Zekeats
theranchsucks
- Messages
- 13,141
- Reaction score
- 15,692
Thanks for proving me right.It's not lazy. It is correct. Jimmy shares the blame.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/arts-entertainment/ego-clash-that-doomed-dallas-cowboys/
Thanks for proving me right.It's not lazy. It is correct. Jimmy shares the blame.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/arts-entertainment/ego-clash-that-doomed-dallas-cowboys/
Here's another.No that’s lazy. Jimmy gave and demoted his life to that team. He molded it, he influenced it, he created it. He made them winners. He was the psychologist who made it all happen. For the owner to disrespect him the way he did, getting drunk and saying he could get anyone to coach that team was the ultimate disrespect. It’s not like Jimmy got drunk and came out and **** talked Jerry. It was 100% Jerry’s fault.
If you think that proves you right, then there's nothing I can do to correct your vision. There are plenty of articles out there that show both were to blame.Thanks for proving me right.
It's very obvious who was the main reason and at fault. It's even more obvious since he won't put him in the ring of honor still even 2 years after saying he would on national television.If you think that proves you right, then there's nothing I can do to correct your vision. There are plenty of articles out there that show both were to blame.
Would have been a four-peat at least since the Cowboys still won in spite of Switzer the following year. Amazing team.I think that team was better than the 95 team that did win the SB. With Jimmy there I think we had a good shot to three-peat.
They were both at fault, even if Jerry was the main reason (which I never said he wasn't, just that they both let egos get in the way and both deserve blame). It's hard to say that Jimmy wouldn't have left without the blowup. Jimmy didn't like to stay anywhere very long, and had openly expressed his interest in Jacksonville as I pointed out. He liked the challenge of building a champion more than he enjoyed maintaining a champion. That was how he was wired. He also has said that if I remember correctly.It's very obvious who was the main reason and at fault. It's even more obvious since he won't put him in the ring of honor still even 2 years after saying he would on national television.
I read that article last November. And I am referring to both men psychologically.I think they were pretty close to the same back then. Read this if you don't think so:
https://www.texasmonthly.com/arts-entertainment/ego-clash-that-doomed-dallas-cowboys/
Not sure what you mean by that. Both men's egos got in the way of what could have been.I read that article last November. And I am referring to both men psychologically.
4 peatI think that team was better than the 95 team that did win the SB. With Jimmy there I think we had a good shot to three-peat.
actually it was 2 men, jimmy had a huge ego too, and he quit and would not come back.One man’s ego destroyed a dynasty smh
yeah I just watched that game, andWe woulda set a SB record. 94 with Jimmy we don't spot the niners 21 and we win.
I disagree. With the turmoil caused by Jimmy-Jerry, and having a horrible start, the Cowboys were taking over that game against SF until Deion got away with P.I. My buddy who was a Raiders fan was watching and he thought Dallas was going to win until the no call.I don't think there is any question that the '94 team was better. I think the Cowboys got lucky that the Packers beat the 49ers in the playoffs, or else I don't believe we beat the 49ers. I remember being so happy that the Packers won that game.
No one is saying they would have won every year Jimmy was here. But it would have easily been at least a 4peat....something that seems impossible even now. Historical.The 94 team made it to the NFC title game against a stacked 49ers team and turned the ball over three times. It’s not like the team never turned the ball over with Jimmy as head coach. The turnovers did them in. Let’s be honest had Jerry Rice’s TD not been called back early in the first quarter of the 92 NFC title game the Cowboys might have lost that one. We caught some breaks in that game and we didn’t catch any in the 94 game. If you listen to some fans here, they seem to think the Cowboys would have continued winning Super Bowls year after year had Jimmy stayed. That wasn’t going to happen. The salary cap and free agency eventually caught up with our great 90s teams.
LOL my poor writing skills shows up again. I'll rephrase it. I thought the '94 Cowboys was better than the '95 team. I had no confidence that the '95 Cowboys could beat the 49ers in the playoffs. In my previous post, I failed to transition properly from '94 to '95.I disagree. With the turmoil caused by Jimmy-Jerry, and having a horrible start, the Cowboys were taking over that game against SF until Deion got away with P.I. My buddy who was a Raiders fan was watching and he thought Dallas was going to win until the no call.
There is no way that SF was better than Dallas if the drama between Jerry & Jimmy wasn't a distraction. If things were still going as they were in 92 and 93 I think Dallas goes 14-2 or better and trashes SF in the title game.
Of course 100%. That team would have won 4 in a row but the gods just never allowed it.Jimmy coaching that team I'm not so sure we lose 2 games and am pretty sure we land home field and the championship game woulda been different. In 94 we still had Harper and drafted Larry Allen and all the other core and role players. What a great team but sadly they just couldn't get over the HC and the Niners were stacked but again I think we win with Jimmy.
Biggest clusterf__ ever. Kill the goose that laid the golden egg why don't you !Worst thing I've ever seen happen to the Cowboys.And I've been a fan since 1965.
Very fair.It also helped build the same dynasty...with the good you get the bad...but I highly doubt anyone would give up those 3 superbowls in those 4 years...unfortunately he just made so many mistakes after that we have wasted nearly 30 years