Jack Burton
It's all in the reflexes.
- Messages
- 3,266
- Reaction score
- 3,607
Hopefully Dunbar or Randle can have a double dookie stick kind of game if Murray can't go.
Since Emmitt left Jerry has made some big miscalculations when it comes to RB's. I mentioned Hambrick who Jerry was sold on a starter watching him stumble through gaping holes in relief of Emmitt. He was foolish enough to think Barber was a feature back who could do as an every down starter what he did as a fresh legged role player in relief. He gave him a lot of money then used a #1 draft pick on Felix Jones to compliment him.
Barber quickly faded once his carries increased and Felix was another back who looked terrific in relief. When the Cowboys moved on from Barber and Felix got the opportunity to start and his carries increased he looked nowhere near like he did in relief and his rushing average went way down. Jerry made a comment several weeks ago saying the Cowboys would be fine with Randle because like all the other backups the Cowboys have had he's looked good in relief.
I don't see why this would pose a problem. Randle and Dunbar aren't considered top-tier backs like Murray. That's like comparing Sherwin Williams and Derrick Lassic to Emmitt Smith behind the Great Wall of Dallas.
With this OL some don't think we need a top tier back to continue running the ball the way we are.
With this OL some don't think we need a top tier back to continue running the ball the way we are.
Imagine for a moment that Randle and Dunbar burst onto the scene in Murray's absence, The talk of our offensive line being the catalyst that sprung Murray will go into over drive. It could go a long way in either parting ways with him or driving his price down.
However, if they fail to produce, then many who have sold Murray short will likely jump on the opposing bandwagon and reconsider cutting ties with him. If this were the outcome, I'd certainly hate to be either Randle or Dunbar. There would be no talk of a future with them, as it would be all about Murray or bringing in an outsider.
You always go for a top-tier back. I don't think Dunbar and Randle are top-tier backs. In fact, I've noticed on a few occasions, the line will open holes, but they don't seem to have the leg drive to get that extra yard for the first down.
If money is not an issue, you never settle for a second-tier player at ANY position if a first-tier player is available.
People will say that but Martin could miss the game or will definitely be limited.Imagine for a moment that Randle and Dunbar burst onto the scene in Murray's absence, The talk of our offensive line being the catalyst that sprung Murray will go into over drive. It could go a long way in either parting ways with him or driving his price down.
However, if they fail to produce, then many who have sold Murray short will likely jump on the opposing bandwagon and reconsider cutting ties with him. If this were the outcome, I'd certainly hate to be either Randle or Dunbar. There would be no talk of a future with them, as it would be all about Murray or bringing in an outsider.
True, one thing gets left out he leads in YAC. OL does a very good job but Murray tough running allows him to pick up more yards
The problem is a lot of fans don't see that. It's like with Emmitt most gave the OL the credit and still do to this day due to the Cowboys having what most consider the greatest OL in NFL history. That OL was so great it's been named the Great Wall of Dallas and was documented in NFLN's A Football Life. Not even Emmitt's career has been documented on it's A Football Life yet but several other backs have including Terrell Davis who'll never have a bust in Canton. Emmitt came out of some piles and made plays on his owe at times but he's been disrespected some due to the Cowboys great OL. The same with Murray the OL is receiving most of the credit and it's clearly been part of the reason but as I've said several times he had some big games before this OL was built.
I agree which is why I think Emmitt is one of the best All Around RB to play the game. Rushing, blocking and receiving, Barry Sanders may have been the best pure runner I have seen but when it came to the all around game I take Emmitt any day of the week. While OL does deserve credit and Emmitt would be the 1st to do so, no other RB who played behind Emmitt never did much and when Emmitt missed games due to injury or holdout we did not win many games.
As most remember the Cowboys started off the 93 season 0-2 while Emmitt was holding out. Derrick Lassic got 3 starts that season behind The Great Wall of Dallas and averaged only 3.6 yards a carry. In 3 starts he never rushed for more than 75 yards. In Emmitt's 4th start that season he rushed for a then franchise record 237 yards vs Philly on a rain soaked seamed up turf at the Vet.
Pretty snarky remark for something that passes as fairly obvious to even the most casual observer.This OL is the real story here in Dallas. The sooner some of you get that through your heads, the sooner you will stop worrying about Murray
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see that scenario play out. And I think you're right in that he wants to stay in Dallas and that Dallas would love to keep him. I just don't think Murray would go for that type of contract and that Jerry won't be willing to pay him what he'll get from somebody else out there. If it goes down that way, I wouldn't blame Murray for taking his payday. I could be wrong, however...wouldn't be the first time.
Murray's an excellent back; I don't think anyone is arguing against that, and if they are, they're silly. I will note this, though:As most remember the Cowboys started off the 93 season 0-2 while Emmitt was holding out. Derrick Lassic got 3 starts that season behind The Great Wall of Dallas and averaged only 3.6 yards a carry. In 3 starts he never rushed for more than 75 yards. In Emmitt's 4th start that season he rushed for a then franchise record 237 yards vs Philly on a rain soaked seamed up turf at the Vet.
Pretty snarky remark for something that passes as fairly obvious to even the most casual observer.
Imagine for a moment that Randle and Dunbar burst onto the scene in Murray's absence, The talk of our offensive line being the catalyst that sprung Murray will go into over drive. It could go a long way in either parting ways with him or driving his price down.
However, if they fail to produce, then many who have sold Murray short will likely jump on the opposing bandwagon and reconsider cutting ties with him. If this were the outcome, I'd certainly hate to be either Randle or Dunbar. There would be no talk of a future with them, as it would be all about Murray or bringing in an outsider.
Imagine for a moment that Randle and Dunbar burst onto the scene in Murray's absence, The talk of our offensive line being the catalyst that sprung Murray will go into over drive. It could go a long way in either parting ways with him or driving his price down.
However, if they fail to produce, then many who have sold Murray short will likely jump on the opposing bandwagon and reconsider cutting ties with him. If this were the outcome, I'd certainly hate to be either Randle or Dunbar. There would be no talk of a future with them, as it would be all about Murray or bringing in an outsider.