jterrell
Penguinite
- Messages
- 33,902
- Reaction score
- 15,994
That's how I see it as well.
I've also thought that they could go after Briles. I know Galloway said last year that Arkansas (and maybe even Tennessee also?) was interested and Briles didn't want to go, that the only two jobs he'd leave Baylor for would be Tech and UT. He's as good an offensive coach as there is, as good a QB developer as there is, and he knows and can recruit the area. I'd think the fans would love all the high scoring.
I also agree with what koolaid said. Why they can't just recruit the biggest and best guys on both sides of the line and play bully ball? (And I've said the same thing about OU.) Speaking of that, doubt he'd leave after just one year, but I bet Bielema would be a great coach for a powerhouse recruiting school like that.
Stylistically UT can do anything it wants. ANYTHING. It just needs to decide than consistently recruit those players.
Pro style is fine and they can recruit Pro Style. Speed defense is fine but recruit that and stop recruiting 300 pound athletes in an attempt to play speed ball.
Stop recruiting based off Sophomore year Longhorns Camp performances.
Stop changing tactics every 24 months. Especially since you recruit 24 months early.
I'd run the pistol on offense with an emphasis on a dual threat QB and a running game.
I'd get big nasty OL who love to maul people not just the guys who win an OL beauty contest by being 6'5" and 310 with fairly little bodyfat.
On defense I'd play pressure defense and focus on hitting people. College teams score a gazillion points.
At least pop them int he mouth for it in the process.
But there is no doubt they can win at UT with Saban or Briles or Bielema or any number of coaches with an actual clue as to what they want to do and how to recruit for their systems.
UT won a title with VY then decided they wanted Lienart type pocket passers... makes zero sense.