ShortRound
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,919
- Reaction score
- 82,933
lol we have Jerry Jones giving us emotional speeches
https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/trevor-lawrence-stats-career-turnovers
https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/trevor-lawrence-stats-career-turnovers
To use ESPN by the way here is an article FROM ESPN where they cite his 60 turnovers (first sentence of paragraph 6 dont worry they are 1 sentence paragraphs largely).
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...terback-trevor-lawrence-turnover-problem-2023
And a fun bonus one from CBS.
Not sure what you are saying they are paying more then Hurts?When the Eagles play the Cowboys next week it will be the 4th out of their last five opponents that are paying a QB more than the Philly pays Hurts.
https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/trevor-lawrence-stats-career-turnovers
To use ESPN by the way here is an article FROM ESPN where they cite his 60 turnovers (first sentence of paragraph 6 dont worry they are 1 sentence paragraphs largely).
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...terback-trevor-lawrence-turnover-problem-2023
And a fun bonus one from CBS.
I believe, given that the INTs are the same for both sources and he had a 4 INT playoff game, what is happening is ESPN in this case is separating whether the fumbles are occurring while he is rushing versus when he is passing. That is the root cause of the discrepancy.Could be counting the playoff games
I think he means playing, not paying. Playing a QB more then they are paying Hurts.Not sure what you are saying they are paying more then Hurts?
I don't think soCould be counting the playoff games
lol we have Jerry Jones giving us emotional speeches
I think he’s talking about Hurts’ low 2024 cap hitNot sure what you are saying they are paying more then Hurts?
Not only did I read your stat link, I gave you multiple sources with DIFFERENT numbers and a source from the exact same site that references the 60 turnover number. You should probably check my link AND the photo from a secondary source that backs that link AND the article written from your source that backs my link. Basically I came with multiple receipts.Did you even bother to read the stats?
dude there are crazy articles all the time
any way you look at it saying he has 66 turnovers is wrong. Its bad but not THAT BADI believe, given that the INTs are the same for both sources and he had a 4 INT playoff game, what is happening is ESPN in this case is separating whether the fumbles are occurring while he is rushing versus when he is passing. That is the root cause of the discrepancy.
I think 2nd quarter, tossed for throwing a punch.When did Puka go out?
Pollard was better splitting carries than carrying the whole workload. You can see his numbers decline as his carries per game increases. Him and Rico would have made a nice backfield. The problem isn't so much that we lost him and his big play ability but that we didn't replace his production or talent. A smart team would have drafted a running back or signed Derrick Henry. We aren't a smart team.Tony Pollard almost broke one for 6 in overtime vs the Patriots. The announcers said Tony Pollard one of the best backs at getting yards after contact.
Except multiple sources put it at 66. Now maybe all of those sources are wrong or he has 66 turnovers. Its much easier to explain why your source is missing data then it is to try and say every other source, including the writers on the site you used as a source, are wrong. He had 60 turnovers going into this year and another 7 so far this year.any way you look at it saying he has 66 turnovers is wrong. Its bad but not THAT BAD
At least they had the sense to pick it upThose idiots really tried to throw a flag there smfh
https://www.nfl.com/players/trevor-lawrence/stats/careerNot only did I read your stat link, I gave you multiple sources with DIFFERENT numbers and a source from the exact same site that references the 60 turnover number. You should probably check my link AND the photo from a secondary source that backs that link AND the article written from your source that backs my link. Basically I came with multiple receipts.