Alexander;2655327 said:Most developmental WRs brought into the league as undrafted free agents do, you know, take time to develop. But since he took that time and hasn't produced what you feel is appropriate catching the football, nobody will want him. He's a quality kick returner. But I suppose that doesn't give him enough value.
Looks like we wasted our time even bothering to tender him.
And "known" isn't the same as saying "proven". He is known to this team. He also has shown he can play in enough instances to make us want make the attempt to see if he can contribute. It is not the same as saying he's been consistent and proven.
You act like he's the next Randall Williams. He isn't.
Felix Jones is also a first round draft choice and a special player. Austin is an undrafted developmental WR who might be turning the corner and making something of himself. But, per you, he can't play. Nice to know.
superpunk;2655514 said:Take a look at the receivers found in round 2 the past few years.
Donnie Avery, Eddie Royal, Desean Jackson, Steve Smith (Giants), Greg Jennings, Vincent Jackson...
I mean, that's the type of players you're looking at in round 2. PLUS, they would be cheaper than what this new team would have to pay Austin.
No reason to think anyone is going to part with a second for Austin.
superpunk;2655514 said:Take a look at the receivers found in round 2 the past few years.
Donnie Avery, Eddie Royal, Desean Jackson, Steve Smith (Giants), Greg Jennings, Vincent Jackson...
I mean, that's the type of players you're looking at in round 2. PLUS, they would be cheaper than what this new team would have to pay Austin.
No reason to think anyone is going to part with a second for Austin.
superpunk;2655514 said:Take a look at the receivers found in round 2 the past few years.
Donnie Avery, Eddie Royal, Desean Jackson, Steve Smith (Giants), Greg Jennings, Vincent Jackson...
I mean, that's the type of players you're looking at in round 2. PLUS, they would be cheaper than what this new team would have to pay Austin.
No reason to think anyone is going to part with a second for Austin.
DFWJC;2655540 said:Well said. I hope Austin turns out to be great, but he is not even in the same league as some of those guys listed above.
nyc;2655562 said:Ok, you named a few. Now go name the receivers from those years that didn't pan out. See which side of the argument wins out.
Let me help you out. Add in first round talent WRs too. :laugh2:
Your logic is way out of whack on this one, IMHO.nyc;2655562 said:Ok, you named a few. Now go name the receivers from those years that didn't pan out. See which side of the argument wins out.
Let me help you out. Add in first round talent WRs too. :laugh2:
jterrell;2655622 said:Let me help you out and note any WR taken in the first 2 rounds that had 18 catches or less over three years would be labeled a horrendous bust and cut.
There have been a multitude of horrendous first round draft choices so why not just trade off a first for Austin???
You logic here = FAIL.
The value of the pick is much higher than Austin, period.
I stated we'd tag him as a second and have been correct thus far.
Now we can sit back and see if any team offers for him. No sense going to clown school arguing nonsense. It will be very clear who was correct shortly.
jterrell;2655100 said:Exactly.
Austin has flashed some potential but he hasn't shown any real tangible production. He is a solid but not special kick returner and he has great deep speed at WR. That's it.
He just doesn't have the production to merit paying a second.
I can not ever recall a WR with such little actual production over 3 years getting such applause from a fan base that seemingly hates everyone who actually produces.
I would love for all these guys thinking Austin gets an offer that forfeits a 2nd rounder to point to any WR that was traded for such a pick after 3 years of minimal production.