Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
stash is the MAN!
fannypack;2838356 said:You guys are silly.
To assume you can get into the first round and grab a player makes no sense when you see we had multiple positions we needed to fill. How much of our later rounds picks do we have to throw at a team to go into the first?
I think his point is that we had a 2nd round pick that we could have gotten had we tried to move ahead a little bit.
On the flipside to that, since the Cowboys saw that he hadn't be taken yet, was there really a lot to go on to automatically know that Seattle was going to take him? Maybe, maybe not. This is a case of hindsight.
bbgun;2838321 said:What is it with you and receivers??
the kid 05;2838246 said:the one that got away..guys and serial killers have that problem have you ever noticed that?
fannypack;2838388 said:Yeah it's kind of a weird thing how this worked out.
Before Garrett figured out how to utilize Choice, or before anyone knew how good Choice was it was too late. That's of course assuming Choice can keep this production up.
Now we have a WR corps in which we're expecting the other WR's to step up, which I think they CAN do, problem is, they seem to have a lot of injury concerns.
So what I could possibly see happening is our WR's become less of a deep threat and we depend more on our running game. Should our only viable option as a deep threat go down (Miles) we can kind of figure out what defenses will do to stop our running game.
Speaking of Choice... He's a great example of why you don't cavalierly throw mid-round picks into draft trades. What if Butler or Brandon Williams or Mike Hamlin become outstanding players? We could have missed out on them by giving up too much for one guy in a trade up.fannypack;2838388 said:Yeah it's kind of a weird thing how this worked out.
Before Garrett figured out how to utilize Choice, or before anyone knew how good Choice was it was too late. That's of course assuming Choice can keep this production up.
stasheroo;2838238 said:No, I'm still not over it.
I think the Cowboys will be regretting this 'non-move' for years to come.
Seahawks envision key role for Unger
Posted July 09, 2009 @ 4:02 p.m.
By Dan Arkush
The consensus among our Seahawks sources is that second-round OL Max Unger's talent is simply too good to not be a starter this season. That said, just where the versatile Unger figures in the starting mix — left guard, right guard or perhaps center, his primary position at Oregon — remains unclear heading into training camp. Up to now, he has spent most of his time at left guard, with incumbent Mike Wahle still on the mend from shoulder surgery, but he has also put in time at center. In any event, daily team observers believe Unger, who reminds them a lot of former Seahawks jack-of-all-trades OL Chris Gray, will be on the field a great deal. “They’re really high on Unger,” one source said. “He’s very sound technically and real scrappy. I like him more every time I talk to him. He is definitely not intimidated. You can tell that he just gets it. He played in a similar spread offense at Oregon, and (Seahawks O-line coach Mike) Solari loves linemen who can play multiple positions.”
speedkilz88;2838243 said:The Seahawks traded in front of the Cowboys to get Unger, there is nothing to regret.. Give them the credit for doing a great job of scouting the Cowboys.
Chocolate Lab;2838419 said:Speaking of Choice... He's a great example of why you don't cavalierly throw mid-round picks into draft trades. What if Butler or Brandon Williams or Mike Hamlin become outstanding players? We could have missed out on them by giving up too much for one guy in a trade up.
Apollo Creed;2838813 said:Bobby Carpenter was taken one spot ahead of Antonio Cromartie.
We took Anthony Fasano instead of Devin Hester.
And the beat goes on.
Joe Rod;2838255 said:I like sandwiches
stasheroo;2838376 said:Glad to see that somebody gets my point.
Hey, if nothing else, I've given people something to talk about...
: