The Cowboys Have Plenty to Think About This Offseason but Not Their QB | The Ringer

America's Cowboy said:
"Let's be civil. No need to throw insults."

Lying hypocrite!
Click to expand...
Oh...I wasn't aware that you agree to it. I thought you called it off. My bad.

I'm sorry for being so offensive. I didn't realize that was an insult. I think I had more like...name-calling in mind.

I will be more mindful of the sensitive nature of it.
 
USArmyVet said:
Lights out?????? Dak led Dallas to only 13 points late into the 3rd quarter which helped in providing GB with a 28-13 lead so let's not pretend Dak was 'lights out'.
Click to expand...
Down 18 points halfway through the 2nd quarter as a rookie against the great Aaron Rodgers in his prime, yet able to bring the team back to tie the game 31 all with 35 seconds left? Pfft, not even Romo could do that. Show some respect.
 
America's Cowboy said:
Down 18 points halfway through the 2nd quarter as a rookie against the great Aaron Rodgers in his prime, yet able to bring the team back to tie the game 31 all with 35 seconds left? Pfft, not even Romo could do that. Show some respect.
Click to expand...
Respect? Dak did in his rookie season what he has done throughout his career: be the invisible man for a large part of a game then rack up stats in a losing effort.

Applaud him all you want but you have to look closer at the end of game stats Dak puts up.
 
The probability of trading Dak is low. Tampa or another good team that loses a QB in camp would seem to be the options. Aside from that he is the guy for 2 years. So buckle up Dakaholics. Jerry thanks you for looking the other way.
 
Whyjerry said:
The probability of trading Dak is low. Tampa or another good team that loses a QB in camp would seem to be the options. Aside from that he is the guy for 2 years. So buckle up Dakaholics. Jerry thanks you for looking the other way.
Click to expand...
Dak is the equivalent of owning a car that may appear to be free of dents and rust but has numerous mechanical issues and you desire a newer vehicle but simply can't afford one......and every morning you have to live with that every time the car goes out on to the road......all the while wondering if this is the day it breaks down completely.
 
USArmyVet said:
Dak is the equivalent of owning a car that may appear to be free of dents and rust but has numerous mechanical issues and you desire a newer vehicle but simply can't afford one......and every morning you have to live with that every time the car goes out on to the road......all the while wondering if this is the day it breaks down completely.
Click to expand...
I bet you were proud of this post.
 
USArmyVet said:
Dak is the equivalent of owning a car that may appear to be free of dents and rust but has numerous mechanical issues and you desire a newer vehicle but simply can't afford one......and every morning you have to live with that every time the car goes out on to the road......all the while wondering if this is the day it breaks down completely.
Click to expand...
If you compare Dak's 7 years to any other thing there's not a single person that would trust it.

If your car failed every year while going on vacation would you drive it?

If that plane failed every year on it's oceanic flight would you buckle up and go?

If that roller coaster failed every year right at the loop would you ride it?

No, you wouldn't, so how does one develop such unconditional trust in something that has failed over and over again? It truly should be studied.
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
If you compare Dak's 7 years to any other thing there's not a single person that would trust it.

If your car failed every year while going on vacation would you drive it?

If that plane failed every year on it's oceanic flight would you buckle up and go?

If that roller coaster failed every year right at the loop would you ride it?

No, you wouldn't, so how does one develop such unconditional trust in something that has failed over and over again? It truly should be studied.
Click to expand...
From someone that jumped from planes in the military world and still does in the civilian world, never trust equipment until it is inspected over and over again personally.

Having personally seen Dak play over the last 7 seasons, I agree that the trust simply isn't there.
 
USArmyVet said:
From someone that jumped from planes in the military world and still does in the civilian world, never trust equipment until it is inspected over and over again personally.

Having personally seen Dak play over the last 7 seasons, I agree that the trust simply isn't there.
Click to expand...
The unconditional faith and trust in Dak by fans of this team is what I have the most trouble wrapping my head around.
 
USArmyVet said:
Respect? Dak did in his rookie season what he has done throughout his career: be the invisible man for a large part of a game then rack up stats in a losing effort.

Applaud him all you want but you have to look closer at the end of game stats Dak puts up.
Click to expand...
Bunch of hogwash. Here you the go. Rewatch it.



Those crooked officials were in the Packers pocket book. Helping the Packers out all game long. Yet, Dak was able to bring the team back to tie with 35 seconds left. Our Defense was horrible, as were the officials.
 
This guy would have thrown over 20 interceptions if he started every game.

please he's not repairable

good Lord Dak is his number one problem

Honestly I'm getting the feeling that Jerry is going draft a quarterback or 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 72 more.
Total: 4,894 (members: 172, guests: 4,722)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,206
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top