Sonny#9
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,613
- Reaction score
- 64
superpunk said:Actually, the Commanders got healthy while the Cowboys continued to hemhorrage LBs...
but spin it however you want.![]()
You obviously have...
superpunk said:Actually, the Commanders got healthy while the Cowboys continued to hemhorrage LBs...
but spin it however you want.![]()
Sonny#9 said:You obviously have...
superpunk said:Actually, the Commanders got healthy while the Cowboys continued to hemhorrage LBs...
but spin it however you want.![]()
Eddie said:We sound like we're making excuses. Injuries are part of the game. Every team faces them.
The bottom line, the Skins swept us, and beat us soundly with the playoffs on the line for us.
BP called it ... we are what we are. We're a 9-7 team.
Skins did what we couldn't in 9 years ... win a playoff game.
Diminishing their accomplishments does nothing to raise the lack of ours.
Skins fans made excuses for 10 years on why they couldn't beat us ... injuries, poor officiating, dropped balls, blown this, blown that.
Are we the ones making excuses now?
Eddie said:Skins fans made excuses for 10 years on why they couldn't beat us ... injuries, poor officiating, dropped balls, blown this, blown that.
Are we the ones making excuses now?
superpunk said:Telling the truth, as opposed to some fairy tale about "having heart" - is spin?
Guess again Norman....
Sonny#9 said:Hows this: your line was awful last year and you signed a bunch of 30-somethings on the dowside of their careers.
Winning 5 in a row doesn't display "heart"? Like you wouldn't championing that word all over the place if the Cowboys had done it.
superpunk said:No, I wouldn't.
And I wouldn't be shredding the Commanders for a lack of heart if they had obviously been destroyed by injuries and finished the year like crap - lord knows I didn't say that about the Eagles or Giants in their playoff game. Even a blind monkey would know that more went into those failures than just a lack of "heart."
But enjoy fairy-land. I'm sure it's wonderful. Let us know when you get back.
Sonny#9 said:Ok, so enlighten me, when they were 7-3, and in great position to make the playoffs - who got hurt that killed their season?
superpunk said:Flozell Adams was already hurt - our offense had been declining since his injury four weeks prior.
Dat Nguyen and Al Singleton - our entire right side of LBs, out. Dat had a little run back late, but he was a non-factor, save for calling out "shovel" lol...
Anthony Henry was hampered the rest of the year with his groin injury - sporadically missing games, and being half there the games he was in.
Rivera was off since the offseason with his back.
Patrick Crayton, JJ, take your pick - the list kept getting bigger.
I guess if they had more heart, they could have prevented such injuries...![]()
Sonny#9 said:So you are contend that it was injuries and not poor play that doomed the Cowboys (despite sitting at a 7-3 record with many of the aforementioned injuries?)
Sonny#9 said:Alright "Troll Slayer" your turn to try reading: My point is even thinking Bledsoe is one of the best QBs in the league is absurd - which is exactly what was written. I am not here saying Brunnel was one of the best, even though they had similar numbers. Come on, now.
That's pretty optimistic considering you added a mediocre guard in Kosier. Fabini was let go from the Jets for performance reasons according to the Jets camp. And you still don't know how Flo's knee is going to hold up. I will grant you if it does - he is a big boost. But it's a question mark, is it not?
OK that was funny, like you weren't red-faced-p.o.-ed.
Yes - they were 7-3 and finished 2-4. The Commanders were 5-6 and finished 5-0. Which do you call showing heart and which to you call quitting?
Again, the Commanders showed heart last year when the Cowboys quit. That is the BIGGEST reason for my optimism.
Sonny#9 said:Hows this: your line was awful last year
and you signed a bunch of 30-somethings on the dowside of their careers.
Winning 5 in a row doesn't display "heart"? Like you wouldn't championing that word all over the place if the Cowboys had done it.
Sonny#9 said:They were able to compile a 7-3 record w/o flo and Rivera. Were they not?
Jansen started 16 games, other than that the others missed 1-3 games uaually at different times. We are talking about the Cowboys being without all those positions for the season. Starting RB, starting RCB, LT, ROLB, LILB, #3 WR ALL gone for long stretches, and at the same time. There is a huge differenceSprings, Griffin, Rogers, Jansen were all hurt for the Commanders. They started Walt Harris and Warrick Holdman for crying out loud.
So you are contend that it was injuries and not poor play that doomed the Cowboys (despite sitting at a 7-3 record with many of the aforementioned injuries?
dthahn said:the New England Patriots!!!
There was an earlier thread about the most overrated coach in the NFL being Bill Bilichick. Part II of that thread focuses on the Patriots as a team. For the last 5 years, most prognosticators have picked the Patriots to win the SuperBowl and with good reason. They won 3 out of 4 SuperBowls while tying the same mark held by our beloved Cowboys.
Currently, the Patriots are a much different team than they were during their Superbowl run. Sure, they still have Tom Brady who is an above average QB, but he is also overrated. However, they have lost the prolific coaching staff that Bilichick inherited from Bill Parcells. They have also lost several of their star players and veteran leaders including Ty Law, Willie McGinist, and Adam Vinatieri.
In my humble opinion, Vinatieri was their true MVP, not Brady. It was Vinatieri who kicked the winning field goal in several of their playoff and SuperBowl victories because Brady couldn't lead them into the endzone. And what do the Patriots do this offseason but let him walk right into the waiting arms of their chief rival, the Colts.
I said it here last year and I'm saying it again this year: Stick a fork in the Patriots because they are DONE!! Every year they fail to make a deep run in the playoffs will only futher underscore how much Parcells contributed to Bilichick's success. That means the Cowboys will play the Colts in the SuperBowl baby!!
superpunk said:The guy went a little voerboard on the BRady angle, but seriously, he's talking about THIS year, people. Not the past 5. he's talking about how different they are than they were for their run - and I agree. The playmakers are all but gone, their LB corps get thinner and thinner with no replacements, the secondary doesn't improve.....they keep getting worse.
superpunk said:Yeah - it's always one thing OR another. It can never be a combination, huh? Try looking past your nose once in a while...if you have the "heart."
Sonny#9 said:Yet you're the one crying a river about injuries this and injuries that. Try and accept the fact that your team were primed for the playoffs and failed utterly. There is NO excuse for getting thrashed by a division rival 35-7 with the playoffs on the line. Injuries or no, there is NO excuse for that kind of play. None.
For years I have had to listen to Cowboy fans run their mouths, now the shoe is on the other foot.
Keep the excuses coming, sour grapes definitely suits you.