All biases aside, a case could be made for Romo or Rodgers. I don't have a problem with Rodgers winning it. But I have a problem for people not even considering Romo when I think they both deserve it equally. To be honest, this would be the ideal year for Co-MVPs. Rodgers has more yards and TDs, but Romo did miss an entire game and then about half of the Commanders game. Rodgers' stats are impressive because he gained a lot of yards and TDs but still barely threw any INTs. Usually when a QB throws a lot, they're more prone to INTs. Romo's stats are impressive because, although he didn't get as many yards as other QBs, he had the highest completion percentage while still have the highest yards per completion. Usually when a QB completes a high percentage of passes, he makes a lot of short, easy throws. Both QBs were very impressive and got their teams 12 wins. I'd say they both should win.