NeonNinja
Dash28
- Messages
- 17,294
- Reaction score
- 15,038
CashMan;5055148 said:Cough...Ted Ginn...Cough
Complete bust IMO
Not even close to accurate IMO.
CashMan;5055148 said:Cough...Ted Ginn...Cough
Complete bust IMO
TheFinisher;5055510 said:[youtube]p1KfXUen5G4[/youtube]
DFWJC;5055312 said:He's not bigger, but is most likely tougher. Desean is much taller.
Desean Jackson was the 49th pick overall, btw.
Vinnie2u;5055554 said:The meltdown on this board Would be epic if Austin was picked in the first.
RS12;5055617 said:Actually I dont think so at 18. Moving up to get him is another story. Reality is he wont get past the Jets at 13, they are desperate for play makers.
ABQCOWBOY;5055545 said:Peter Warrick was a lot bigger. Are you maybe thinking Warrick Dunn? He was a lot closer in stature.
TheFinisher;5055659 said:Nope, I was thinking of Peter Warrick.
He was not much bigger than Tavon, coming out in his class he was considered undersized as well.
Fantastic open-field runner after the catch, was impossible to tackle 1-on-1 for DBs. I make the comparison because Tavon is the closest thing at WR to Warrick in the open field since... Warrick. He also moonlighted as a PR/KR like Tavon, and was considered the most exciting player in the country his last year in Tallahassee.
Most people don't remember how good Peter Warrick was at Florida State, but he was electrifying every time he touched the ball. Shame injuries caught up with him in the pros and he was stuck in the black hole known as Cincinnati.
Future;5055159 said:In terms of physical attributes, he's a lot like DeSean Jackson, but the way he will be used I think is more in line with Percy Harvin. Will be interesting to see if he is physical enough to be the same type of player as Harvin, especially if Minny drafts him.
And if he does, most think the Rams will take him soon after that.RS12;5055617 said:Actually I dont think so at 18. Moving up to get him is another story. Reality is he wont get past the Jets at 13, they are desperate for play makers.
joseephuss;5055668 said:Peter Warrick was good with the ball in his hands, but he wasn't really great at getting open. He didn't do well with all the little nuances a receiver needs to constantly get open in the NFL. You can hide that stuff in college and look great. Not so much in the NFL.
ABQCOWBOY;5055545 said:Peter Warrick was a lot bigger. Are you maybe thinking Warrick Dunn? He was a lot closer in stature.
Vinnie2u;5055554 said:The meltdown on this board Would be epic if Austin was picked in the first.
TheCount;5056094 said:No it wouldn't, there are plenty of people who want just that. The "Oline Only" crowd would be pretty upset though.