BraveHeartFan;2731024 said:
Edit: Also it really makes me smile that a poster is already growing tired of the 18 catches thing yet has no trouble having a signature picture mocking the turnovers of Tony Romo which is repeated, and discussed, far more often than Austin and his 18 career catches has been, or ever will be. That's hilarious.
Hilarious how?
My growing tired of hearing the 18 catch BS has to do with how ridiculous I think it is, not the fact that it is being said frequently. Well, I suppose the frequency of a ridiculous comment is a little agitating but its more the comment itself than its frequency.
Its just ridiculous IMO because its obvious as all hell as to why he has 18 catches. He's been a work in progress. Its as if people expected more from the guy and he somehow let them all down. He was undrafted, spent the 1st year returning kicks, got a few looks at WR his second year with the majority coming when TO was hurt and then got a few more looks his 3rd year.
Of course he has had limited production. He's been a project who has had limited opportunities. However, in those opportunities he has shown the ability to get behind defenses but he has also shown why he's a project with the drops he has had.
Its almost painfully obvious. And yet people still throw that out there like its a huge trump card. Like its the end-all to any discussion about the guy. Not another word, just "18 catches". And really, its not a trump card at all because anyone with a memory would realize why he has limited production.
Thats why I've grown tired of the "18 catches" line. It's just not the holy grail that some treat it as. Some people are just summing the guy up by it like that is all he will ever be and I think that is just foolish.
And my mocking Tony is centered around that fact that this team would be much better if he would quit giving the ball away. I don't do it because I think the guy sucks, I do it because I know he's good and know he would be GREAT if he could learn to protect the ball.