Terrence Williams is garbage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Spectre

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
522
is garbage.
Didn't like the draft pick; Haven't seen anything impressive in this player. He seems awkward and below-average in basically every regard. What am I missing?
 

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,717
Reaction score
5,282
Well, not saying you're wrong, but he's a rookie. How many rookie WR's come in and dominate in their first NFL game?
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
is garbage.
Didn't like the draft pick; Haven't seen anything impressive in this player. He seems awkward and below-average in basically every regard. What am I missing?

Quite a lot, actually.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
is garbage.
Didn't like the draft pick; Haven't seen anything impressive in this player. He seems awkward and below-average in basically every regard. What am I missing?

Outside of the fact you made your mind up when he was selected he is a rookie. I think he is a quality player and will continue to develop at this level.
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,699
Reaction score
12,658
I see the potential. But I really wished they hadn't have tried to force this so hard last night. It could have cost us more than what it did.

Harris is the better option. Big play potential be damned-- Williams has not earned half of what Harris has.
 

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,203
Reaction score
10,677
dominating is far from my question. I don't see potential, even.

My issue is that Harris has earned more of a role, but I think Williams and Escobar are out there soley based on draft investment - not merit. They may be the 2 All-Pro HOFers in 3 years, but they should not be taking multiple snaps away from others right now
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Not true. A few come in and do well, but the majority of rookie wide receivers go through growing pains.

You might reread my comment and look at the bolded and underlined area in my quote to get that I was disagreeing with the OP.
 

mldardy

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,614
Reaction score
7,311
is garbage.
Didn't like the draft pick; Haven't seen anything impressive in this player. He seems awkward and below-average in basically every regard. What am I missing?

I wish there was a 'don't like' option for this. He's a rookie!!
 

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,699
Reaction score
12,658
To add to the issue of 'forcing Williams into the lineup', Romo was targetting him with their best cover man, Prince Amukamura in tow. Not Williams fault, but that's just a horrible decision.

If Williams was drawing their best cover guy, Romo should have been looking elsewhere for easy completions.
 

Spectre

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
522
I also don't really see how expressing concern over a guy who's showed nothing, is a complete rook, and almost cost us a 90 yard/6 point turnover in a close game- getting so much immediate P.T.- is 'overreacting'.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
My issue is that Harris has earned more of a role, but I think Williams and Escobar are out there soley based on draft investment - not merit. They may be the 2 All-Pro HOFers in 3 years, but they should not be taking multiple snaps away from others right now

Harris works out of the slot not as an Outside WR and I would rather have Miles in the slot. Williams is out there because they feel he can do the job and Harris too will see playing time.
 

boysfanindc

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,227
Reaction score
2,863
I also don't really see how expressing concern over a guy who's showed nothing, is a complete rook, and almost cost us a 90 yard/6 point turnover in a close game is getting so much immediate P.T. is 'overreacting'.

That is not the same as saying this kid has NO potential, think that is what people are reacting too.

He has played one game and we now know he has no potential.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top