The rest of the NFL game thread

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
3,617

Aerolithe_Lion

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,626
Reaction score
12,700

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,037
Reaction score
6,352

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
3,617
Could be counting the playoff games
I believe, given that the INTs are the same for both sources and he had a 4 INT playoff game, what is happening is ESPN in this case is separating whether the fumbles are occurring while he is rushing versus when he is passing. That is the root cause of the discrepancy.
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
3,617
Did you even bother to read the stats?
dude there are crazy articles all the time
Not only did I read your stat link, I gave you multiple sources with DIFFERENT numbers and a source from the exact same site that references the 60 turnover number. You should probably check my link AND the photo from a secondary source that backs that link AND the article written from your source that backs my link. Basically I came with multiple receipts.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,037
Reaction score
6,352
I believe, given that the INTs are the same for both sources and he had a 4 INT playoff game, what is happening is ESPN in this case is separating whether the fumbles are occurring while he is rushing versus when he is passing. That is the root cause of the discrepancy.
any way you look at it saying he has 66 turnovers is wrong. Its bad but not THAT BAD
 

atlantacowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,082
Reaction score
26,360
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Tony Pollard almost broke one for 6 in overtime vs the Patriots. The announcers said Tony Pollard one of the best backs at getting yards after contact.
Pollard was better splitting carries than carrying the whole workload. You can see his numbers decline as his carries per game increases. Him and Rico would have made a nice backfield. The problem isn't so much that we lost him and his big play ability but that we didn't replace his production or talent. A smart team would have drafted a running back or signed Derrick Henry. We aren't a smart team.
 

Adreme

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,807
Reaction score
3,617
any way you look at it saying he has 66 turnovers is wrong. Its bad but not THAT BAD
Except multiple sources put it at 66. Now maybe all of those sources are wrong or he has 66 turnovers. Its much easier to explain why your source is missing data then it is to try and say every other source, including the writers on the site you used as a source, are wrong. He had 60 turnovers going into this year and another 7 so far this year.
 

gtb1943

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,037
Reaction score
6,352
Not only did I read your stat link, I gave you multiple sources with DIFFERENT numbers and a source from the exact same site that references the 60 turnover number. You should probably check my link AND the photo from a secondary source that backs that link AND the article written from your source that backs my link. Basically I came with multiple receipts.
https://www.nfl.com/players/trevor-lawrence/stats/career
here is NFL WEBSITE with the same stats as ESPN
so I have multiple receipts that outclass yours easily
 
Top