The Future is Dan Quinn

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
And what I’m saying is that Jerry Jones sticking with a ‘never-was’ of a head coach fur far longer than the guy’s talent or production ever deserved doesn’t make him an acceptable coach.

Jerry Jones’ stubbornness doesn’t mean Garrett was good at the job gifted to him.



And there are also three Super Bowl tithes in there as well.

Conversely, Garrett couldn’t even keep a coordinator job for two years.

Without Jerry propping him up, the guy can’t get work.
Who said he was an acceptable or good HC?

I’m just saying he was one of our most successful HC’s in this down era. His record supports as such if you’re including division titles and playoff wins.
 

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,048
Reaction score
14,773
Anyone that's a fan of the 25th ranked offensive coordinator Kellen Moore obviously isn't aware of his poor play calling whose been exposed several times last season because of it.

Any HC that went through a pandemic which cause havoc in the sports world with no practices/scrimmages, limited players & still pulled off 6 wins in his first season, made a statement. The 2nd season MM doubled the wins. And calling another human being names, "McFatty", tells me exactly what type/kind of individual you are. It goes without saying that you'll have health issues as well when getting older. No one escapes it!


https://www.lineups.com/nfl-team-rankings

where are ya'll getting this " 25th ranked " stats from ? ... Sarcasm post ?

:huh:
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
So you admit that he wasn’t?
That’s not my argument . I’ve tried to avoid using opinions on his coaching ability focusing only on the results in comparison to other Cowboy HC’s this era.

The fact remains he had as much or more success than more proven and experienced HC’s this era regardless his coaching abilities or lack thereof .

The fact his tenure was longer is all on our owner . But again as I laid out in an earlier post in comparison even with his longer tenure he still out performed cumulatively the other HC’s in similar time frame .

He wasted no more time this era than Gailey , Campo, Parcells and Philips combined . And produced as good or better results than them combined in division titles and playoff wins . Truly amazing considering his experience and qualifications coming in.
 
Last edited:

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,913
Reaction score
103,784
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That’s not my argument . I’ve tried to avoid using opinions on his coaching ability focusing only on the results in comparison to other Cowboy HC’s this era.

So you concede that he wasn’t an acceptable or good head coach? Or is this another question you will run and hide from?

The fact remains he had as much or more success than more proven and experienced HC’s this era regardless his coaching abilities or lack thereof .

I’ll ask again, who?


Do you answer questions or just make unsubstantiated claims?

The fact his tenure was longer is all on our owner . But again as I laid out in an earlier post in comparison even with his longer tenure he still out performed cumulatively the other HC’s in similar time frame .

Whike desperately trying to ignore the different conditions and circumstances. Completely disingenuous.

He wasted no more time this era than Gailey , Campo, Parcells and Philips combined .

Another patently false statement. Stop lying.

And produced as good or better results than them combined in division titles and playoff wins . Truly amazing considering his experience and qualifications coming in.

No it isn’t. No matter how hard you try or how many times you say it.

Garrett was a disappointing failure. For over a decade.
You can practice as much willful ignorance as you’d like. Seek help.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
So you concede that he wasn’t an acceptable or good head coach? Or is this another question you will run and hide from?



I’ll ask again, who?


Do you answer questions or just make unsubstantiated claims?



Whike desperately trying to ignore the different conditions and circumstances. Completely disingenuous.



Another patently false statement. Stop lying.



No it isn’t. No matter how hard you try or how many times you say it.

Garrett was a disappointing failure. For over a decade.
You can practice as much willful ignorance as you’d like. Seek help.
You obviously are avoiding and denying the facts of the results . All of the comparisons of records with our other coaches provided this era are accurate . You simply don’t like what they reveal.

This is where you become frustrated and begin name calling or insulting me personally.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,913
Reaction score
103,784
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
You obviously are avoiding and denying the facts of the results .


Don’t dare attempt to project your own willful ignorance and avoidance on me or anyone rise. That’s all you.

All of the comparisons of records with our other coaches provided this era are accurate . You simply don’t like what they reveal.

Au contraire. I see them for what they are. Weak excuses and attempts at obfuscation. You throw it out there like it has merit but flee in terror when challenged to support it or discuss the circumstances.

This is where you become frustrated and begin name calling or insulting me personally.

Where did I call you a name? Is this you playing your victim card too early?
 
Last edited:

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,910
Reaction score
37,919
Who said he was an acceptable or good HC?

I’m just saying he was one of our most successful HC’s in this down era. His record supports as such if you’re including division titles and playoff wins.

We had some talented teams during his tenure. He was good at establishing a team identity and helping to build the roster. He was mediocre at actual coaching and gave us no competitive edge. His strengths didn't outweigh his weaknesses enough to get us over the hump and we wasted far too long on a guy who had long proven he couldn't get it done. To his credit he was a master of deflection and buying time.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,913
Reaction score
103,784
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
We had some talented teams during his tenure. He was good at establishing a team identity and helping to build the roster. He was mediocre at actual coaching and gave us no competitive edge. His strengths didn't outweigh his weaknesses enough to get us over the hump and we wasted far too long on a guy who had long proven he couldn't get it done. To his credit he was a master of deflection and buying time.

And once he had to venture out on his own without adopted Dad Jerry Jones making excuses for him, he failed miserably.

Fired after less than two years on the job and now an NFL pariah.

jg-usfl.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
Don’t dare attempt to project your own willful ignorance and avoidance on me or anyone rise. That’s all you.



Au contraire. I see them for what they are. Weak excuses and attempts at obfuscation. You throw it out there like it has merit but flee in terror when challenged to support it or discuss the circumstances.



Where did I call you a name? Is this you playing your victim card too early?
The results speak for themself. And I’ll continue to present as such regardless your denial.

“ willful ignorance “ is a personal insult
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
We had some talented teams during his tenure. He was good at establishing a team identity and helping to build the roster. He was mediocre at actual coaching and gave us no competitive edge. His strengths didn't outweigh his weaknesses enough to get us over the hump and we wasted far too long on a guy who had long proven he couldn't get it done. To his credit he was a master of deflection and buying time.
Im not promoting an opinion on his coaching abilities or lack thereof. I’m just providing his results were as or more successful than our other HC’s this era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
Division titles this era or 21st Century:
Garrett 3
Phillips 2
McCarthy 1

Playoff wins this era or 21st Century:
Garrett 2
Phillips 1

Garrett achieved as much or more in his 10 years than the remaining 12 years and 4 other HC combined thus far.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
Stop with wanting to replace Mike McCarthy as Head Coach. You sound ridiculous!

Remember, it is because of Mike McCarthy that Dan Quinn is here and wanting to stay here as D-Coordinator.

Remember, Dan Quinn already was a Head Coach (Atlanta), and he faired very poorly at it. Clearly, the position was too big/much for him. Dan Quinn is better and best when he can solely concentrate at what he does best: be a D-Coordinator.

So stop with the ridiculous and senseless posts of wanting to replace Mike McCarthy as Head Coach with Dan Quinn. This has been going on for the past year (and usually by the same posters), and it's downright not well thought out and ignorant.
I never wanted Fat Mike ,but I don’t see where Quinn has shown that he is any better. After 25+ years of failures, everybody needs to go, including the GM and son.
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,292
Reaction score
11,422
Dan Quinn inherited a team in Atlanta that had a declining offense. Wasn't really given the opportunity to rebuild. It happens. Not exactly the same situation in Dallas.
The declining offense is not an excuse for a horrible defense. It was the same defense that allowed a bad Cowboys team to come back and win.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,913
Reaction score
103,784
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The results speak for themself. And I’ll continue to present as such regardless your denial.

Yesh, they do. But not in the way you’d hoped for. This sad crusade dues nothing but destroy your credibility.

“ willful ignorance “ is a personal insult

Is it? Or is it another truth that you can’t handle?
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,541
Reaction score
21,036
DQ is a better HC than MM. If Matt Ryan didn't choke he'd have a super bowl just like MM and I bet you wouldn't say he's just a coordinator then.

I'm not against DQ as head coach. He did a great job in 2016. But that Super Bowl loss falls squarely on his shoulders. There is a point in time a head coach has to take the reins. That came after the Julio Jones catch. The moment was too big for him. But I'm sure he's learned from it.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
Yesh, they do. But not in the way you’d hoped for. This sad crusade dues nothing but destroy your credibility.



Is it? Or is it another truth that you can’t handle?
Obviously you have misconstrued my narrative which is nothing more than presenting the results that based on the criteria of Division titles and Playoff wins he’s been the most successful Cowboys HC this era.
 
Last edited:

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,913
Reaction score
103,784
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Obviously you have misconstrued my narrative which is nothing more than presenting the results that based on the criteria of Division titles and Playoff wins he’s been the most successful Cowboys HC this era.

No. I haven’t ‘misconstrued’ anything. Your narrative is selective, myopic, disingenuous, and obvious. And your willfully ignore anything that shows that.

You won’t answer questions or “aren’t interested” in the truth of the situation because doing so would destroy that false narrative.
 

Diehardblues

Well-Known Member
Messages
58,628
Reaction score
39,165
No. I haven’t ‘misconstrued’ anything. Your narrative is selective, myopic, disingenuous, and obvious. And your willfully ignore anything that shows that.

You won’t answer questions or “aren’t interested” in the truth of the situation because doing so would destroy that false narrative.
Your just upset that no other HC surpassed his division titles and playoff wins which makes him the most successful Cowboys HC this era thus far.

And I’m not obligated to do anything. The results stand for themself.
 
Top