The offensive line . . .

Angus

Active Member
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
20
I thought the line played pretty well until the later period when Adams seemed to run out of gas. The middle of the line held off the push from the middle of the Jacksonville defensive line for the most part.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
yeah, I thought they did a pretty good job. They let em through a couple times but other than that, it was definitely not a trainwreck
 

Draegerman

Internet Somebody
Messages
3,706
Reaction score
4
It sounded as if Parcells wanted to hang Adams out to dry during the post-game PC but he held his comments, saying that he'd wait until he saw the film on the offensive lineman.

Regardless, it ain't going to be pretty for these guys come next team meeting & practice.
 

ratpower

New Member
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
Sorry, the O-Line is what it is, mediocre at best. There was no running game and their defense did not even blitz and had pressure on Bledsoe from the 2nd qtr on. Just because there are no sacks, does not mean the line did well.

The only hope we have is to pass first to open the run with these guys...either way we never upgraded our biggest weakness from last year...that's on BP.
 

Ashwynn

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,777
Reaction score
500
ratpower said:
Sorry, the O-Line is what it is, mediocre at best. There was no running game and their defense did not even blitz and had pressure on Bledsoe from the 2nd qtr on. Just because there are no sacks, does not mean the line did well.

The only hope we have is to pass first to open the run with these guys...either way we never upgraded our biggest weakness from last year...that's on BP.
:fact: :popcorn:
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
this Oline played like crap...again no run game and pass blocking was weak
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
ratpower said:
Sorry, the O-Line is what it is, mediocre at best. There was no running game and their defense did not even blitz and had pressure on Bledsoe from the 2nd qtr on. Just because there are no sacks, does not mean the line did well.

The only hope we have is to pass first to open the run with these guys...either way we never upgraded our biggest weakness from last year...that's on BP.
Wuhhh??? Did you even watch the game? They blitzed quite a bit.
 

ZeroClub

just trying to get better
Messages
7,619
Reaction score
1
The OL was inconsistent and is likely to remain that way through the season, particularly against the better defenses.

If that's reality, then the team needs to deal with it, and play the QB that gives them the best chance to win given the limitations of the OL.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
Our backs averaged over 4 yards a carry. Sorry but some people are really seeming to take stupid pills after losses.

i think Im going to call it Drew Bledsoe syndrome.
 

Little Jr

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
2,337
IMO the OL played ok. As far as us not running the ball very well was due mostly to the great game plan of running the ball right up the midde on a D who is know to be one of the best right up the middle.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
I don't know what game you all were watching, but the OL was horrible.

They made freakin' SPICER look like Reggie White for krissakes!


The interior OL was below average, and both our tackles were horrible.

And to top it all off, Bledsoe handled the pressure like a rookie.


And JuJo did good when he had a gaping hole to run through, and was his usually "run into the pile" self when he didn't have a nice perfect gaping hole to run through.


And that PI call on Witten was garbage. Randy Moss commits worse PI penalties then that when he running routes on air. Seriousy, that was f'in weak.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
FuzzyLumpkins said:
Our backs averaged over 4 yards a carry. Sorry but some people are really seeming to take stupid pills after losses.

i think Im going to call it Drew Bledsoe syndrome.

:hammer:

btw, this Jax D was top 5 in the NFL in sacks last year, we did good pass-blocking considering we dont' have an elite line
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
Future 585 said:
this Oline played like crap...again no run game and pass blocking was weak

No run game?

We averaged 4 YPC against an outstanding front 7.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
big dog cowboy said:
Jax might have the best D-line in football.



That's a load of crap. Their DEs are average on a good day, and half their interior DL didn't even play.



At their strongest they aren't in the running for "Best DL in football".
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Rack said:
That's a load of crap. Their DEs are average on a good day, and half their interior DL didn't even play.



At their strongest they aren't in the running for "Best DL in football".

but still, this D had 47 sacks a year ago, and it's essentially the same minus Stroud
 

Little Jr

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
2,337
summerisfunner said:
:hammer:

btw, this Jax D was top 5 in the NFL in sacks last year, we did good pass-blocking considering we dont' have an elite line


I guess that my point. I dont expect them to play like Indys OL. So for what we have I thought we did ok. I think they'll get better as the year goes on. This loss falls on the shoulders of the coaching staff and Bledsoe.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
and if Bledsoe connected on some throws, we wouldn't be pointing out how "horrible" the line looked
 
Top