Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 89,102
- Reaction score
- 211,507
the rushing yards leader hasn't fared to well either
The key is to not run or pass that well.
the rushing yards leader hasn't fared to well either
For all the people obsessed with Dak, they really don't recognize how much better this defense is than the defenses Romo had most years. That isn't to say that this defense is perfect, but a good QB should be winning with this cast and crew.
Dak defenses ranked by points
2019 - 9th
2018 - 7th
2017- 13th
2016 - 5th
Romo defenses ranked by points
2014 - 15th
2013 - 26th
2012 - 24th
2011 - 16th
2010 - 31st
2009 - 2nd
2008 - 20th
2007 - 13th
2006 - 20th
If you look at 2007, 2009, 2014, they were all Romo's best years. One year with a top 10 defense. Prescott has had a top 10 defense 3 of 4 years. And the worst year he has had was 13th. Romo had a defense like that 2 of 9 years. Let's face reality. If they had allowed Romo to continue playing and used Prescott as a backup, this team may have seen more success. The rush to push out Romo because Prescott was beating bad teams in 2016 was misguided.
Romo with an offensive line, a running game, and defense... He never had that compliment. In 2009 he had no offensive line. In 2007 the defense was okay, not great. Also didn't have the best pass blocking line.
Romo should have been allowed to return and compete for his job in 2016 and had he, he would have won his job back. It definitely could have been our year.
IDK, ya ever read the OP before posting???!!!!!!!!!Passing yards leader has never won a SB
but dont ya think it's a team game vs a one man gang?
never heard of the term...defenses wins Championships?
No rookie quarterback led team has ever competed for or won a Super Bowl. Yet, euphoria intoxication convinced Jason Garrett and Jerry Jones (along with a significant number of people following the sport who usually disagree with how either man thinks) the possibility was more than worth the gamble. It will be interesting whether another team in similar circumstances--blessed with a red hot rookie quarterback, decent all-around team and an injured veteran franchise quarterback medically cleared to return to the starting lineup--duplicates the same decision in the untold seasons to come.Romo should have been allowed to return and compete for his job in 2016 and had he, he would have won his job back. It definitely could have been our year.
the rushing yards leader hasn't fared to well either
this is a depressing list. none of their teams is really doing well. why? because probably their teams are always coming from behind in games and have to pass their way to catch up and probably playing some against prevent defenses, racking up meaningless yards.....I agree on stats but the top 5 in passing yards this season aren't doing so great.
I was begging for them to put Romo back when he healed from his injury. that was a Jerry call. jersey's were flying off the shelves.....No rookie quarterback led team has ever competed for or won a Super Bowl. Yet, euphoria intoxication convinced Jason Garrett and Jerry Jones (along with a significant number of people following the sport who usually disagree with how either man thinks) the possibility was more than worth the gamble. It will be interesting whether another team in similar circumstances--blessed with a red hot rookie quarterback, decent all-around team and an injured veteran franchise quarterback medically cleared to return to the starting lineup--duplicates the same decision in the untold seasons to come.
Show me one post where someone "clamored for Dak to put up more passing yards". Just 1 is all I ask.
I just have to note that being the passing yards leader frequently means:
- You are playing from behind
- You are playing with a long field, frequently having to go 80 yards
- You are struggling to run the ball
Basically, things that are not conducive to winning. The fact that Dak is capable of racking up the yardage is a good thing. The fact that he has to is not.
lol. I disagree with any insinuation Jones made his decision based on greed. In my opinion, Jones completely believed he had a replacement franchise quarterback and exercised his authority to make a long-term decision with only two months of observation as qualifying evidence. It was not the first time Jones pulled the trigger on a player starting.I was begging for them to put Romo back when he healed from his injury. that was a Jerry call. jersey's were flying off the shelves.....
the jersey sales was a sarcasm, but to make a decision like that was very premature, perhaps the tie breaker was the fans arses in the seats, the additional marketing revenue and jersey sales....Jerry always makes tie breaker decisions not on football related matters, but marketing and sales related matters...he is a master marketing man....he has been selling us average for 25 years and we are all buying....lol. I disagree with any insinuation Jones made his decision based on greed. In my opinion, Jones completely believed he had a replacement franchise quarterback and exercised his authority to make a long-term decision with only two months of observation as qualifying evidence. It was not the first time Jones pulled the trigger on a player starting.