ejwilson1984
Active Member
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 86
Dak played well. He made a bunch of good throws. I recall 2 bad throws. One in the end zone and the pick. We’re better with Dak than with out him.
When he can put up a performance like this against a good team , then by all means he would deserve the praise.
trollIt is what it is. I enjoy baiting the Dak Hacks.
They always come running to defend their Dak suks agenda.
What an entertaining existence to bash our QB
And he may not perform as well against the big boys. Most don’t except for the more elite.Obviously over Rush, and yes he looks good just like the first half of last year - the problem comes when we play the big boys...
And thats not exclusive to just Dak, hence why I call them the "Not Ready for Prime Time Players".
It is what it is. If you’re entire entertainment here is bashing your favorite teams QB then we can entertain ourselves taking aim at this group as well .What an entertaining existence to bait people on social media for one's own life compensation.
Dak played well. He made a bunch of good throws. I recall 2 bad throws. One in the end zone and the pick. We’re better with Dak than with out him.
He’s waiting to quote Stephen A the Cowboys biggest troll. Or the Herd.. whoever is bashing Dak. LolOh, he's not the only one..... they are probably punching holes in the wall WHILE wearing a Cowboys jersey right now.
Definite agree, thats why I dont get into Dak threads much.And he may not perform as well against the big boys. Most don’t except for the more elite.
Ok. So we’re not one of the better teams and we don’t have one of the better QB’s.
At some point we have to accept what we are and move on. Shame we can’t enjoy the wins we have.
I hear ya. It is what it is. Jumbo is right and he represents most Cowboy fans who are more in the middle on Prescott .Definite agree, thats why I dont get into Dak threads much.
Enjoying the win, at the same time just wish someday we will not have to accept that we aren't good enough.
It is amazing how some cannot make a distinction between saying (as you did) that “The Cowboys are a better team with Dak,” and saying “Dak is the most bestest goodest QB in the history of the football, and is destined to win 100 billion zillion Super Bowls if not for the evil impact of the dastardly Jerry and Stephen Jones - the absolute worstest, terrible no-good owners/general managers of any sport ever in the history of the whole wide world.”
This is where we say it's the Bears.
You know I've always enjoyed your stuff, but not sure how much Dak being back was part of what we saw today. Coming in, Chicago was the worst against the run. Someone said they were ranked high against the pass but only 2 other teams had seen less pass attempts against.
Not saying he played poorly, but attributing Pollard's big day to some kind of, "Dak effect," just seems more like poking his detractors than reflecting what we watched. Good to see you around more though.
The discussion of whether or not this quarterback i good enough is on going and wasn’t settled in week 1 and isn’t settled after a barn burner against nobodies.There’s already two of them in this thread. They can’t help themselves. It’s their entire existence hovering over Dak threads. They generally have nothing else to offer in a Cowboys forum.
I can understand the defense scoring and not giving offense credit.....so does a defensive TD and Pollard going for 131 rushing yards and 3 rushing TD's.
Maybe, just maybe a healthy Dak Prescott does make a difference for this team. Going out on a limb…
Update/Clarification: Of course Dak doesn’t get ALL the credit. But the EFFECT of a healthy Dak is a better team performance, just like the EFFECT of Micah Parsons is better performances of the defensive players around him. (Seriously, some people need lessons in reading comprehension.)