The one player you don't trust

Vintage · May 25, 2015

Hardy, obviously, since he likes to slap women around.

DallasEast · May 25, 2015

KJJ said:
The point is you've done it just like everyone else here. FANS do it all the time telling everyone "no way the Cowboys lose and you can book it!" That was repeated by many (Not me) prior to the Washington game last season. lol I'm not as sure about a lot of things as Cowboy FANS are.

I understand KJJ. You say proclaiming something infrequently equates to repeatedly proclaiming something continuously. Kinda like labeling someone who speaks occasionally as a motormouth. Same "thing." Cool.

I love it when you start the repeating FANS thang. Do it again.

5Stars · May 25, 2015

DallasEast said:
I understand KJJ. You say proclaiming something infrequently equates to repeatedly proclaiming something continuously. Kinda like labeling someone who speaks occasionally as a motormouth. Same "thing." Cool.

I love it when you start the repeating FANS thang. Do it again.

I love Cowboy FANS.

DFWJC · May 25, 2015

Vintage said:
Hardy, obviously, since he likes to slap women around.

Has he ever slapped or hit a woman as far as you know?
yes or no

DallasEast · May 25, 2015

5Stars said:
I love Cowboy FANS.

Careful. He states it in a condescending manner.

KJJ · May 25, 2015

DallasEast said:
I understand KJJ. You say proclaiming something infrequently equates to repeatedly proclaiming something continuously. Kinda like labeling someone who speaks occasionally as a motormouth. Same "thing." Cool.

I love it when you start the repeating FANS thang. Do it again.

You like everyone else has posted some absolutes thanks for proving my point now go waste someone else's time.

DallasEast · May 25, 2015

KJJ said:
You like everyone else has posted some absolutes thanks for proving my point now go waste someone else's time.

And that is the same as speaking absolutes all... the... time...

You really don't believe you can order someone around on this site, do you?

KJJ · May 25, 2015

DallasEast said:
And that is the same as speaking absolutes all... the... time...

You really don't believe you can order someone around on this site, do you?

I don't speak absolutes all the time and stop trying to stir up trouble.

DallasEast · May 25, 2015

KJJ said:
I don't speak absolutes all the time and stop trying to stir up trouble.

True, you don't speak in absolutes all the time. Just most of the time.

Curious. You do believe you can order other members to do your bidding. You may wish to consider asking politely and seeing what happens afterwards. That's just a suggestion though. I respect your independence and free will.

KJJ · May 25, 2015

AsthmaField said:
The Seattle defense wore out because the Dallas offense kept the ball for almost 40 of the 60 min. of the game. It wore out because its own offense kept going 3-and-out and punting the ball back to the Dallas offense. It wore out because of the OL and TE's bowling them over for 2/3 of the entire game. It wore out because Romo kept converting his 3rd down throws and extending the drives so that Murray could have some more chances to run the ball.

They didn't wear out because Murray was hitting them hard at the end of his runs. I remember seeing about 3 or so hits that Murray delivered to DB's, but I also remember seeing Randle do it at the end of his big run.

If it was simply the size and toughness of the running back... M Lynch would have worn Dallas out and gained a lot of yards. He didn't because Seattle didn't have the OL to do so, or the passing game to extend drives and wear out the other team's defense. There is no doubt that Lynch is better at the "dirty yards" than Murray is... but that mattered not at all in that game, even with Dallas turning the ball over a few times.

It was a combination of all of those things that had Seattle on the ropes by the end of the game. It was the cumulative effect of all of that which was wearing down Seattle's D and showing the entire nation what it looks like for a defense to be whipped and want no more. By the last few min of the game... the Legion of Boom just wanted the game to end, and you could tell plain as day.

I absolutely loved watching that... and I'm sure you did too.

The issue that I have is that so many are equating playing that kind of offense with having Demarco Murray, when in reality, it was a combination of all the things I mentioned. Murray was just a small part of that.

If I thought that had walked out of the door along with Murray... I'd be upset too. The thing is, I think it was the totality of the Dallas offense. Murray couldn't have done it on his own, just like a bigger, stronger Lynch couldn't do it on his own either.

Julius Jones didn't have anywhere near the same caliber offense that he was playing with... the OL in particular. His time running behind Torrin Tucker, Al Johnson, Pat McQuistan and Rob Pettiti wasn't very productive. That line didn't give him consistent lanes or movement up front. He did have a couple of good OL on that unit... but as a whole, that OL was poorly coached and didn't work very well.

I'm not going to argue about this very much though. I have no more idea of how it will play out than you do. We do want the same thing though: the run game to continue to build off of what we saw last season. I think it will and you worry that it won't. That's cool though.

I think we've covered this enough instead of continuing to argue this let's see how it plays out in 2015.

Clove · May 25, 2015

Tony Romo

KJJ · May 25, 2015

DallasEast said:
True, you don't speak in absolutes all the time. Just most of the time.

Curious. You do believe you can order other members to do your bidding. You may wish to consider asking politely and seeing what happens afterwards. That's just a suggestion though. I respect your independence and free will.

Posting "many" absolutes" doesn't mean it's done most of the time and this discussion is over!

DallasEast · May 25, 2015

KJJ said:
Posting "many" absolutes" doesn't mean it's done most of the time and this discussion is over!

That's your interpretation. I disagree. And you can end the discussion at this point without replying again--if you so choose.

LatinMind · May 25, 2015

big dog cowboy said:
Sean Lee

Side note: Randle doesn't scare me in the least.

Me either.

For me the player i dont trust is Wilcox. Lee and McClain have to do with injuries. Wilcox for me is just makes too many mental errors. Cheats his assignments and gets caught.

DTown214 · May 25, 2015

Don't trust Sean Lee to stay healthy

big dog cowboy · May 25, 2015

Clove said:
Tony Romo

So predictable.

xvendettax914 · May 25, 2015

big dog cowboy said:
So predictable.

Tony could win a superbowl and would still not be shown any respect.

big dog cowboy · May 25, 2015

xvendettax914 said:
Tony could win a superbowl and would still not be shown any respect.

Unfortunately for some in our fan base that is 100% true. It really gets me how underappreciated he is considering what our QB situation was like after Aikman. Replacing him will be no easy task.

BAT · May 25, 2015

My answer is Weeden. I don't trust him to do his job. At all.

xvendettax914 · May 25, 2015

BAT said:
My answer is Weeden. I don't trust him to do his job. At all.

Heres to hoping he doesnt have to.

The one player you don't trust

The Cult of Jib

Cowboys 24/7/365

Here comes the Sun...

Well-Known Member

Cowboys 24/7/365

You Have an Axe to Grind

Cowboys 24/7/365

You Have an Axe to Grind

Cowboys 24/7/365

You Have an Axe to Grind

Shrinkage

You Have an Axe to Grind

Cowboys 24/7/365

iPhotoshop

Well-Known Member

THE BIG DOG

Well-Known Member

THE BIG DOG

Mr. Fixit

Well-Known Member