Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,834
- Reaction score
- 103,559
That's aot of missed games, and it will only get worse as he ages.
Better watch what you say, they'll come for you.
That's aot of missed games, and it will only get worse as he ages.
Really? So what is it them a good omen? The team's projected starter got taken out of a game after 3 plays and everyone should turn a blind eye to that?
It's amazing what people will tell themselves in the name of fandom.
Do you want to compare Manning's games missed due to injury to Romo's? I doubt it.
So no answers again.
Just what I thought.
Your desire is to state the obvious and cry about it.
The reality is every QB can get knocked out on any play...ask Carson Wentz.
What does this change at this point?
So he plays all 16...great,..
So he doesn't like many QBs won't...then Dak plays some.
You want people to agree with you.....and then what? What should we be so negative about?
No, "cry" instead because others see issues for what they are and refuse to cover their eyes to it, or to let anyone else convince them of something that's not true.
Really? So what is it them a good omen? The team's projected starter got taken out of a game after 3 plays and everyone should turn a blind eye to that?
It's amazing what people will tell themselves in the name of fandom.
He's saying, from what he could see on tv, the hit last night is unlikely to significantly exacerbate the existing back condition. He didn't say it was a good thing.
Whatever happened to the back last night, I'll be a lot happier to see him taking hits again. No matter how it looked on tv or what the team says, it's not good to see him take a direct hit on it on the third play of the dress rehearsal game.
So what do you do now that you refuse to cover your eyes to it?
I will be cheering hard for Romo and if he gets knocked out then I will be cheering just as hard for Dak.
You can look at Romos injury history and form your conclusions. Someone else can use the info they have and feel better about Romos chances. Why go back and forth fighting so hard to try to convince people to agree with you? You will never change anyone. They will just stop responding to the thread. It doesn't mean you convinced them.
Answers to what? What do you need to know?
The only one "crying" here is you. Because you can't handle the facts surrounding Romo and injury. That's your issue, not anybody else's.
Your reality maybe. The playing field isn't level, no matter how many times you wish it were. Romo misses more time. Deal with that fact.
I don't need anyone to agree with me. I'm just not going to sit back while people lie about the truth. Sit back and cover your own eyes, but don't try to cover other people's. Spare us the propaganda bull**** attempt.
For the back injury, sure. Not if your going to bring broken bones that have nothing to do with it into the conversation, which I'm sure is your intention.
Good look on how the hit was kind of awkward.
It's preseason, man.
In a game that counts, he would have been out for only a few plays.
I don't think anyone is delusional about Tony's age or injury history. But it would be inconsistent with good judgement to overlook his lack of injury or deterioration to his throwing arm and legs. It's also common knowledge that his experience, judgement, and leadership are exemplary.
I have the same amount of worry about his health and longevity that I do for any other aging star, like Rogers, Brady, or Rothy.
BTW, our OL has a better protection projection than most.
There is no truth. Everything is just fans opinions and perspectives. What makes your opinion any more truth than anyone else's?
I have my opinions but that doesn't mean you opinion is wrong. everyone comes here to state their own perspective and opinions. Not everyone goes back and forth with everyone that doesn't agree with them the way you do. it's kind of Weird.
Everyone has facts supporting their opinions.Because I have the facts and numbers supporting my opinion. 27 games missed. All you've got is opinion.
I respond to those who quote me, I consider it a courtesy. If you were expecting to quote me to criticize me and that be the end of it, you're mistaken. But if you want the debate to end, simply walk away and don't quote me anymore and I won't bother you again.
Everyone has facts supporting their opinions.
People have explained why the 27 games fact isn't held as high to them as it is to you. No point in even going down that road at this point.
I love a healthy respectful discussion. I respect your opinion regardless of the facts you use to support your opinion. And I respect other people's opinions also.
No need to put people into camps or make every thread a debate instead of a discussion.
I'll leave it at that.
give it a rest Stash, you can't convince some people even with facts, truth is.....if Romo goes down again these same people will be telling you....he is fragile and injury proned.Because I have the facts and numbers supporting my opinion. 27 games missed. All you've got is opinion.
OP looks foolish now.Ok dokie. Whatever pleases you.
If you believe that the procedure the doctors performed on his collarbone will make it so that it won't be able to break again then you do have to consider the collarbone as no longer an issue.
It would be like a QB missing a bunch of games due to concussions and then having him wear a true concussion proof helmet( if it existed)....that issue would no longer be an issue for him.
In any case, I will always be nervous anytime any QB we have gets hit. The human body isn't designed to take hits at the speed and impact that the NFL puts them through.