bbgun
Benched
- Messages
- 27,869
- Reaction score
- 6
AdamJT13;2561344 said:The article specifically states, "The NFL knew about that incident, but charges were never brought against anyone because the victims did not see the shooter."
Yes, the incident is old, but this is a new development, which is why I used that word.
Also, the article doesn't say ESPN "informed" the league about anything. It said the ESPN reported contacted the NFL. The NFL, though, already knew about it. I'm guessing Jerry already knew about it, too.
They knew about the old crap, not the latest twist/turn. Informed vs. contacted = apples and oranges.
Jones' release might or might not have had anything to do with that shooting, or the ESPN report about it. But ESPN obviously wants to take credit for it, regardless, and they know nobody will be able to refute that being the reason. No matter what Jerry says the real reason was, the public perception will be that it was because of the shooting and/or ESPN, whether it is true or not
"Might"? Hilarious. Maybe you think it's a coincidence that Jerry had an "epiphany" or a "crisis of conscience" on the very same day this negative story broke. Me? I'm not so gullible. Whether or not ESPN takes credit is irrelevant; all that matters is that he's gone.