's listen to this "expert. Numerous football people have already analyzed it and said what happened. But they should ask Stanback first!.

Let's not be petty.. Stanback had a nice 5 year NFL career. I think he played just long enough to qualify for a pension. But dude was ALWAYS hurt. His body did NOT want him to play football. He had bad shoulders, bad feet and bad knees as I recall. As I said, he is almost always negative when it comes to Dak. He is mostly objective on other topics but when it comes to Dak it seems like he has an ax to grind, though I have no idea what it could be.

 

[Brooksey]

I'm sorry when have I put words in anyone's mouth? I have not quoted anyone to my recollection. I have simply stated that anyone who tries to declare that defense anything but single high safety at the snap is simply wrong. Because that's what it was. Nothing Stanback nor anyone else says will change the fact that Dak read and threw the ball to the spot for the in cut which if Lamb had run it he would have been about 90% sure of catching the ball or drawing a penalty since the refs had not decided they needed to start screwing the Cowboys to that point in the game. I don't need "experts" to explain football to me. I have eyes and a brain. I am not debating what Isaiah said.. I am debating what has been declared here. I don't know what he said.. If he didn't say what people have claimed he said then that's on them.

It was single high pre-snap, post snap they switched to double high safety. Based on that rule Cee-Dee was right and turned up field behind the safety, Dak was wrong thinking CD would cross the face of the defender because he read single high pre-snap.

Greg Olsen was fooled too

 

[WillieBeamen]

So now Sstanback is an expert? He was out of the league after his rookie year! But yeah, let's listen to this "expert. Numerous football people have already analyzed it and said what happened. But they should ask Stanback first!.

So link the footage of anyone breaking it down on film for us please

 

[WillieBeamen]

It was single high pre-snap, post snap they switched to double high safety. Based on that rule Cee-Dee was right and turned up field behind the safety, Dak was wrong thinking CD would cross the face of the defender because he read single high pre-snap.

Greg Olsen was fooled too

Its clear as day but they arent going to agree with you bc is casts blame on their savior

 

[IceStar-D7]

Everyone go watch the program with Nate-Everson Walls and Mick. I think it's Mick Bits or something. Nate and Walls tell you how bad Cee Dee left Dak out to be hung. Everson Walls said it's receiver like Cee Dee that made his career great. Receivers free lancing versus running the route called. #truth

 

[Brooksey]

You're a buffoon who either misunderstood what Stanback said or you're too stubborn to admit you're wrong.

"The rules" Stanback is referring to is what the WR should do IF HE WENT BY WHAT THE PACKERS SAFETIES WERE SHOWING PRE-SNAP.

THEY CHANGED THEIR ALIGNMENT POST-SNAP. DAK READ IT CORRECTLY, LAMB DID NOT.

WHY ELSE would Stanback conclude that "if CeeDee runs the post, it's an interception, and if he runs the in, it's a completion"?

More evidence that the anti-Dakkers aren't very bright and simply don't know football.

You have it wrong. It was single high pre-snap, double high post snap. In double high the receiver takes it up field, in single high he crosses the face.

 

[RonnieT24]

Watch the video


He explains it perfectly and without bias towards Dak. He clearly says pre-snap showed him a single high look. Post snap you clearly see the deep safety drop back into a cover 2. The other safety is on the far hash playing 1/4 coverage.

Ceedee saw that deep safety drop back into that cover-2 zone and thats why he ran the post. The Safety that was playing quarters coverage is the one that picked the pass off. It wasnt cover 1 or 3 post snap bro

Come on man.. there is no safety on either hash. The free safety ends up outside the numbers over top of Gallup and the slot corner #26 drops deep on the numbers. #20 is the SS who initially retreats and only comes forward to go after the ball. If Lamb had stayed on the post he would have run himself right to the free safety ..




Nobody is playing "quarters" here. It was going to be 3 deep until the guy in the middle sees the ball and breaks on it.

 

[IceStar-D7]

You want the TRUTH??? Here ya go! Start at 20:20.....The Real Deal....

 

[WillieBeamen]

Come on man.. there is no safety on either hash. The free safety ends up outside the numbers over top of Gallup and the slot corner #26 drops deep on the numbers. #20 is the SS who initially retreats and only comes forward to go after the ball. If Lamb had stayed on the post he would have run himself right to the free safety ..




Nobody is playing "quarters" here. It was going to be 3 deep until the guy in the middle sees the ball and breaks on it.

That safety wasnt playing 3-deep. It was cover-6.
He is literally on the hashes until he anticipates Daks throw

That deep safety drops into the deep half with the corner sitting underneath

 

[Dre11]

It was single high pre-snap, post snap they switched to double high safety. Based on that rule Cee-Dee was right and turned up field behind the safety, Dak was wrong thinking CD would cross the face of the defender because he read single high pre-snap.

Greg Olsen was fooled too

Wrong... Dak made the right throw, as Isiah stated. Which is why he stated he had to go back on his word from last week .

 

[Dre11]

You have it wrong. It was single high pre-snap, double high post snap. In double high the receiver takes it up field, in single high he crosses the face.

Mccarthy after the film

 

[Brooksey]

Wrong... Dak made the right throw, as Isiah stated. Which is why he stated he had to go back on his word from last week .

That's not what he said. He said there was nothing to tell CD to cross the safety's face, CD saw two high, Dak was reading one high.

 

[Brooksey]

Mccarthy after the film

Greg Olsen too, but it's disguised. McCarthy and Olsen see single high safety...but is it?

 

[Dre11]

That's not what he said. He said there was nothing to tell CD to cross the safety's face, CD saw two high, Dak was reading one high.

Which is on ceedee because Dak made the right read.

 

[Dre11]

Greg Olsen too, but it's disguised. McCarthy and Olsen see single high safety...but is it?

How do your qb make the right read and you don't as a number 1. Ceedee was confused