LocimusPrime
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 34,091
- Reaction score
- 92,903
This is a very silly post. But I'll indulge. I'd trade a top-3 RB for Ziggy Ansah in a heartbeat.
Ansah is good. I like him too
This is a very silly post. But I'll indulge. I'd trade a top-3 RB for Ziggy Ansah in a heartbeat.
Sherman is largely a product of that defense. As was Norman in Carolina.
Just like Dixon Edwards, Larry Brown, Russell Maryland, Robert Jones, Darrin Smith, James Washington, and so many other Cowboys that got paid huge money in the 90s by other teams, then were just average dudes afterward.
My point is, there's only so much a corner or safety can do. Defense is about a collection of several of the right parts. It takes a lot of players; that's why it's so hard to build a truly dominant defense.
Who were the "great" defensive players on the Cowboys in the 90s? Haley, Woodson..........? Deion and Lett later. That's it. Tolbert, Hennings, Marion, Brown, Edwards, Smith, Jones, Everett, Casillas.....there was the same talent level on other teams.
It's about the sum of the parts.
So is Offense. You need 10 other guys to make a running game work. It's not just the RB.
True, but an elite running back can do so much more for a team than other positions with an adequate or better line.
He's a game-breaking runner, a key decoy, a dangerous receiver, an important blocker, and a major concern that defenses have to prepare for all week.
Not true so much for a safety.
True, but an elite running back can do so much more for a team than other positions with an adequate or better line.
<cut>
I think you nailed my problem with picking EE. I really don't think most people realize it, and it is simple.
You are correct, an elite running back can do great with a good line.
A good QB can seem great with a good line...............
But the same thing holds true for the defense.
Running games stop with a really good line.
Passing games stop with a really good line.
Safety's, LB's, CB's can be GREAT when they can gamble on things happening because the LINE is getting pressure.
When you worry about a shiny new button instead of the quality of the fabric and the holes in it -- you might just be looking a little foolish and not able to win consistently in that shirt.......and I don't care how good of a button it is.
OK, let's say they draft a really good defensive lineman. Typically, he won't be elite for 2-3 years. And he'll need another draft pick or two to go with him. Get that next year, and he'll take another 2-3 years to get there, too.
Now, Romo is gone. So........
And good defensive lines don't stop elite offenses in the NFL anyway. You can quick-throw you're way out of pass rush issues if you have the weapons.
I agree on all accounts.
yes, defensive linemen usually take longer to develop because strength is a huge variable for them, much like OL, and most don't develop the sustained strength until 25 or so. (*Just as a note - Dallas doesn't seem to draft via strength)
I agree with good defensive lines don't stop elite offenses in the NFL anyway. Elite defenses stop elite offenses in the NFL. Quick passes are nice but they can be defended as well - usually coming with PICK 6 because routes can be jumped.
But three years ago Romo was awful and people were calling for his head. A few drafts of mainly upper echelon linemen and Romo is an elite QB. Murray was an oft-injured waste of a 3rd round pick, till a few drafts of upper echelon linemen and he becomes the rushing leader.
The same thing can happen with the defense if they will put the correct people in place. Romo with Dmac -- top 8 offense. Romo with Zeke -- top 3 offense.
Defense -- bottom 10 either way.............NO way to get to the top 15 or so, so no way to win a championship.
If Defense had been added, then maybe they went from 30 to 20 and to 15 next year, and maybe to 10 by '18.
Then you would have had Romo in his waining years with a top 10 offense, and a top 10 defense.
Now, IMO, you have one shiny new button on a pretty shirt in front, but one with massive holes on the other side.
Maybe you will be correct.........but I think you think like Jerry......and that hasn't worked for the last 20 years, so why would it work now????
The defense is more talented than the 12-4 defense of two years ago.
Offensive success will greatly help them be better.
Offense doesn't stop 3rd and 2.
Dallas Power ranking last year was 30th. 76% of the time, the other team succeeded in converting according to footballoutsiders.com stats. Dallas' defense is WEAK and undersized.
So how much more talented is it?
I have great HOPES for Thornton, but Dallas would have been best served, IMO, fixing this line with high draft pieces.
Like who? Collins and Tapper?
None of the top defensive linemen taken were projected as elite, but the depth was considered outstanding.
My point is that we had tons more resources than Denver did to get the next franchise QB if that is what Jerry really wanted. And Denver got him anyway. This draft was a poor use of resources and value based on what we knew going in.
even if it was Andrew Billings, who was known for his strength, or AShawn Robinson, or Sheldon Rankins...........or maybe 2 of them with a trade down..............................Strength and Speed wins.........and Dallas seems to have forgotten the strength part of it.
And you really believe that? That is your option. Love how you guys ignore the fact that our two starting DE's are suspended for 4 games. Even when they come back neither guy is anything close to a top notch player.
You say that as if it's a bad thing. Who gives a crap about the chiefs?
It's bad when someone tries to talk about them like they are familiar and knowledgeable about them.
So who appointed you the "don't talk about things you're not familiar with" police. Roll your eyes and move on like the rest of us that detected the BS.
I did. And it's the "don't pretend to know about something and use falsehoods to make points" police.