blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 42,018
- Reaction score
- 28,633
Here's the thing that was a really nice trade they didn't get to the Super bowl again they have not been to a Super Bowl for longer than we have I believe it was 1995 hours was 1996 as much as we know there are better team than us right now because they keep beating us they still have not won a title in that long can we say 28 years for them or is it 29 I mean I know they've been to the title games and been to the Super bowl that McCaffrey trade did not put them over the top hell they were with garoppolo and a handful of no name running backs and got to the Super bowl and now with Purdy and McCaffrey they did not make the Super bowl nor did they win it so there's a little overrated to say somehow that trade was a great trade because it did not turn out to be an epic over the top move even though he is doing well still his salary being 15 million next year 15,000,000 the next year or whatever it is I don't know what the cap it is I think it's 19 million with this bonus money each year that they owe him is that really something that people should do still pay $19 million for running back when they literally did not get to the Super bowl because it was about the running back they might have been able to what win without Purdy?? But what you're doing is using one isolated event one trade that actually worked out where he's actually performing very well while he's staying healthy but it literally didn't make them better than they were before they've already been to the Super bowl they've already been to title games without McCaffrey..See McCaffrey, Christian trade.
I mean you saw the Kansas City did with a bunch of nobodies at running back or I wanna call nobodies but they weren't big names they weren't paid well and even the Eagles made it to the Super bowl with Sanders and then decided to change him out I mean I think that that's the point the guy was trying to make... You just can't do that cause in most cases it does not work out...