burmafrd;1408924 said:Actually, for the previous year (2005) Newman was better THAT year then Bailey was.
burmafrd;1409028 said:Champ did not have a good year in 2005. While Newman had his best year.
The Pro Bowl means NOTHING. Not to people who really look hard at the players. Anyone trying to use the probowl to prove ANYTHING is not someone to listen to. KC Joyner and several other sites that look hard at stats and such had Newman as the best CB in the NFL in 2005; and I think either Dr Z or Burger king talked about all the film he watched and then to his suprise came to the conclusion that Newman was the best that season. Bailey had an off year in 2005; and Newman had his best.
Charles;1409042 said:Somewhat similar to comparing Andre Gurode and Al Johnson as being similar players because Julius Jones stats didn't improve much up the middle in 2006
Charles;1408902 said:The rankings are bogus, but one things for sure Terence Newman ain't no Champ Bailey.
It was your contention that there was (direct quote)NO DISCERNABLE DIFFERENCE in Gurode and Al Johnson PLAY because Julius Jones (if you still think Julius was our primary/starting RB after the season then you have issues) stats were similar in 2005 and 2006.superpunk;1409063 said:Charles, just because you do not posess the comprehension to understand the relevancy and logic of that point, does not make it ridiculous, or a bad judgement point.
I say that, but I know that you actually DO understand why it is relevant, because you have cited Marion Barber's ypc improving up the middle as a reason for Gurode's play being superior in 2006. So, either you're a hypocrite, or you're just playing dumb - (or not "playing", whatever you prefer).
The fact remains, Gurode did not improve the numbers of our starting tailback running behind him at all, in fact he got worse. You may cite Julius' weakness being runs up the middle, but that does not address the fact that there was NO improvement. Julius could still suck at running up the middle, Gurode (if superior, as you claim) should just make him suck less.
You can keep it up, and display yourself for what you are (over and over again) or you can let it go. That's up to you.
demdcowboys#1;1407873 said:LOL at Shawn Springs.
So we're going with hypocrisy, then?Charles;1409095 said:It was your contention that there was (direct quote)NO DISCERNABLE DIFFERENCE in Gurode and Al Johnson because Julius Jones (if you still think Julius was our primary/starting RB after the season then you have issues) stats were similar in 2005 and 2006.
There is nothing you can say to justify the stupid point.......Al Johnson free agent itinerary pretty much justifies my point.
There is a discernable difference you just chose to ignore it to justify your opinion on Gurode.
burmafrd;1409028 said:Champ did not have a good year in 2005. While Newman had his best year.
The Pro Bowl means NOTHING.
Ismail capped off that valiant Cowboy comeback in 1999 amigo.riggo;1409129 said:very true. believe me, skins fans were watching that year.
as i recall, in single games he got burned for 2 TD's vs chad johnson, 3 vs jerry porter, and 2 vs eddie kennison. newman gave up zero TD's, i believe.
remember a year or 2 before when the skins had a lead vs dallas? ismail beat him deep late in the game to seal it.
i'll grant that what we see may not always be clear- as in, he may not have had the responsibility for that WR, but it sure as heck looked like it to me. to his credit, he's played better since (from what i've seen anyhow).
you couldn't have said it betterCharles;1408942 said:Hahaha. There are only 2 players in the NFL that have been unanimous AP All Pro selections in the past 2-3 seasons. LT and Champ Bailey.
The AP consists of local beat writers votes with significant input from GMs., coaches and players.
Players and coaches also contribute 2/3 of the votes for the Pro Bowl, they also have access to Newmans stats, but he's never been to Hawaii.
I like Newman. I'd only take 2 or 3 CBs in the NFL over Newman, but in reality Newman has never consistently played at an elite level. Folks around these parts like to highlight his positives, but totally ignore the negatives. For a player drafted 5th overall he lacks the game changing potential that every GM and organization looks for when selecting high in the draft.
Terence Newman has never played on a Champ Bailey level, but the rankings are still bogus. I have Newman in the 5-10 range.
Deion was the only 'elite" that got credit for a games like that because he marketed himself as a character and namebrand and flashy alter-ego with endorsements and endzone dances.InmanRoshi;1409164 said:The trouble is, most people don't do the foggiest bit of homework, so they really have no idea how many INT's the average elite CB makes in a typical season. They think the average shutdown CB gets 6-8 INT's in a season, which is completely ridiculous.
Newman is a legitimate Top 5 CB, but the best thing about Newman is he's really not a liability in any area, and he doesn't need complimentary players for him to do his job ... unlike another "elite" player in our secondary.
I guess true if you say sosuperpunk;1409122 said:So we're going with hypocrisy, then?
Poor choice, but at least it's a choice.
Welcome to the dark side. I knew I was right. I didn't need you, the $10 SB Gurode got or the lack of interest (Arizona = NFL purgatory) in Al Johnson in free agency to know it.:superpunk;1409122 said:You're right, I said that - once. It was a mistake -
I don't seem to remember questioning any other point other than the "No discernable difference" based on Julius Jones stats up the middle.....superpunk;1409122 said:every other place where I issued a comparison I have quantified it with the running stats.
:laugh1: That is exactly what you did. You chose "only" Julius Jones stats up the middle to make a point about Gurode and Al being similar ........now you're calling me hypocrite..... after I was the one who interjected Marion Barbers dominance and the improved pass protection when Gurode started.superpunk;1409122 said:You're a hypocrite, and an absolute petty fool, because you laugh off and discount one RBs production (the one who had the majority of the carries) while thumping the other's.
Not that anything else was expected.
Charles;1409179 said:That is exactly what you did. You chose "only" Julius Jones stats up the middle to make a point about Gurode and Al being similar ........now you're calling me hypocrite..... after I was the one who interjected Marion Barbers dominance and the improved pass protection when Gurode started.
Dude I give up. Do want to talk about Tony Curtis? He's Euro bound
chuckles said:Barber averaged 5.2 yards per carry up the middle. 40% of his total yards came from rushing up the middle. I think most would agree that Barbers strenghts was hitting the hole hard, mixing it up, breaking tackles and bouncing to the outside as opposed to finding creases like Clinton Portis.
......
Julius Jones strenght has never been running up the middle, yet you feel compelled to use Julius Jones weakeness to knock Gurode's Pro Bowl season