Charles
Benched
- Messages
- 3,408
- Reaction score
- 1
Totally agree. Stats never tell the whole story. If it did Green would have rarely made the Pro Bowl and ALL PRO selection and Newman would be a perennial selection.InmanRoshi;1409164 said:The trouble is, most people don't do the foggiest bit of homework, so they really have no idea how many INT's the average elite CB makes in a typical season. They think the average shutdown CB gets 6-8 INT's in a season, which is completely ridiculous. Darrell Green didn't average 3 picks a season, yet I don't see how anyone with a semblance of football knowledge would say he wasn't an elite CB, and probably one of the 5 best to ever play his position despite the lack of "big plays". Another problem is most of the big name publications just sprinkle the magic "Pro Bowl" dust on a player on non-stat driven positions, like CB and OL, and it sticks until they retire.
I gotta disagree. Newman is a liability in run support. He's weak at the point of attack.InmanRoshi;1409164 said:Newman is a legitimate Top 5 CB, but the best thing about Newman is he's really not a liability in any area, and he doesn't need complimentary players for him to do his job ... unlike another "elite" player in our secondary.
The standard for run support amongst CB are Winfield, Law, Mcalister. I can't forget Cooley taking Newman's jock to the End Zone in 2005 after a open field miss tackle.
Parcell even question his technique last season in pass coverage.