That really isn't an apples to apples comparison. If you extrapolate the .531 without over 144 games, we would have won only 5 less without TS than with him. That comes out to 1 additional win every other season over a 9 year span. That truly is insignificant. There are a lot of variables that go into wins and losses but if you're trying to say TS was a big difference maker on the won/loss columns, the stats don't bear it out.
That is not to say that TS is not a HOFer.
Stats aren’t flawed. It’s how they’re interpreted and how they’re used is where the flaws startyes and like all stats, is flawed. It depends greatly on what defense they play each game with and who is the LT battling ?
Also is offense run heavy, pass heavy or balanced>? those things make a difference.
they are flawed in the way they are accumulated and totaled.Stats aren’t flawed. It’s how they’re interpreted and how they’re used is where the flaws start