The NFCE will be won week 17

No we will win out till the final giants game..then it wont matter
 
CanadianCowboysFan;4277157 said:
Giants often beat teams they shouldn't then choke against those they should.

Packers are due to lose for sure.

Still, all this fear about the Arizona game is funny.

I wouldn't call it fear. Let's face it we've just narrowly escaped the last 2 weeks, and if were not in our game this week we could get caught slipping.

I have a funny feeling the giants are going to beat the packers. This could be coughlin's final stand. I honestly don't think the giants are going to pack it in, so I'm expecting a huge effort. I just want to stay out in front and keep whining. Philly has already imploded, and the giants are on the brink. We can't give the giants any life by losing on Sunday.
 
GloryDaysRBack;4276879 said:
First and foremost, I am not even certain we will beat the Cardinals this weekend.

We just need to take care of our business and stop all the talk of when we are winning the East. Especially given our struggles to win the last two weeks.
 
The Giants game last night against the Saints was similar to the Cowboys beatdown by the Eagles.

I don't think either one has much significance. If we put pressure on Eli, we win. If not, he has good receivers and will pick us apart and we have to win a shootout. Home or away, it will be the same.
 
I don't like our chances if it comes down to a do or die situation playing the Giants at their place. We need to take care of business leading up to that game.
 
We'll beat the Giants in two weeks. I feel very confident about that. I just hope the players aren't looking forward to that game this coming Sunday. I doubt they are.
 
If we beat Arizona, NY loses to GB (both likely scenarios) and we beat NY the next week, I believe we clinch the division being up three games with three to play. After that, we can't possibly finish with a worse division record than NY (we could both finish 3-3) and we would be assured of a better record against NFC teams.

The final three games of the year might be just for playoff positioning.
 
The30YardSlant;4277437 said:
The final three games of the year might be just for playoff positioning.

There wouldn't be much positioning to worry about. No way we're catching either the Packers or the 49ers. And really, what's the difference between the #3 and #4 seeds? Neither gets a bye and both get home field advantage in the first round. Yes, as the #3 you would theoretically get to play the weaker team in the first round (#6 versus #5) but is there really going to be any difference between the two? I could easily envision the #6 actually being a more difficult matchup for us than the #5, so why should we kill ourselves trying to catch the Saints for the #3?

No, I think the greatest reward lies in the fact that we could essentially treat the final two games against the Eagles and Giants as preseason games, give the starters some extra time to heal up and recharge and get our backups some more game experience. And the fact that we would essentially be able to start game-planning for the playoffs on December 12th would be huge.
 
^^^^ diff is playing GB rd 2 vs never or conf champ game
 
GloryDaysRBack;4277487 said:
^^^^ diff is playing GB rd 2 vs never or conf champ game

And that's better how? We'll be a fresher team in round 2, Green Bay should be warmer in round 2 versus round 3, and let's face it, we're gonna have to go through Green Bay sooner or later. Might as well be sooner.
 
cowboys2233;4277475 said:
There wouldn't be much positioning to worry about. No way we're catching either the Packers or the 49ers. .

Why can't we catch SF? We're two back with five to play and we own the head to head tiebreaker. They still play Pittsburgh and Seattle on the road.
 
cowboys2233;4277497 said:
And that's better how? We'll be a fresher team in round 2, Green Bay should be warmer in round 2 versus round 3, and let's face it, we're gonna have to go through Green Bay sooner or later. Might as well be sooner.

First if all, there is no difference between the third week of January and the fourth week of January in Wisconsin. It's going to be freaking cold. Second, any team playing GB wants it to be as cold as possible. GB isnt built to win games in the wind and snow.
 
The30YardSlant;4277544 said:
Why can't we catch SF? We're two back with five to play and we own the head to head tiebreaker. They still play Pittsburgh and Seattle on the road.

Something to keep an eye on. They play Pittsburgh in week 15, if they lose that game and we've won all of ours up to that point, then yes, maybe we think about the #2 seed. If they are still two up with two to play, I think we focus less on playoff seeding and focus more on playoff readiness because there is no way they go 0-2 against St. Louis and Seattle.

Really, I just want this team to be healthy and well rested heading into the playoffs. Then bring 'em all on because if we have a full complement of players, we are going to be one seriously tough team to contend with.
 
The30YardSlant;4277550 said:
First if all, there is no difference between the third week of January and the fourth week of January in Wisconsin. It's going to be freaking cold. Second, any team playing GB wants it to be as cold as possible. GB isnt built to win games in the wind and snow.

I took a look -- the fourth week of January might actually be warmer than the third week because February's average temperature is about 4 degrees warmer than January's.

The average high in Green Bay in January? 24 degrees. The average low in Green Bay in January? 9 degrees. Yikes.

Yes, Green Bay is a pass first, pass second team. But don't believe for one second that colder, windier, snowier conditions would be to our advantage. The warmer it is in Green Bay, the better for us.
 
Murray separates his shoulder and leads team to stirring victory. Fantastic.
 
The30YardSlant;4277550 said:
First if all, there is no difference between the third week of January and the fourth week of January in Wisconsin. It's going to be freaking cold. Second, any team playing GB wants it to be as cold as possible. GB isnt built to win games in the wind and snow.

Eli had a pretty successful day throwing the ball there in Jan 2008, but there was no wind to speak of. Of course, we'd be facing a young Rodgers on top of his game, not an aging Favre.
 
The30YardSlant;4277544 said:
Why can't we catch SF? We're two back with five to play and we own the head to head tiebreaker. They still play Pittsburgh and Seattle on the road.
We'd have to pass both SF and NO, and neither has a terribly difficult schedule. It's possible, but extremely unlikely, that we'll be in the hunt for a bye. The one thing we do have going for us is that we control all the tiebreakers.
 
tupperware;4277406 said:
I don't like our chances if it comes down to a do or die situation playing the Giants at their place. We need to take care of business leading up to that game.
I agree
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,271
Messages
14,526,815
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top