Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 58,152
- Reaction score
- 38,759
I hear ya but that’s a high bar for our dysfunctionally ran franchise this era.NFC championship game now and then would be good.
To be clear.....not all on dak...ofcourse.
I hear ya but that’s a high bar for our dysfunctionally ran franchise this era.NFC championship game now and then would be good.
To be clear.....not all on dak...ofcourse.
How about 3 division titles .You're flat out lying for Dak by crediting him for back to back 12 win seasons when he was in street clothes for 6 games.
If he's not a loser then what's he won? What's in his trophy case? Educate me.
Your idea of winning and my idea of winning don't mesh and that explains our philosophy on players and coaches.How about 3 division titles .
Losers don’t have winning records , win divisions and make the playoffs.
He’s a moderately successful QB.
Please employ critical thinking about the strength of the NFC Least before the Eagle turned it aroundHow about 3 division titles .
Losers don’t have winning records , win divisions and make the playoffs.
He’s a moderately successful QB.
He's a leftover from the Landry era, when losing in the playoffs was evidence of greatness.Your idea of winning and my idea of winning don't mesh and that explains our philosophy on players and coaches.
Moderate fans like moderately successful QBs I suppose.
I only responded because you called him a Loser.Your idea of winning and my idea of winning don't mesh and that explains our philosophy on players and coaches.
Moderate fans like moderately successful QBs I suppose.
No doubt but that was only 6 of our 16 games but if he was a big loser we couldnt have even beat them.Please employ critical thinking about the strength of the NFC Least before the Eagle turned it around
it was a dumpster fire for several seasons and the division wasn’t hard to win
ergo….early exit from the playoffs
It's possible all dak has to do his hit those couple easy passes...and all that goes away.I hear ya but that’s a high bar for our dysfunctionally ran franchise this era.
I’d begin blaming the one who placed a less than Elite QB in a role we expect him to carry us.It's possible all dak has to do his hit those couple easy passes...and all that goes away.
Like I said...not all dak. Turpin makes a good move and that's a TD. Tony doesn't get hurt and does something. Schultz runs a better route. Zeke put some effort into it sheesh! O-line could you please pancake someone?
But....Dak is the high paid de facto LEADER. He's the one paid to win and lead. If you like Dak...then you have to give the dysfunctional franchise credit for having him and giving him all that money.
To win...regardless of low paid scrub leftovers.
Like I said...please don't think I blame just Dak. It's never just one thing. But...we have to have some discernment and judgment here. Dak HAS to take some (alot) of that blame because of those headscratching miscues...by the superstar leader QB.
He's talking about a record when it matters the most. Like the last two san fran games. Not to blame only dak but in no small part either.I only responded because you called him a Loser.
A loser to me would be someone at least with a losing record.
This is a a mediocre football franchise this era under Jethro so moderate success is reasonably acceptable .
What does "less than elite" mean?I’d begin blaming the one who placed a less than Elite QB in a role we expect him to carry us.
He’s just hyping and promoting his product. Amazing all fans still don’t grasp his priorities.He's talking about a record when it matters the most. Like the last two san fran games. Not to blame only dak but in no small part either.
Not Elite. Average to above average .What does "less than elite" mean?
You were good with "average"...then ruined it with "to above average".No doubt but that was only 6 of our 16 games but if he was a big loser we couldnt have even beat them.
And that’s all I’m taking on. The definition of Loser.
To me a loser is like Gary Hogeboom and Steve Pueller. Maybe Quincy Carter.
Not a QB with a career winning record, division titles , top 10 offenses and better than average passing stats.
I’d define it as moderate success . Average to above average . About what our franchise has been this era.
Sounds like the Eagles constructed a good squad AROUND Jalen.Bad games for the top quarterbacks, 2023 season (via TruMedia)
Quarterback Games played Games w/ negative EPA Record Patrick Mahomes 17 0 (LOL) N/A Josh Allen 17 2 1-1 Joe Burrow 17 5 2-3 Justin Herbert 17 8 3-5 Jalen Hurts 15 5 4-1 Aaron Rodgers 17 9 2-7 Dak Prescott 12 4 1-3
Once again...why do you have to go with the "above average". "above average: qb's do have head scratchers...for example Mahommes snap fumble, was pretty funny. But that doesn't define him. His highs are VERY high and lows are not very low. Even Cooper Rush...his highs aren't all that high...and his lows aren't all that low.Not Elite. Average to above average .
Like most of the NFL QB’s franchises are left to build around .
He doesn’t generally fare as well against the top defenses . Like most average to above average QB’s.You were good with "average"...then ruined it with "to above average".
In stats...mostly helped by our poor division...and...the SUCK of the NFC South this year...you might say that. But when we really need to play well (or just get lucky maybe) and convincingly WIN...we kinda suck.